Comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative nutritional parameters between subtotal and proximal gastrectomy in patients with proximal early gastric cancer

Abstract Aim In this study, we evaluated the difference in short‐term outcomes and postoperative nutritional status between subtotal gastrectomy (sTG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) to determine the optimal surgical treatment for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Methods Patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wataru Soneda, Masanori Terashima, Yusuke Koseki, Kenichiro Furukawa, Keiichi Fujiya, Yutaka Tanizawa, Hiroya Takeuchi, Etsuro Bando
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12856
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850034895548579840
author Wataru Soneda
Masanori Terashima
Yusuke Koseki
Kenichiro Furukawa
Keiichi Fujiya
Yutaka Tanizawa
Hiroya Takeuchi
Etsuro Bando
author_facet Wataru Soneda
Masanori Terashima
Yusuke Koseki
Kenichiro Furukawa
Keiichi Fujiya
Yutaka Tanizawa
Hiroya Takeuchi
Etsuro Bando
author_sort Wataru Soneda
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim In this study, we evaluated the difference in short‐term outcomes and postoperative nutritional status between subtotal gastrectomy (sTG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) to determine the optimal surgical treatment for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Methods Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic sTG or PG at the Shizuoka Cancer Center in Shizuoka between January 2014 and December 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, endoscopic findings, and postoperative nutritional changes, including blood tests, body weight, psoas muscle, and subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue, were measured and compared between the two groups. Results A total of 110 patients were enrolled, including 42 in the sTG group and 68 in the PG group. Albumin and hemoglobin levels were comparable between the two groups. Changes in body weight and psoas mass index measured over 36 months postoperatively were favorable in the sTG group compared with the PG group (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no significant differences in subcutaneous or visceral adipose tissue between the two groups (p = 0.331 and 0.845, respectively). Conclusion sTG is the preferred function‐preserving gastrectomy procedure for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach because it is associated with less postoperative body weight loss and psoas mass index loss.
format Article
id doaj-art-48ae3d82ad074df7850557cd73af0460
institution DOAJ
issn 2475-0328
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
spelling doaj-art-48ae3d82ad074df7850557cd73af04602025-08-20T02:57:40ZengWileyAnnals of Gastroenterological Surgery2475-03282025-01-0191899710.1002/ags3.12856Comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative nutritional parameters between subtotal and proximal gastrectomy in patients with proximal early gastric cancerWataru Soneda0Masanori Terashima1Yusuke Koseki2Kenichiro Furukawa3Keiichi Fujiya4Yutaka Tanizawa5Hiroya Takeuchi6Etsuro Bando7Division of Gastric Surgery Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka JapanDivision of Gastric Surgery Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka JapanDivision of Gastric Surgery Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka JapanDivision of Gastric Surgery Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka JapanDivision of Gastric Surgery Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka JapanDivision of Gastric Surgery Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka JapanDepartment of Surgery Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Shizuoka JapanDivision of Gastric Surgery Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka JapanAbstract Aim In this study, we evaluated the difference in short‐term outcomes and postoperative nutritional status between subtotal gastrectomy (sTG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) to determine the optimal surgical treatment for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Methods Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic sTG or PG at the Shizuoka Cancer Center in Shizuoka between January 2014 and December 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, endoscopic findings, and postoperative nutritional changes, including blood tests, body weight, psoas muscle, and subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue, were measured and compared between the two groups. Results A total of 110 patients were enrolled, including 42 in the sTG group and 68 in the PG group. Albumin and hemoglobin levels were comparable between the two groups. Changes in body weight and psoas mass index measured over 36 months postoperatively were favorable in the sTG group compared with the PG group (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no significant differences in subcutaneous or visceral adipose tissue between the two groups (p = 0.331 and 0.845, respectively). Conclusion sTG is the preferred function‐preserving gastrectomy procedure for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach because it is associated with less postoperative body weight loss and psoas mass index loss.https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12856gastric cancerlaparoscopic surgeryproximal gastrectomyrobotic surgerysubtotal gastrectomy
spellingShingle Wataru Soneda
Masanori Terashima
Yusuke Koseki
Kenichiro Furukawa
Keiichi Fujiya
Yutaka Tanizawa
Hiroya Takeuchi
Etsuro Bando
Comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative nutritional parameters between subtotal and proximal gastrectomy in patients with proximal early gastric cancer
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
gastric cancer
laparoscopic surgery
proximal gastrectomy
robotic surgery
subtotal gastrectomy
title Comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative nutritional parameters between subtotal and proximal gastrectomy in patients with proximal early gastric cancer
title_full Comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative nutritional parameters between subtotal and proximal gastrectomy in patients with proximal early gastric cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative nutritional parameters between subtotal and proximal gastrectomy in patients with proximal early gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative nutritional parameters between subtotal and proximal gastrectomy in patients with proximal early gastric cancer
title_short Comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative nutritional parameters between subtotal and proximal gastrectomy in patients with proximal early gastric cancer
title_sort comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative nutritional parameters between subtotal and proximal gastrectomy in patients with proximal early gastric cancer
topic gastric cancer
laparoscopic surgery
proximal gastrectomy
robotic surgery
subtotal gastrectomy
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12856
work_keys_str_mv AT watarusoneda comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesandpostoperativenutritionalparametersbetweensubtotalandproximalgastrectomyinpatientswithproximalearlygastriccancer
AT masanoriterashima comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesandpostoperativenutritionalparametersbetweensubtotalandproximalgastrectomyinpatientswithproximalearlygastriccancer
AT yusukekoseki comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesandpostoperativenutritionalparametersbetweensubtotalandproximalgastrectomyinpatientswithproximalearlygastriccancer
AT kenichirofurukawa comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesandpostoperativenutritionalparametersbetweensubtotalandproximalgastrectomyinpatientswithproximalearlygastriccancer
AT keiichifujiya comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesandpostoperativenutritionalparametersbetweensubtotalandproximalgastrectomyinpatientswithproximalearlygastriccancer
AT yutakatanizawa comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesandpostoperativenutritionalparametersbetweensubtotalandproximalgastrectomyinpatientswithproximalearlygastriccancer
AT hiroyatakeuchi comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesandpostoperativenutritionalparametersbetweensubtotalandproximalgastrectomyinpatientswithproximalearlygastriccancer
AT etsurobando comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesandpostoperativenutritionalparametersbetweensubtotalandproximalgastrectomyinpatientswithproximalearlygastriccancer