Diagnostic utility of ultrasound features in identifying triple-negative breast cancer

Background: Ultrasound is commonly used to characterise clinically detected mass and mammographically suspicious lesions, determine the probability of malignancy and guide biopsy. Besides assessing the morphological features of the cancer, ultrasound may provide potentially useful information on the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jampana Sahitya, Kavya Kilaparti, Meghala Batchu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-05-01
Series:Current Medicine Research and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/cmrp.cmrp_187_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849706582821044224
author Jampana Sahitya
Kavya Kilaparti
Meghala Batchu
author_facet Jampana Sahitya
Kavya Kilaparti
Meghala Batchu
author_sort Jampana Sahitya
collection DOAJ
description Background: Ultrasound is commonly used to characterise clinically detected mass and mammographically suspicious lesions, determine the probability of malignancy and guide biopsy. Besides assessing the morphological features of the cancer, ultrasound may provide potentially useful information on the histological grade and receptor status of the cancer. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of ultrasound features of breast cancer in predicting the triple-negative receptor type of breast cancer. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out at the Alluri Sitarama Raju Academy of Medical Sciences over 15 months, involving 77 consecutive patients. Sonographic features such as tumour shape, margins, echogenicity, orientation, vascularity, posterior acoustic features and architectural distortion of the surrounding tissues were studied. Immunohistochemistry findings of all breast cancer cases were obtained, and the association between receptor status (triple negative vs. non-triple negative) and tumour grade with sonographic features was assessed. Results: In association with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) receptor status, lobulated margins had 80% sensitivity and 77.2% specificity, posterior acoustic enhancement had 70% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity, high vascularity had 85% sensitivity and 77.2% specificity, absence of architectural distortion had 85% sensitivity and 43.9% specificity and high-grade tumours had 75% sensitivity and 80.7% specificity. In association with non-TNBC receptor status, spiculated margins had 38.6% sensitivity and 95% specificity, posterior acoustic shadowing had 33.3% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity, low vascularity had 43.9% sensitivity and 65% specificity, presence of architectural distortion had 43.9% sensitivity and 85% specificity and low-grade tumours had 80.7% sensitivity and 70% specificity. Sonographic characteristics such as posterior acoustic features, margins, vascularity, grade and architectural distortion that could distinguish between TNBC and non-TNBC receptor status were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Parameters such as shape, echogenicity and orientation showed no significant difference. Conclusions: Using ultrasound characteristics, it is possible to predict receptor status, whether a particular malignant lesion is triple negative or non-triple negative and its grade.
format Article
id doaj-art-4957f08e03674e54a7aeea1c87ad5e80
institution DOAJ
issn 2352-0817
2352-0825
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Current Medicine Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-4957f08e03674e54a7aeea1c87ad5e802025-08-20T03:16:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsCurrent Medicine Research and Practice2352-08172352-08252025-05-01153889410.4103/cmrp.cmrp_187_24Diagnostic utility of ultrasound features in identifying triple-negative breast cancerJampana SahityaKavya KilapartiMeghala BatchuBackground: Ultrasound is commonly used to characterise clinically detected mass and mammographically suspicious lesions, determine the probability of malignancy and guide biopsy. Besides assessing the morphological features of the cancer, ultrasound may provide potentially useful information on the histological grade and receptor status of the cancer. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of ultrasound features of breast cancer in predicting the triple-negative receptor type of breast cancer. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out at the Alluri Sitarama Raju Academy of Medical Sciences over 15 months, involving 77 consecutive patients. Sonographic features such as tumour shape, margins, echogenicity, orientation, vascularity, posterior acoustic features and architectural distortion of the surrounding tissues were studied. Immunohistochemistry findings of all breast cancer cases were obtained, and the association between receptor status (triple negative vs. non-triple negative) and tumour grade with sonographic features was assessed. Results: In association with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) receptor status, lobulated margins had 80% sensitivity and 77.2% specificity, posterior acoustic enhancement had 70% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity, high vascularity had 85% sensitivity and 77.2% specificity, absence of architectural distortion had 85% sensitivity and 43.9% specificity and high-grade tumours had 75% sensitivity and 80.7% specificity. In association with non-TNBC receptor status, spiculated margins had 38.6% sensitivity and 95% specificity, posterior acoustic shadowing had 33.3% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity, low vascularity had 43.9% sensitivity and 65% specificity, presence of architectural distortion had 43.9% sensitivity and 85% specificity and low-grade tumours had 80.7% sensitivity and 70% specificity. Sonographic characteristics such as posterior acoustic features, margins, vascularity, grade and architectural distortion that could distinguish between TNBC and non-TNBC receptor status were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Parameters such as shape, echogenicity and orientation showed no significant difference. Conclusions: Using ultrasound characteristics, it is possible to predict receptor status, whether a particular malignant lesion is triple negative or non-triple negative and its grade.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/cmrp.cmrp_187_24human epidermal growth factor receptor 2non-triple-negative breast canceroestrogen receptorprogesterone receptortriple-negative breast cancer
spellingShingle Jampana Sahitya
Kavya Kilaparti
Meghala Batchu
Diagnostic utility of ultrasound features in identifying triple-negative breast cancer
Current Medicine Research and Practice
human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
non-triple-negative breast cancer
oestrogen receptor
progesterone receptor
triple-negative breast cancer
title Diagnostic utility of ultrasound features in identifying triple-negative breast cancer
title_full Diagnostic utility of ultrasound features in identifying triple-negative breast cancer
title_fullStr Diagnostic utility of ultrasound features in identifying triple-negative breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic utility of ultrasound features in identifying triple-negative breast cancer
title_short Diagnostic utility of ultrasound features in identifying triple-negative breast cancer
title_sort diagnostic utility of ultrasound features in identifying triple negative breast cancer
topic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
non-triple-negative breast cancer
oestrogen receptor
progesterone receptor
triple-negative breast cancer
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/cmrp.cmrp_187_24
work_keys_str_mv AT jampanasahitya diagnosticutilityofultrasoundfeaturesinidentifyingtriplenegativebreastcancer
AT kavyakilaparti diagnosticutilityofultrasoundfeaturesinidentifyingtriplenegativebreastcancer
AT meghalabatchu diagnosticutilityofultrasoundfeaturesinidentifyingtriplenegativebreastcancer