Deep learning for MRI-based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation—a systematic review, meta-analysis, and pilot evaluation of key results

BackgroundSegmentation of ischaemic stroke lesions from magnetic resonance images (MRI) remains a challenging task mainly due to the confounding appearance of these lesions with other pathologies, and variations in their presentation depending on the lesion stage (i.e., hyper-acute, acute, subacute...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Makram Baaklini, Maria del C. Valdés Hernández
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Medical Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmedt.2025.1491197/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850119779620225024
author Makram Baaklini
Maria del C. Valdés Hernández
author_facet Makram Baaklini
Maria del C. Valdés Hernández
author_sort Makram Baaklini
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundSegmentation of ischaemic stroke lesions from magnetic resonance images (MRI) remains a challenging task mainly due to the confounding appearance of these lesions with other pathologies, and variations in their presentation depending on the lesion stage (i.e., hyper-acute, acute, subacute and chronic). Works on the theme have been reviewed, but none of the reviews have addressed the seminal question on what would be the optimal architecture to address this challenge. We systematically reviewed the literature (2015–2023) for deep learning algorithms that segment acute and/or subacute stroke lesions on brain MRI seeking to address this question, meta-analysed the data extracted, and evaluated the results.Methods and materialsOur review, registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023481551), involved a systematic search from January 2015 to December 2023 in the following databases: IEE Explore, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, Springer, and OpenReview.net. We extracted sample characteristics, stroke stage, imaging protocols, and algorithms, and meta-analysed the data extracted. We assessed the risk of bias using NIH's study quality assessment tool, and finally, evaluated our results using data from the ISLES-2015-SISS dataset.ResultsFrom 1485 papers, 41 were ultimately retained. 13/41 studies incorporated attention mechanisms in their architecture, and 39/41 studies used the Dice Similarity Coefficient to assess algorithm performance. The generalisability of the algorithms reviewed was generally below par. In our pilot analysis, the UResNet50 configuration, which was developed based on the most comprehensive architectural components identified from the reviewed studies, demonstrated a better segmentation performance than the attention-based AG-UResNet50.ConclusionWe found no evidence that favours using attention mechanisms in deep learning architectures for acute stroke lesion segmentation on MRI data, and the use of a U-Net configuration with residual connections seems to be the most appropriate configuration for this task.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023481551, PROSPERO CRD42023481551.
format Article
id doaj-art-48d43dcd7d6043a39bc556933ef7a71f
institution OA Journals
issn 2673-3129
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medical Technology
spelling doaj-art-48d43dcd7d6043a39bc556933ef7a71f2025-08-20T02:35:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medical Technology2673-31292025-06-01710.3389/fmedt.2025.14911971491197Deep learning for MRI-based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation—a systematic review, meta-analysis, and pilot evaluation of key resultsMakram Baaklini0Maria del C. Valdés Hernández1Edinburgh Imaging Academy, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomDepartment of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomBackgroundSegmentation of ischaemic stroke lesions from magnetic resonance images (MRI) remains a challenging task mainly due to the confounding appearance of these lesions with other pathologies, and variations in their presentation depending on the lesion stage (i.e., hyper-acute, acute, subacute and chronic). Works on the theme have been reviewed, but none of the reviews have addressed the seminal question on what would be the optimal architecture to address this challenge. We systematically reviewed the literature (2015–2023) for deep learning algorithms that segment acute and/or subacute stroke lesions on brain MRI seeking to address this question, meta-analysed the data extracted, and evaluated the results.Methods and materialsOur review, registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023481551), involved a systematic search from January 2015 to December 2023 in the following databases: IEE Explore, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, Springer, and OpenReview.net. We extracted sample characteristics, stroke stage, imaging protocols, and algorithms, and meta-analysed the data extracted. We assessed the risk of bias using NIH's study quality assessment tool, and finally, evaluated our results using data from the ISLES-2015-SISS dataset.ResultsFrom 1485 papers, 41 were ultimately retained. 13/41 studies incorporated attention mechanisms in their architecture, and 39/41 studies used the Dice Similarity Coefficient to assess algorithm performance. The generalisability of the algorithms reviewed was generally below par. In our pilot analysis, the UResNet50 configuration, which was developed based on the most comprehensive architectural components identified from the reviewed studies, demonstrated a better segmentation performance than the attention-based AG-UResNet50.ConclusionWe found no evidence that favours using attention mechanisms in deep learning architectures for acute stroke lesion segmentation on MRI data, and the use of a U-Net configuration with residual connections seems to be the most appropriate configuration for this task.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023481551, PROSPERO CRD42023481551.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmedt.2025.1491197/fullacute ischaemic strokedeep learningMRIattention mechanismslesion segmentation
spellingShingle Makram Baaklini
Maria del C. Valdés Hernández
Deep learning for MRI-based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation—a systematic review, meta-analysis, and pilot evaluation of key results
Frontiers in Medical Technology
acute ischaemic stroke
deep learning
MRI
attention mechanisms
lesion segmentation
title Deep learning for MRI-based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation—a systematic review, meta-analysis, and pilot evaluation of key results
title_full Deep learning for MRI-based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation—a systematic review, meta-analysis, and pilot evaluation of key results
title_fullStr Deep learning for MRI-based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation—a systematic review, meta-analysis, and pilot evaluation of key results
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning for MRI-based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation—a systematic review, meta-analysis, and pilot evaluation of key results
title_short Deep learning for MRI-based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation—a systematic review, meta-analysis, and pilot evaluation of key results
title_sort deep learning for mri based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation a systematic review meta analysis and pilot evaluation of key results
topic acute ischaemic stroke
deep learning
MRI
attention mechanisms
lesion segmentation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmedt.2025.1491197/full
work_keys_str_mv AT makrambaaklini deeplearningformribasedacuteandsubacuteischaemicstrokelesionsegmentationasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandpilotevaluationofkeyresults
AT mariadelcvaldeshernandez deeplearningformribasedacuteandsubacuteischaemicstrokelesionsegmentationasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandpilotevaluationofkeyresults