Reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science: introducing a critical systems approach

Abstract Non-technical summary Transdisciplinary sustainability scientists work with many different actors in pursuit of change. In so doing they make choices about why and how to engage with different perspectives in their research. Reflexivity – active individual and collective critical reflection...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anita Lazurko, Michele-Lee Moore, L. Jamila Haider, Simon West, Daniel D. P. McCarthy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Global Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059479824000498/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841526415005057024
author Anita Lazurko
Michele-Lee Moore
L. Jamila Haider
Simon West
Daniel D. P. McCarthy
author_facet Anita Lazurko
Michele-Lee Moore
L. Jamila Haider
Simon West
Daniel D. P. McCarthy
author_sort Anita Lazurko
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Non-technical summary Transdisciplinary sustainability scientists work with many different actors in pursuit of change. In so doing they make choices about why and how to engage with different perspectives in their research. Reflexivity – active individual and collective critical reflection – is considered an important capacity for researchers to address the resulting ethical and practical challenges. We developed a framework for reflexivity as a transformative capacity in sustainability science through a critical systems approach, which helps make any decisions that influence which perspectives are included or excluded in research explicit. We suggest that transdisciplinary sustainability research can become more transformative by nurturing reflexivity. Technical summary Transdisciplinary sustainability science is increasingly applied to study transformative change. Yet, transdisciplinary research involves diverse actors who hold contrasting and sometimes conflicting perspectives and worldviews. Reflexivity is cited as a crucial capacity for navigating the resulting challenges, yet notions of reflexivity are often focused on individual researcher reflections that lack explicit links to the collective transdisciplinary research process and predominant modes of inquiry in the field. This gap presents the risk that reflexivity remains on the periphery of sustainability science and becomes ‘unreflexive’, as crucial dimensions are left unacknowledged. Our objective was to establish a framework for reflexivity as a transformative capacity in sustainability science through a critical systems approach. We developed and refined the framework through a rapid scoping review of literature on transdisciplinarity, transformation, and reflexivity, and reflection on a scenario study in the Red River Basin (US, Canada). The framework characterizes reflexivity as the capacity to nurture a dynamic, embedded, and collective process of self-scrutiny and mutual learning in service of transformative change, which manifests through interacting boundary processes – boundary delineation, interaction, and transformation. The case study reflection suggests how embedding this framework in research can expose boundary processes that block transformation and nurture more reflexive and transformative research. Social media summary Transdisciplinary sustainability research may become more transformative by nurturing reflexivity as a dynamic, embedded, and collective learning process.
format Article
id doaj-art-4737789ef470470a9d94de479ca2e98b
institution Kabale University
issn 2059-4798
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Global Sustainability
spelling doaj-art-4737789ef470470a9d94de479ca2e98b2025-01-16T21:51:51ZengCambridge University PressGlobal Sustainability2059-47982025-01-01810.1017/sus.2024.49Reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science: introducing a critical systems approachAnita Lazurko0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3313-4091Michele-Lee Moore1L. Jamila Haider2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-5356Simon West3Daniel D. P. McCarthy4Soils & Land Use Group, UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster, UK School of Environment, Resources, and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, CanadaStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden Centre for Global Studies and Dept of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, CanadaStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Northern Institute, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, AustraliaSchool of Environment, Resources, and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, CanadaAbstract Non-technical summary Transdisciplinary sustainability scientists work with many different actors in pursuit of change. In so doing they make choices about why and how to engage with different perspectives in their research. Reflexivity – active individual and collective critical reflection – is considered an important capacity for researchers to address the resulting ethical and practical challenges. We developed a framework for reflexivity as a transformative capacity in sustainability science through a critical systems approach, which helps make any decisions that influence which perspectives are included or excluded in research explicit. We suggest that transdisciplinary sustainability research can become more transformative by nurturing reflexivity. Technical summary Transdisciplinary sustainability science is increasingly applied to study transformative change. Yet, transdisciplinary research involves diverse actors who hold contrasting and sometimes conflicting perspectives and worldviews. Reflexivity is cited as a crucial capacity for navigating the resulting challenges, yet notions of reflexivity are often focused on individual researcher reflections that lack explicit links to the collective transdisciplinary research process and predominant modes of inquiry in the field. This gap presents the risk that reflexivity remains on the periphery of sustainability science and becomes ‘unreflexive’, as crucial dimensions are left unacknowledged. Our objective was to establish a framework for reflexivity as a transformative capacity in sustainability science through a critical systems approach. We developed and refined the framework through a rapid scoping review of literature on transdisciplinarity, transformation, and reflexivity, and reflection on a scenario study in the Red River Basin (US, Canada). The framework characterizes reflexivity as the capacity to nurture a dynamic, embedded, and collective process of self-scrutiny and mutual learning in service of transformative change, which manifests through interacting boundary processes – boundary delineation, interaction, and transformation. The case study reflection suggests how embedding this framework in research can expose boundary processes that block transformation and nurture more reflexive and transformative research. Social media summary Transdisciplinary sustainability research may become more transformative by nurturing reflexivity as a dynamic, embedded, and collective learning process. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059479824000498/type/journal_articlecommunication and educationmodeling and simulationplanning and designpoliciespolitics and governancesocial value
spellingShingle Anita Lazurko
Michele-Lee Moore
L. Jamila Haider
Simon West
Daniel D. P. McCarthy
Reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science: introducing a critical systems approach
Global Sustainability
communication and education
modeling and simulation
planning and design
policies
politics and governance
social value
title Reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science: introducing a critical systems approach
title_full Reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science: introducing a critical systems approach
title_fullStr Reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science: introducing a critical systems approach
title_full_unstemmed Reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science: introducing a critical systems approach
title_short Reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science: introducing a critical systems approach
title_sort reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science introducing a critical systems approach
topic communication and education
modeling and simulation
planning and design
policies
politics and governance
social value
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059479824000498/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT anitalazurko reflexivityasatransformativecapacityforsustainabilityscienceintroducingacriticalsystemsapproach
AT micheleleemoore reflexivityasatransformativecapacityforsustainabilityscienceintroducingacriticalsystemsapproach
AT ljamilahaider reflexivityasatransformativecapacityforsustainabilityscienceintroducingacriticalsystemsapproach
AT simonwest reflexivityasatransformativecapacityforsustainabilityscienceintroducingacriticalsystemsapproach
AT danieldpmccarthy reflexivityasatransformativecapacityforsustainabilityscienceintroducingacriticalsystemsapproach