The socio-institutional dimension of the problem of scholasticism in the Argentine Psychology
Background: Scholasticism in the Psychology of Argentina is a problem that has not yet been overcome. In this country, different kinds of fragmentation of the discipline (e.g., between cultural and biological approaches) and hegemony of psychoanalysis are still in force. This problem has been analyz...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica – IPOPS
2019-09-01
|
| Series: | Interacciones |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.24016/2019.v5n3.168 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832574222062321664 |
|---|---|
| author | Lucas David Tosi Jeremías David Tosi |
| author_facet | Lucas David Tosi Jeremías David Tosi |
| author_sort | Lucas David Tosi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Scholasticism in the Psychology of Argentina is a problem that has not yet been overcome. In this country, different kinds of fragmentation of the discipline (e.g., between cultural and biological approaches) and hegemony of psychoanalysis are still in force. This problem has been analyzed in both individual and socio-institutional level. At individual level, two types of attitudes have been differentiated: dogmatic - represented by those who seek to preserve the scholastic condition-, and scientific -represented by those who seek to overcome this situation-. While the dogmatic attitudes are part of the problem, focusing on them could have undesirable consequences. Method: This study warns about the risks of analyzing the scholasticism in terms of "dogmatic individual". The present is a theoretical study. Conclusion: The psychologization of scholasticism and the invisibility of supra-individual factors (i.e. socio-institutional) are some of its consequences. The problem of the argentine scholasticism depends, in part, on socio-institutional factors. In practical terms, places of dialogue to analyze critically the different levels of the problem (individual and socio-institutional) should be developed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-48dce81f837146538390744b3a0bdd80 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2411-5940 2413-4465 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
| publisher | Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica – IPOPS |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Interacciones |
| spelling | doaj-art-48dce81f837146538390744b3a0bdd802025-02-02T00:21:12ZengInstituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica – IPOPSInteracciones2411-59402413-44652019-09-0153e16810.24016/2019.v5n3.168The socio-institutional dimension of the problem of scholasticism in the Argentine PsychologyLucas David Tosi 0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4458-1041Jeremías David Tosi1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7441-2495Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Mar del PlataConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasBackground: Scholasticism in the Psychology of Argentina is a problem that has not yet been overcome. In this country, different kinds of fragmentation of the discipline (e.g., between cultural and biological approaches) and hegemony of psychoanalysis are still in force. This problem has been analyzed in both individual and socio-institutional level. At individual level, two types of attitudes have been differentiated: dogmatic - represented by those who seek to preserve the scholastic condition-, and scientific -represented by those who seek to overcome this situation-. While the dogmatic attitudes are part of the problem, focusing on them could have undesirable consequences. Method: This study warns about the risks of analyzing the scholasticism in terms of "dogmatic individual". The present is a theoretical study. Conclusion: The psychologization of scholasticism and the invisibility of supra-individual factors (i.e. socio-institutional) are some of its consequences. The problem of the argentine scholasticism depends, in part, on socio-institutional factors. In practical terms, places of dialogue to analyze critically the different levels of the problem (individual and socio-institutional) should be developed.http://dx.doi.org/10.24016/2019.v5n3.168psychologypsychological schoolsattitudessocial factors |
| spellingShingle | Lucas David Tosi Jeremías David Tosi The socio-institutional dimension of the problem of scholasticism in the Argentine Psychology Interacciones psychology psychological schools attitudes social factors |
| title | The socio-institutional dimension of the problem of scholasticism in the Argentine Psychology |
| title_full | The socio-institutional dimension of the problem of scholasticism in the Argentine Psychology |
| title_fullStr | The socio-institutional dimension of the problem of scholasticism in the Argentine Psychology |
| title_full_unstemmed | The socio-institutional dimension of the problem of scholasticism in the Argentine Psychology |
| title_short | The socio-institutional dimension of the problem of scholasticism in the Argentine Psychology |
| title_sort | socio institutional dimension of the problem of scholasticism in the argentine psychology |
| topic | psychology psychological schools attitudes social factors |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.24016/2019.v5n3.168 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lucasdavidtosi thesocioinstitutionaldimensionoftheproblemofscholasticismintheargentinepsychology AT jeremiasdavidtosi thesocioinstitutionaldimensionoftheproblemofscholasticismintheargentinepsychology AT lucasdavidtosi socioinstitutionaldimensionoftheproblemofscholasticismintheargentinepsychology AT jeremiasdavidtosi socioinstitutionaldimensionoftheproblemofscholasticismintheargentinepsychology |