Fat Graft Myringoplasty versus Chemical Cauterization in Small Tympanic Membrane Perforation:A Comparative Study

Introduction : Tympanic membrane perforation is mostly due to infection, trauma or post tympanostomy tube insertion. A variety of autografts have been used for closure of tympanic membrane perforation such as perichondrium. temporalis fascia, cartilage fat, platelet rich plasma, and chemical cau...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vertika Tewari, Mohamed Tabrez Bahauddin Gafoor, Harendra Kumar Gautam, Azme Zehra, Priyali Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Association of Otolaryngologists of India, West Bengal 2024-11-01
Series:Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjohns.in/journal23/index.php/bjohns/article/view/62
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823858976127713280
author Vertika Tewari
Mohamed Tabrez Bahauddin Gafoor
Harendra Kumar Gautam
Azme Zehra
Priyali Singh
author_facet Vertika Tewari
Mohamed Tabrez Bahauddin Gafoor
Harendra Kumar Gautam
Azme Zehra
Priyali Singh
author_sort Vertika Tewari
collection DOAJ
description Introduction : Tympanic membrane perforation is mostly due to infection, trauma or post tympanostomy tube insertion. A variety of autografts have been used for closure of tympanic membrane perforation such as perichondrium. temporalis fascia, cartilage fat, platelet rich plasma, and chemical cauterization. Material and Method : A Prospective, Comparative and Randomized study . Eighty Patients visiting E.N.T Outpatient department at tertiary care center were selected fulfilling the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. Results : Out of 43 patients in fat graft myringoplasty, the surgery was successful in 39 (90.70%) patients. However, the success rate in chemical cauterization was found to be 88% (in 37 out of 42 patients). Overall success rate is 89.40% (in 76 out of 85). Conclusion : Fat graft myringoplasty and chemical cauterization are strongly recommended for closure of small tympanic membrane perforations; however multiple sittings are required for chemical cauterization
format Article
id doaj-art-491b3fe2cbd444b7a97ebbc5453bfbe3
institution Kabale University
issn 2395-2393
2395-2407
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher The Association of Otolaryngologists of India, West Bengal
record_format Article
series Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery
spelling doaj-art-491b3fe2cbd444b7a97ebbc5453bfbe32025-02-11T09:43:26ZengThe Association of Otolaryngologists of India, West BengalBengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery2395-23932395-24072024-11-0132110.47210/bjohns.2024.v32i1.62Fat Graft Myringoplasty versus Chemical Cauterization in Small Tympanic Membrane Perforation:A Comparative StudyVertika Tewari0Mohamed Tabrez Bahauddin Gafoor1Harendra Kumar Gautam 2Azme Zehra3Priyali Singh4University Hospital Lewisham ,LONDON UK Government Thiruvannamalai Medical College ,Thiruvannamalai,Tamil Nadu GSVM Medical College Kanpur Autonomous State Medical College , Bulandsahar,UP.India Prateek Medical Centre ,Basti ,UP Introduction : Tympanic membrane perforation is mostly due to infection, trauma or post tympanostomy tube insertion. A variety of autografts have been used for closure of tympanic membrane perforation such as perichondrium. temporalis fascia, cartilage fat, platelet rich plasma, and chemical cauterization. Material and Method : A Prospective, Comparative and Randomized study . Eighty Patients visiting E.N.T Outpatient department at tertiary care center were selected fulfilling the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. Results : Out of 43 patients in fat graft myringoplasty, the surgery was successful in 39 (90.70%) patients. However, the success rate in chemical cauterization was found to be 88% (in 37 out of 42 patients). Overall success rate is 89.40% (in 76 out of 85). Conclusion : Fat graft myringoplasty and chemical cauterization are strongly recommended for closure of small tympanic membrane perforations; however multiple sittings are required for chemical cauterization https://bjohns.in/journal23/index.php/bjohns/article/view/62FatGraftMyringoplastyChemical cauterization
spellingShingle Vertika Tewari
Mohamed Tabrez Bahauddin Gafoor
Harendra Kumar Gautam
Azme Zehra
Priyali Singh
Fat Graft Myringoplasty versus Chemical Cauterization in Small Tympanic Membrane Perforation:A Comparative Study
Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery
Fat
Graft
Myringoplasty
Chemical cauterization
title Fat Graft Myringoplasty versus Chemical Cauterization in Small Tympanic Membrane Perforation:A Comparative Study
title_full Fat Graft Myringoplasty versus Chemical Cauterization in Small Tympanic Membrane Perforation:A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Fat Graft Myringoplasty versus Chemical Cauterization in Small Tympanic Membrane Perforation:A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Fat Graft Myringoplasty versus Chemical Cauterization in Small Tympanic Membrane Perforation:A Comparative Study
title_short Fat Graft Myringoplasty versus Chemical Cauterization in Small Tympanic Membrane Perforation:A Comparative Study
title_sort fat graft myringoplasty versus chemical cauterization in small tympanic membrane perforation a comparative study
topic Fat
Graft
Myringoplasty
Chemical cauterization
url https://bjohns.in/journal23/index.php/bjohns/article/view/62
work_keys_str_mv AT vertikatewari fatgraftmyringoplastyversuschemicalcauterizationinsmalltympanicmembraneperforationacomparativestudy
AT mohamedtabrezbahauddingafoor fatgraftmyringoplastyversuschemicalcauterizationinsmalltympanicmembraneperforationacomparativestudy
AT harendrakumargautam fatgraftmyringoplastyversuschemicalcauterizationinsmalltympanicmembraneperforationacomparativestudy
AT azmezehra fatgraftmyringoplastyversuschemicalcauterizationinsmalltympanicmembraneperforationacomparativestudy
AT priyalisingh fatgraftmyringoplastyversuschemicalcauterizationinsmalltympanicmembraneperforationacomparativestudy