Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation
Abstract Introduction Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods A s...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2021-02-01
|
| Series: | World Journal of Emergency Surgery |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00350-7 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850184077478461440 |
|---|---|
| author | Federico Coccolini Yoram Kluger Ernest E. Moore Ronald V. Maier Raul Coimbra Carlos Ordoñez Rao Ivatury Andrew W. Kirkpatrick Walter Biffl Massimo Sartelli Andreas Hecker Luca Ansaloni Ari Leppaniemi Viktor Reva Ian Civil Felipe Vega Massimo Chiarugi Alain Chichom-Mefire Boris Sakakushev Andrew Peitzman Osvaldo Chiara Fikri Abu-Zidan Marc Maegele Mario Miccoli Mircea Chirica Vladimir Khokha Michael Sugrue Gustavo P. Fraga Yasuhiro Otomo Gian Luca Baiocchi Fausto Catena the WSES Trauma Quality Indicators Expert Panel |
| author_facet | Federico Coccolini Yoram Kluger Ernest E. Moore Ronald V. Maier Raul Coimbra Carlos Ordoñez Rao Ivatury Andrew W. Kirkpatrick Walter Biffl Massimo Sartelli Andreas Hecker Luca Ansaloni Ari Leppaniemi Viktor Reva Ian Civil Felipe Vega Massimo Chiarugi Alain Chichom-Mefire Boris Sakakushev Andrew Peitzman Osvaldo Chiara Fikri Abu-Zidan Marc Maegele Mario Miccoli Mircea Chirica Vladimir Khokha Michael Sugrue Gustavo P. Fraga Yasuhiro Otomo Gian Luca Baiocchi Fausto Catena the WSES Trauma Quality Indicators Expert Panel |
| author_sort | Federico Coccolini |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Introduction Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference Results An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4727d19b4fa0433eace5e043d8f503c8 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1749-7922 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | World Journal of Emergency Surgery |
| spelling | doaj-art-4727d19b4fa0433eace5e043d8f503c82025-08-20T02:17:09ZengBMCWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery1749-79222021-02-0116111010.1186/s13017-021-00350-7Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluationFederico Coccolini0Yoram Kluger1Ernest E. Moore2Ronald V. Maier3Raul Coimbra4Carlos Ordoñez5Rao Ivatury6Andrew W. Kirkpatrick7Walter Biffl8Massimo Sartelli9Andreas Hecker10Luca Ansaloni11Ari Leppaniemi12Viktor Reva13Ian Civil14Felipe Vega15Massimo Chiarugi16Alain Chichom-Mefire17Boris Sakakushev18Andrew Peitzman19Osvaldo Chiara20Fikri Abu-Zidan21Marc Maegele22Mario Miccoli23Mircea Chirica24Vladimir Khokha25Michael Sugrue26Gustavo P. Fraga27Yasuhiro Otomo28Gian Luca Baiocchi29Fausto Catena30the WSES Trauma Quality Indicators Expert PanelGeneral Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University HospitalDivision of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care CampusErnest E Moore Shock Trauma Center, Denver HealthDepartment of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of WashingtonRiverside University Health SystemDivision of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Fundación Valle del LiliVCU Medical CenterGeneral, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical CentreDepartment of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital La JollaGeneral and Emergency Surgery, Macerata HospitalDepartment of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of GiessenGeneral, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini HospitalAbdominal Center, Helsinki University HospitalDepartment of War Surgery, Kirov Military Medical AcademyGeneral and Emergency Surgery Dept., Auckland City HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Angeles LomasGeneral Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University HospitalFaculty of Health Sciences, University of BueaGeneral Surgery Department, University Hospital St GeorgeDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of MedicineTrauma Team and General Surgery, ASST NiguardaDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE UniversityDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), University Witten/Herdecke (UW/H)Statistic Dept., Pisa UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble AlpesDepartment of Emergency Surgery, City HospitalGeneral Surgery Dept., Letterkenny HospitalDivision of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of CampinasTrauma and Acute Critical Care Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University HospitalGeneral Surgery, Brescia University HospitalEmergency and Trauma Surgery, Parma University HospitalAbstract Introduction Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference Results An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00350-7PerformanceProductMorbidityMortalitySystemAnalysis |
| spellingShingle | Federico Coccolini Yoram Kluger Ernest E. Moore Ronald V. Maier Raul Coimbra Carlos Ordoñez Rao Ivatury Andrew W. Kirkpatrick Walter Biffl Massimo Sartelli Andreas Hecker Luca Ansaloni Ari Leppaniemi Viktor Reva Ian Civil Felipe Vega Massimo Chiarugi Alain Chichom-Mefire Boris Sakakushev Andrew Peitzman Osvaldo Chiara Fikri Abu-Zidan Marc Maegele Mario Miccoli Mircea Chirica Vladimir Khokha Michael Sugrue Gustavo P. Fraga Yasuhiro Otomo Gian Luca Baiocchi Fausto Catena the WSES Trauma Quality Indicators Expert Panel Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation World Journal of Emergency Surgery Performance Product Morbidity Mortality System Analysis |
| title | Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation |
| title_full | Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation |
| title_fullStr | Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation |
| title_short | Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation |
| title_sort | trauma quality indicators internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation |
| topic | Performance Product Morbidity Mortality System Analysis |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00350-7 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT federicococcolini traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT yoramkluger traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT ernestemoore traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT ronaldvmaier traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT raulcoimbra traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT carlosordonez traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT raoivatury traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT andrewwkirkpatrick traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT walterbiffl traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT massimosartelli traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT andreashecker traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT lucaansaloni traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT arileppaniemi traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT viktorreva traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT iancivil traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT felipevega traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT massimochiarugi traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT alainchichommefire traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT borissakakushev traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT andrewpeitzman traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT osvaldochiara traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT fikriabuzidan traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT marcmaegele traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT mariomiccoli traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT mirceachirica traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT vladimirkhokha traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT michaelsugrue traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT gustavopfraga traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT yasuhirootomo traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT gianlucabaiocchi traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT faustocatena traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation AT thewsestraumaqualityindicatorsexpertpanel traumaqualityindicatorsinternationallyapprovedcorefactorsfortraumamanagementqualityevaluation |