Book Review of the Women in the Legislation Arena in Iran (1285-1395)

This article reviews the book “Women in the Legislation Arena in Iran (1285-1395)” written by Manchoohr Nazari. This book is one of the rare studies on the topic of women suffrage, so it is of great importance. The main formal critique of this book has to do with plagiarism mainly because the author...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alireza MollayeeTavani, Sareh Asgari
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) 2020-11-01
Series:پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5815_af53ce2c1a4b703ecd3a979e6bcc107e.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841555231776702464
author Alireza MollayeeTavani
Sareh Asgari
author_facet Alireza MollayeeTavani
Sareh Asgari
author_sort Alireza MollayeeTavani
collection DOAJ
description This article reviews the book “Women in the Legislation Arena in Iran (1285-1395)” written by Manchoohr Nazari. This book is one of the rare studies on the topic of women suffrage, so it is of great importance. The main formal critique of this book has to do with plagiarism mainly because the author has not followed the rules in citations, and many of the references are either missing or faulty. Despite the reachability of the first-handed documents, in many cases, the secondary documents have been cited, and in some cases, the secondary references have been intentionally dismissed, and the author has cited them as the first-handed document directly. The main content-based shortcomings are as follow: inconsistency of title with content, the loss of the first- handed references such as documents, extended negotiations, periodicals, memories, formal reports, and simultaneous historiography, ignoring other events and variables leading to the suffrage of women in the span of 57 years, missing to analyze some events and delivering very hurried, a superficial and skimming overview of the many of influential events and opinions, as well as proposing some contradicted demonstrations. Considering all the formal and content-based aspects of this book, it could be concluded that the book, despite its pompous title, has failed to sketch out an accurate account of events leading to the suffrage of women.
format Article
id doaj-art-476da711735341249bf60ace7a48a4a6
institution Kabale University
issn 2383-1650
language fas
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
record_format Article
series پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
spelling doaj-art-476da711735341249bf60ace7a48a4a62025-01-08T05:47:06ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی2383-16502020-11-0120924927210.30465/crtls.2020.31388.18775815Book Review of the Women in the Legislation Arena in Iran (1285-1395)Alireza MollayeeTavani0Sareh Asgari1Associate Professor in History, Institute for Humanities and Cultural StudiesMA in History, Institute for Humanities and Cultural StudiesThis article reviews the book “Women in the Legislation Arena in Iran (1285-1395)” written by Manchoohr Nazari. This book is one of the rare studies on the topic of women suffrage, so it is of great importance. The main formal critique of this book has to do with plagiarism mainly because the author has not followed the rules in citations, and many of the references are either missing or faulty. Despite the reachability of the first-handed documents, in many cases, the secondary documents have been cited, and in some cases, the secondary references have been intentionally dismissed, and the author has cited them as the first-handed document directly. The main content-based shortcomings are as follow: inconsistency of title with content, the loss of the first- handed references such as documents, extended negotiations, periodicals, memories, formal reports, and simultaneous historiography, ignoring other events and variables leading to the suffrage of women in the span of 57 years, missing to analyze some events and delivering very hurried, a superficial and skimming overview of the many of influential events and opinions, as well as proposing some contradicted demonstrations. Considering all the formal and content-based aspects of this book, it could be concluded that the book, despite its pompous title, has failed to sketch out an accurate account of events leading to the suffrage of women.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5815_af53ce2c1a4b703ecd3a979e6bcc107e.pdfconstitutional movementnational consultative assembly and senatewomen suffragepolitical participationwomen movementwhite revolutionislamic consultative assembly
spellingShingle Alireza MollayeeTavani
Sareh Asgari
Book Review of the Women in the Legislation Arena in Iran (1285-1395)
پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
constitutional movement
national consultative assembly and senate
women suffrage
political participation
women movement
white revolution
islamic consultative assembly
title Book Review of the Women in the Legislation Arena in Iran (1285-1395)
title_full Book Review of the Women in the Legislation Arena in Iran (1285-1395)
title_fullStr Book Review of the Women in the Legislation Arena in Iran (1285-1395)
title_full_unstemmed Book Review of the Women in the Legislation Arena in Iran (1285-1395)
title_short Book Review of the Women in the Legislation Arena in Iran (1285-1395)
title_sort book review of the women in the legislation arena in iran 1285 1395
topic constitutional movement
national consultative assembly and senate
women suffrage
political participation
women movement
white revolution
islamic consultative assembly
url https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5815_af53ce2c1a4b703ecd3a979e6bcc107e.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alirezamollayeetavani bookreviewofthewomeninthelegislationarenainiran12851395
AT sarehasgari bookreviewofthewomeninthelegislationarenainiran12851395