Responses of the African and American Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) to 2014 Arctic SSW Events

Abstract Aside from the influence of forcing from above on the ionosphere during space weather, forcing from below also have significant influence on the ionosphere. This study investigates responses of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) in the African and American longitudinal sectors to the c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: O. R. Idolor, A. O. Akala, O. S. Bolaji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-11-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002812
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536479246942208
author O. R. Idolor
A. O. Akala
O. S. Bolaji
author_facet O. R. Idolor
A. O. Akala
O. S. Bolaji
author_sort O. R. Idolor
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aside from the influence of forcing from above on the ionosphere during space weather, forcing from below also have significant influence on the ionosphere. This study investigates responses of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) in the African and American longitudinal sectors to the combined effects of 2014 Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) events and geomagnetic storms that coexisted with them. The study locations cover ±40° geomagnetic latitudes in both sectors. A multiinstrument approach with models was adopted. During the SSW events, a hemispherical asymmetry in TEC distribution was observed, with higher plasma ionization in the Northern Hemisphere (NH). Generally, in both sectors, EIA crests locations shifted to higher latitudes during peak phases of SSW, except in the SH of the African sector, where crests locations shifted to lower latitudes. Reversal of stratospheric zonal mean wind direction supported reversed fountain effect. TEC responded positively to SSW peak phases and daytime or nighttime orientation of Prompt Penetration Electric Field (PPEF) and PPEF strength played major role on TEC responses to storms. PPEF values were generally weak, but comparatively higher in the American sector. TEC were predominant in the American sector than the African sector due to the comparative higher electrodynamics over the American sector. EIA crests were generally located at higher latitudes on the days of SSW peaks than on the days of geomagnetic storms, except in the NH of the American sector. In both sectors, geomagnetic storms modified ionospheric irregularities by weakening or enhancing them, while the major SSW event weakened irregularities.
format Article
id doaj-art-48a23dace3e34d4faee4cc14b38027ce
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-48a23dace3e34d4faee4cc14b38027ce2025-01-14T16:27:04ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902021-11-011911n/an/a10.1029/2021SW002812Responses of the African and American Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) to 2014 Arctic SSW EventsO. R. Idolor0A. O. Akala1O. S. Bolaji2Department of Physics University of Lagos Lagos NigeriaDepartment of Physics University of Lagos Lagos NigeriaDepartment of Physics University of Lagos Lagos NigeriaAbstract Aside from the influence of forcing from above on the ionosphere during space weather, forcing from below also have significant influence on the ionosphere. This study investigates responses of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) in the African and American longitudinal sectors to the combined effects of 2014 Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) events and geomagnetic storms that coexisted with them. The study locations cover ±40° geomagnetic latitudes in both sectors. A multiinstrument approach with models was adopted. During the SSW events, a hemispherical asymmetry in TEC distribution was observed, with higher plasma ionization in the Northern Hemisphere (NH). Generally, in both sectors, EIA crests locations shifted to higher latitudes during peak phases of SSW, except in the SH of the African sector, where crests locations shifted to lower latitudes. Reversal of stratospheric zonal mean wind direction supported reversed fountain effect. TEC responded positively to SSW peak phases and daytime or nighttime orientation of Prompt Penetration Electric Field (PPEF) and PPEF strength played major role on TEC responses to storms. PPEF values were generally weak, but comparatively higher in the American sector. TEC were predominant in the American sector than the African sector due to the comparative higher electrodynamics over the American sector. EIA crests were generally located at higher latitudes on the days of SSW peaks than on the days of geomagnetic storms, except in the NH of the American sector. In both sectors, geomagnetic storms modified ionospheric irregularities by weakening or enhancing them, while the major SSW event weakened irregularities.https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002812ionospheric irregularitiesequatorial ionization anomalysudden stratospheric warmingvertical driftreverse fountain effect
spellingShingle O. R. Idolor
A. O. Akala
O. S. Bolaji
Responses of the African and American Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) to 2014 Arctic SSW Events
Space Weather
ionospheric irregularities
equatorial ionization anomaly
sudden stratospheric warming
vertical drift
reverse fountain effect
title Responses of the African and American Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) to 2014 Arctic SSW Events
title_full Responses of the African and American Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) to 2014 Arctic SSW Events
title_fullStr Responses of the African and American Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) to 2014 Arctic SSW Events
title_full_unstemmed Responses of the African and American Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) to 2014 Arctic SSW Events
title_short Responses of the African and American Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) to 2014 Arctic SSW Events
title_sort responses of the african and american equatorial ionization anomaly eia to 2014 arctic ssw events
topic ionospheric irregularities
equatorial ionization anomaly
sudden stratospheric warming
vertical drift
reverse fountain effect
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002812
work_keys_str_mv AT oridolor responsesoftheafricanandamericanequatorialionizationanomalyeiato2014arcticsswevents
AT aoakala responsesoftheafricanandamericanequatorialionizationanomalyeiato2014arcticsswevents
AT osbolaji responsesoftheafricanandamericanequatorialionizationanomalyeiato2014arcticsswevents