Biomechanical comparison of various bone reduction forceps in interfragmentary compression and area of compression in an experimental model of canine lateral humeral condylar fractures.

<h4>Objective</h4>To compare contact area and interfragmentary compression generated by Vulsellum forceps, Patellar forceps, Kyon FineTouch forceps, point-to-point forceps with soft-locking mechanism, and point-to-point forceps with speed-locking mechanism in simulated lateral humeral co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madison Baskette, Cassio Ricardo Auada Ferrigno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317793
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849311622563102720
author Madison Baskette
Cassio Ricardo Auada Ferrigno
author_facet Madison Baskette
Cassio Ricardo Auada Ferrigno
author_sort Madison Baskette
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>To compare contact area and interfragmentary compression generated by Vulsellum forceps, Patellar forceps, Kyon FineTouch forceps, point-to-point forceps with soft-locking mechanism, and point-to-point forceps with speed-locking mechanism in simulated lateral humeral condylar fractures in canine cadavers.<h4>Study design</h4>Ex-vivo biomechanical study.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Seven cadaveric canine humeri with simulated lateral humeral condylar fractures were used in this study. A stress-sensitive film was placed at the fracture gap and five different bone reduction forceps were used to reduce the fractures to their maximum pressure before failure occurred. The compression and interfragmentary compression area were recorded during the entire compression interval and compared after the pressure had reached a plateau.<h4>Results</h4>Patellar forceps generated the highest interfragmentary compression, followed by Vulsellum forceps. Compression generated by both the Patellar and Vulsellum forceps were significantly higher than point-to-point forceps with soft-lock, point-to-point forceps with speed lock, and Kyon forceps (P = 0.0008, 0.0084). No statistically significant difference was observed in the areas of compression among all forceps types.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Patellar and Vulsellum forceps generate a greater interfragmentary compression compared to Kyon FineTouch forceps and point-to-point forceps with both speed and soft-locking mechanisms in this experimental lateral condylar fracture model.
format Article
id doaj-art-4789c67b93fa43389c6690fa4ffa52bf
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-4789c67b93fa43389c6690fa4ffa52bf2025-08-20T03:53:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01202e031779310.1371/journal.pone.0317793Biomechanical comparison of various bone reduction forceps in interfragmentary compression and area of compression in an experimental model of canine lateral humeral condylar fractures.Madison BasketteCassio Ricardo Auada Ferrigno<h4>Objective</h4>To compare contact area and interfragmentary compression generated by Vulsellum forceps, Patellar forceps, Kyon FineTouch forceps, point-to-point forceps with soft-locking mechanism, and point-to-point forceps with speed-locking mechanism in simulated lateral humeral condylar fractures in canine cadavers.<h4>Study design</h4>Ex-vivo biomechanical study.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Seven cadaveric canine humeri with simulated lateral humeral condylar fractures were used in this study. A stress-sensitive film was placed at the fracture gap and five different bone reduction forceps were used to reduce the fractures to their maximum pressure before failure occurred. The compression and interfragmentary compression area were recorded during the entire compression interval and compared after the pressure had reached a plateau.<h4>Results</h4>Patellar forceps generated the highest interfragmentary compression, followed by Vulsellum forceps. Compression generated by both the Patellar and Vulsellum forceps were significantly higher than point-to-point forceps with soft-lock, point-to-point forceps with speed lock, and Kyon forceps (P = 0.0008, 0.0084). No statistically significant difference was observed in the areas of compression among all forceps types.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Patellar and Vulsellum forceps generate a greater interfragmentary compression compared to Kyon FineTouch forceps and point-to-point forceps with both speed and soft-locking mechanisms in this experimental lateral condylar fracture model.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317793
spellingShingle Madison Baskette
Cassio Ricardo Auada Ferrigno
Biomechanical comparison of various bone reduction forceps in interfragmentary compression and area of compression in an experimental model of canine lateral humeral condylar fractures.
PLoS ONE
title Biomechanical comparison of various bone reduction forceps in interfragmentary compression and area of compression in an experimental model of canine lateral humeral condylar fractures.
title_full Biomechanical comparison of various bone reduction forceps in interfragmentary compression and area of compression in an experimental model of canine lateral humeral condylar fractures.
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison of various bone reduction forceps in interfragmentary compression and area of compression in an experimental model of canine lateral humeral condylar fractures.
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison of various bone reduction forceps in interfragmentary compression and area of compression in an experimental model of canine lateral humeral condylar fractures.
title_short Biomechanical comparison of various bone reduction forceps in interfragmentary compression and area of compression in an experimental model of canine lateral humeral condylar fractures.
title_sort biomechanical comparison of various bone reduction forceps in interfragmentary compression and area of compression in an experimental model of canine lateral humeral condylar fractures
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317793
work_keys_str_mv AT madisonbaskette biomechanicalcomparisonofvariousbonereductionforcepsininterfragmentarycompressionandareaofcompressioninanexperimentalmodelofcaninelateralhumeralcondylarfractures
AT cassioricardoauadaferrigno biomechanicalcomparisonofvariousbonereductionforcepsininterfragmentarycompressionandareaofcompressioninanexperimentalmodelofcaninelateralhumeralcondylarfractures