More than Just Figures: Structural and Visual Complexity in Soil Science Articles

The structure of a scientific article is crucial for clearly conveying research findings. Modern scientific publications combine text with various elements—such as tables, graphs, images, diagrams, and maps—that support the narrative and aid data interpretation. Understanding how these components in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agnieszka Wnuk, Dariusz Gozdowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-08-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/15/8724
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849407511521656832
author Agnieszka Wnuk
Dariusz Gozdowski
author_facet Agnieszka Wnuk
Dariusz Gozdowski
author_sort Agnieszka Wnuk
collection DOAJ
description The structure of a scientific article is crucial for clearly conveying research findings. Modern scientific publications combine text with various elements—such as tables, graphs, images, diagrams, and maps—that support the narrative and aid data interpretation. Understanding how these components influence a publication’s reception and scientific impact is essential. This study analyzes differences among 15 soil science journals (indexed in the Web of Science) in terms of visual elements, tables, number of authors, and article length. The journals had a 5-year Impact Factor (2023) ranging from 0.9 (<i>Soil and Environment</i>) to 10.4 (<i>Soil Biology and Biochemistry</i>). The Kruskal–Wallis test and Bonferroni-adjusted Dunn’s post hoc tests revealed statistically significant differences across all variables (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The relationships were further assessed using Pearson’s correlation, based on the median number of authors and article length, as well as the percentage of articles that include at least one element of a given type (e.g., table, graph, image, diagram, or map). Key findings show that journals with a higher impact factor tend to publish articles with more authors (r = 0.62, <i>p</i> = 0.014), use diagrams more frequently (r = 0.69, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and include fewer tables (r = –0.85, <i>p</i> < 0.001). These results suggest that journals with a higher 5-year IF tend to include articles with a greater number of authors and a higher frequency of diagram use, while relying less on tables.
format Article
id doaj-art-47fb0b0990524f2c96994f4fa9f7555b
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-47fb0b0990524f2c96994f4fa9f7555b2025-08-20T03:36:02ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172025-08-011515872410.3390/app15158724More than Just Figures: Structural and Visual Complexity in Soil Science ArticlesAgnieszka Wnuk0Dariusz Gozdowski1Department of Biometry, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Biometry, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, PolandThe structure of a scientific article is crucial for clearly conveying research findings. Modern scientific publications combine text with various elements—such as tables, graphs, images, diagrams, and maps—that support the narrative and aid data interpretation. Understanding how these components influence a publication’s reception and scientific impact is essential. This study analyzes differences among 15 soil science journals (indexed in the Web of Science) in terms of visual elements, tables, number of authors, and article length. The journals had a 5-year Impact Factor (2023) ranging from 0.9 (<i>Soil and Environment</i>) to 10.4 (<i>Soil Biology and Biochemistry</i>). The Kruskal–Wallis test and Bonferroni-adjusted Dunn’s post hoc tests revealed statistically significant differences across all variables (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The relationships were further assessed using Pearson’s correlation, based on the median number of authors and article length, as well as the percentage of articles that include at least one element of a given type (e.g., table, graph, image, diagram, or map). Key findings show that journals with a higher impact factor tend to publish articles with more authors (r = 0.62, <i>p</i> = 0.014), use diagrams more frequently (r = 0.69, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and include fewer tables (r = –0.85, <i>p</i> < 0.001). These results suggest that journals with a higher 5-year IF tend to include articles with a greater number of authors and a higher frequency of diagram use, while relying less on tables.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/15/8724impact factorsoil sciencePearson’s correlationScatterplot Matrix
spellingShingle Agnieszka Wnuk
Dariusz Gozdowski
More than Just Figures: Structural and Visual Complexity in Soil Science Articles
Applied Sciences
impact factor
soil science
Pearson’s correlation
Scatterplot Matrix
title More than Just Figures: Structural and Visual Complexity in Soil Science Articles
title_full More than Just Figures: Structural and Visual Complexity in Soil Science Articles
title_fullStr More than Just Figures: Structural and Visual Complexity in Soil Science Articles
title_full_unstemmed More than Just Figures: Structural and Visual Complexity in Soil Science Articles
title_short More than Just Figures: Structural and Visual Complexity in Soil Science Articles
title_sort more than just figures structural and visual complexity in soil science articles
topic impact factor
soil science
Pearson’s correlation
Scatterplot Matrix
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/15/8724
work_keys_str_mv AT agnieszkawnuk morethanjustfiguresstructuralandvisualcomplexityinsoilsciencearticles
AT dariuszgozdowski morethanjustfiguresstructuralandvisualcomplexityinsoilsciencearticles