Usability of the “Systematic Review Support” computer system: a methodological study
Objective: to evaluate the usability of the “Systematic Review Support” computer system. Method: methodological study involving 21 students who evaluated the computer system in a remote and synchronous usability test. Two activities were carried out, containing 21 tasks simulating the initial step...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade de São Paulo
2024-10-01
|
| Series: | Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692024000100371&lng=en&tlng=en |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850177489102438400 |
|---|---|
| author | Fernanda Martins Dias Escaldelai Leandro Escaldelai Denise Pimentel Bergamaschi |
| author_facet | Fernanda Martins Dias Escaldelai Leandro Escaldelai Denise Pimentel Bergamaschi |
| author_sort | Fernanda Martins Dias Escaldelai |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: to evaluate the usability of the “Systematic Review Support” computer system. Method: methodological study involving 21 students who evaluated the computer system in a remote and synchronous usability test. Two activities were carried out, containing 21 tasks simulating the initial steps of a review study, proposals for eliminating duplicate references, selecting studies and resolving disagreements between evaluators. At the end, participants answered the System Usability Scale questionnaire. The measures used were: completion rate with assistance (effectiveness) and time to complete the task (efficiency). The data was described in a table using the mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values. Results: in a total of 21 tasks, the participants had an assisted completion rate of 9% and an average time of 55.1 minutes (the expected time being 60 minutes). The average score provided by the System Usability Scale instrument was 82.4 (considering a score from 0 to 100), median 85; minimum value 35 and maximum 97.5. Conclusion: the computer system has the effectiveness and efficiency parameters required of a computer review tool. It has a usability score of 82.4 on a scale of 0 to 100 assessed by the System Usability Scale instrument. The version presented incorporates the adjustments identified in the test in use. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4799bdbfc99f4c9eb07b8e6fcd8a6728 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1518-8345 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-10-01 |
| publisher | Universidade de São Paulo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem |
| spelling | doaj-art-4799bdbfc99f4c9eb07b8e6fcd8a67282025-08-20T02:18:58ZengUniversidade de São PauloRevista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem1518-83452024-10-013210.1590/1518-8345.7081.4374Usability of the “Systematic Review Support” computer system: a methodological studyFernanda Martins Dias Escaldelaihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3457-8428Leandro Escaldelaihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8864-5265Denise Pimentel Bergamaschihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6889-8588 Objective: to evaluate the usability of the “Systematic Review Support” computer system. Method: methodological study involving 21 students who evaluated the computer system in a remote and synchronous usability test. Two activities were carried out, containing 21 tasks simulating the initial steps of a review study, proposals for eliminating duplicate references, selecting studies and resolving disagreements between evaluators. At the end, participants answered the System Usability Scale questionnaire. The measures used were: completion rate with assistance (effectiveness) and time to complete the task (efficiency). The data was described in a table using the mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values. Results: in a total of 21 tasks, the participants had an assisted completion rate of 9% and an average time of 55.1 minutes (the expected time being 60 minutes). The average score provided by the System Usability Scale instrument was 82.4 (considering a score from 0 to 100), median 85; minimum value 35 and maximum 97.5. Conclusion: the computer system has the effectiveness and efficiency parameters required of a computer review tool. It has a usability score of 82.4 on a scale of 0 to 100 assessed by the System Usability Scale instrument. The version presented incorporates the adjustments identified in the test in use.http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692024000100371&lng=en&tlng=enCloud ComputingUser-Centered DesignReviewSystematic ReviewSoftwareInformation Technology |
| spellingShingle | Fernanda Martins Dias Escaldelai Leandro Escaldelai Denise Pimentel Bergamaschi Usability of the “Systematic Review Support” computer system: a methodological study Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem Cloud Computing User-Centered Design Review Systematic Review Software Information Technology |
| title | Usability of the “Systematic Review Support” computer system: a methodological study |
| title_full | Usability of the “Systematic Review Support” computer system: a methodological study |
| title_fullStr | Usability of the “Systematic Review Support” computer system: a methodological study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Usability of the “Systematic Review Support” computer system: a methodological study |
| title_short | Usability of the “Systematic Review Support” computer system: a methodological study |
| title_sort | usability of the systematic review support computer system a methodological study |
| topic | Cloud Computing User-Centered Design Review Systematic Review Software Information Technology |
| url | http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692024000100371&lng=en&tlng=en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandamartinsdiasescaldelai usabilityofthesystematicreviewsupportcomputersystemamethodologicalstudy AT leandroescaldelai usabilityofthesystematicreviewsupportcomputersystemamethodologicalstudy AT denisepimentelbergamaschi usabilityofthesystematicreviewsupportcomputersystemamethodologicalstudy |