Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Ability in Wheat Genotypes Through Comprehensive Stress Indices

The objective was to assess a range of stress indices to discern wheat genotypes resilient to drought stress, so forty-nine genotypes underwent scrutiny in both drought stress in rainfed conditions and non-stress settings (with supplementary irrigation), employing a 7 × 7 lattice layout with two re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vahid Sedghiyeh, Fariborz Shekari, Amin Abbasi, Naser Sabaghnia, Mozaffar Roustaii
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bogor Agricultural University 2024-11-01
Series:Hayati Journal of Biosciences
Online Access:https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/hayati/article/view/52033
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850129066794942464
author Vahid Sedghiyeh
Fariborz Shekari
Amin Abbasi
Naser Sabaghnia
Mozaffar Roustaii
author_facet Vahid Sedghiyeh
Fariborz Shekari
Amin Abbasi
Naser Sabaghnia
Mozaffar Roustaii
author_sort Vahid Sedghiyeh
collection DOAJ
description The objective was to assess a range of stress indices to discern wheat genotypes resilient to drought stress, so forty-nine genotypes underwent scrutiny in both drought stress in rainfed conditions and non-stress settings (with supplementary irrigation), employing a 7 × 7 lattice layout with two replicates across years 2019 and 2020. The evaluation incorporated twenty stress indices anchored in yield under water stress (YS) and potential (YP) circumstances. Primary analysis indicated that eight indices (RDI, YSI, YI, K2STI, MRP, REI, RR and SSPI) did not give any new information, so they were eliminated in further analysis. Genotypes G33 (4234 kg ha-1) and G9 (2227 kg ha-1) were the best genotypes based on YP in 2019 and 2020, respectively. A positive association was observed between ATI and YP and between YS with DI and K1STI in the year 2019, while in the second year, such positive associations were not seen. We found some wheat genotypes G6, G9, G10 and G11 demonstrated high performance in both potential and rainfed conditions across two years, showing yield higher than 1,800 and 2,700 kg ha-1 for YS and YP, respectively, across both years. These genotypes were detected as the most tolerant genotypes by mean-based indices (TOL, HM, GMP, and MP) as well as SSI and ATI indices, so it can be concluded that these indices are more useful than other indices for identifying the most tolerant as well as the high yielding genotypes.
format Article
id doaj-art-47a8e6b88053446d832df13a4cf5dbd5
institution OA Journals
issn 1978-3019
2086-4094
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Bogor Agricultural University
record_format Article
series Hayati Journal of Biosciences
spelling doaj-art-47a8e6b88053446d832df13a4cf5dbd52025-08-20T02:33:06ZengBogor Agricultural UniversityHayati Journal of Biosciences1978-30192086-40942024-11-0132110.4308/hjb.32.1.117-131Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Ability in Wheat Genotypes Through Comprehensive Stress IndicesVahid Sedghiyeh0Fariborz Shekari1Amin Abbasi 2Naser Sabaghnia3Mozaffar Roustaii4Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, IranDepartment of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, IranDepartment of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, IranDepartment of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, IranDryland Agriculture Research Institude, Agricultural Extension, Education and Research Organization (AREEO), Maragheh, Iran The objective was to assess a range of stress indices to discern wheat genotypes resilient to drought stress, so forty-nine genotypes underwent scrutiny in both drought stress in rainfed conditions and non-stress settings (with supplementary irrigation), employing a 7 × 7 lattice layout with two replicates across years 2019 and 2020. The evaluation incorporated twenty stress indices anchored in yield under water stress (YS) and potential (YP) circumstances. Primary analysis indicated that eight indices (RDI, YSI, YI, K2STI, MRP, REI, RR and SSPI) did not give any new information, so they were eliminated in further analysis. Genotypes G33 (4234 kg ha-1) and G9 (2227 kg ha-1) were the best genotypes based on YP in 2019 and 2020, respectively. A positive association was observed between ATI and YP and between YS with DI and K1STI in the year 2019, while in the second year, such positive associations were not seen. We found some wheat genotypes G6, G9, G10 and G11 demonstrated high performance in both potential and rainfed conditions across two years, showing yield higher than 1,800 and 2,700 kg ha-1 for YS and YP, respectively, across both years. These genotypes were detected as the most tolerant genotypes by mean-based indices (TOL, HM, GMP, and MP) as well as SSI and ATI indices, so it can be concluded that these indices are more useful than other indices for identifying the most tolerant as well as the high yielding genotypes. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/hayati/article/view/52033
spellingShingle Vahid Sedghiyeh
Fariborz Shekari
Amin Abbasi
Naser Sabaghnia
Mozaffar Roustaii
Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Ability in Wheat Genotypes Through Comprehensive Stress Indices
Hayati Journal of Biosciences
title Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Ability in Wheat Genotypes Through Comprehensive Stress Indices
title_full Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Ability in Wheat Genotypes Through Comprehensive Stress Indices
title_fullStr Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Ability in Wheat Genotypes Through Comprehensive Stress Indices
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Ability in Wheat Genotypes Through Comprehensive Stress Indices
title_short Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Ability in Wheat Genotypes Through Comprehensive Stress Indices
title_sort evaluation of drought tolerance ability in wheat genotypes through comprehensive stress indices
url https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/hayati/article/view/52033
work_keys_str_mv AT vahidsedghiyeh evaluationofdroughttoleranceabilityinwheatgenotypesthroughcomprehensivestressindices
AT fariborzshekari evaluationofdroughttoleranceabilityinwheatgenotypesthroughcomprehensivestressindices
AT aminabbasi evaluationofdroughttoleranceabilityinwheatgenotypesthroughcomprehensivestressindices
AT nasersabaghnia evaluationofdroughttoleranceabilityinwheatgenotypesthroughcomprehensivestressindices
AT mozaffarroustaii evaluationofdroughttoleranceabilityinwheatgenotypesthroughcomprehensivestressindices