Assessment of Potential Live Kidney Donors and Computed Tomographic Renal Angiograms at Christchurch Hospital

Aims. To examine the outcome of potential live kidney donors (PLKD) assessment program at Christchurch Hospital and, also, to review findings of Computed Tomographic (CT) renal angiograms that led to exclusion in the surgical assessment. Methods. Clinical data was obtained from the database of kidne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thamer Alsulaiman, Stephen Mark, Sarah Armstrong, David McGregor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Advances in Urology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4924320
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850104438272819200
author Thamer Alsulaiman
Stephen Mark
Sarah Armstrong
David McGregor
author_facet Thamer Alsulaiman
Stephen Mark
Sarah Armstrong
David McGregor
author_sort Thamer Alsulaiman
collection DOAJ
description Aims. To examine the outcome of potential live kidney donors (PLKD) assessment program at Christchurch Hospital and, also, to review findings of Computed Tomographic (CT) renal angiograms that led to exclusion in the surgical assessment. Methods. Clinical data was obtained from the database of kidney transplants, Proton. Radiological investigations were reviewed using the hospital database, Éclair. The transplant coordinator was interviewed to clarify information about PLKD who did not proceed to surgery, and a consultant radiologist was interviewed to explain unfavorable findings on CT renal angiograms. Results. 162 PLKD were identified during the period January 04–June 08. Of those, 65 (40%) proceeded to have nephrectomy, 15 were accepted and planned to proceed to surgery, 13 were awaiting further assessment, and 69 (42.5%) did not proceed to nephrectomy. Of the 162 PLKD, 142 (88%) were directed donors. The proportion of altruistic PLKD who opted out was significantly higher than that of directed PLKD (45% versus 7%, P=0.00004). Conclusions. This audit demonstrated a positive experience of live kidney donation at Christchurch Hospital. CT renal angiogram can potentially detect incidental or controversial pathologies in the kidney and the surrounding structures. Altruistic donation remains controversial with higher rates of opting out.
format Article
id doaj-art-471e8685ef2f419cbaab7d63207434d7
institution DOAJ
issn 1687-6369
1687-6377
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Urology
spelling doaj-art-471e8685ef2f419cbaab7d63207434d72025-08-20T02:39:19ZengWileyAdvances in Urology1687-63691687-63772016-01-01201610.1155/2016/49243204924320Assessment of Potential Live Kidney Donors and Computed Tomographic Renal Angiograms at Christchurch HospitalThamer Alsulaiman0Stephen Mark1Sarah Armstrong2David McGregor3Christchurch Hospital, Private Bag 4710, Christchurch 8140, New ZealandChristchurch Hospital, Private Bag 4710, Christchurch 8140, New ZealandChristchurch Hospital, Private Bag 4710, Christchurch 8140, New ZealandChristchurch Hospital, Private Bag 4710, Christchurch 8140, New ZealandAims. To examine the outcome of potential live kidney donors (PLKD) assessment program at Christchurch Hospital and, also, to review findings of Computed Tomographic (CT) renal angiograms that led to exclusion in the surgical assessment. Methods. Clinical data was obtained from the database of kidney transplants, Proton. Radiological investigations were reviewed using the hospital database, Éclair. The transplant coordinator was interviewed to clarify information about PLKD who did not proceed to surgery, and a consultant radiologist was interviewed to explain unfavorable findings on CT renal angiograms. Results. 162 PLKD were identified during the period January 04–June 08. Of those, 65 (40%) proceeded to have nephrectomy, 15 were accepted and planned to proceed to surgery, 13 were awaiting further assessment, and 69 (42.5%) did not proceed to nephrectomy. Of the 162 PLKD, 142 (88%) were directed donors. The proportion of altruistic PLKD who opted out was significantly higher than that of directed PLKD (45% versus 7%, P=0.00004). Conclusions. This audit demonstrated a positive experience of live kidney donation at Christchurch Hospital. CT renal angiogram can potentially detect incidental or controversial pathologies in the kidney and the surrounding structures. Altruistic donation remains controversial with higher rates of opting out.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4924320
spellingShingle Thamer Alsulaiman
Stephen Mark
Sarah Armstrong
David McGregor
Assessment of Potential Live Kidney Donors and Computed Tomographic Renal Angiograms at Christchurch Hospital
Advances in Urology
title Assessment of Potential Live Kidney Donors and Computed Tomographic Renal Angiograms at Christchurch Hospital
title_full Assessment of Potential Live Kidney Donors and Computed Tomographic Renal Angiograms at Christchurch Hospital
title_fullStr Assessment of Potential Live Kidney Donors and Computed Tomographic Renal Angiograms at Christchurch Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Potential Live Kidney Donors and Computed Tomographic Renal Angiograms at Christchurch Hospital
title_short Assessment of Potential Live Kidney Donors and Computed Tomographic Renal Angiograms at Christchurch Hospital
title_sort assessment of potential live kidney donors and computed tomographic renal angiograms at christchurch hospital
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4924320
work_keys_str_mv AT thameralsulaiman assessmentofpotentiallivekidneydonorsandcomputedtomographicrenalangiogramsatchristchurchhospital
AT stephenmark assessmentofpotentiallivekidneydonorsandcomputedtomographicrenalangiogramsatchristchurchhospital
AT saraharmstrong assessmentofpotentiallivekidneydonorsandcomputedtomographicrenalangiogramsatchristchurchhospital
AT davidmcgregor assessmentofpotentiallivekidneydonorsandcomputedtomographicrenalangiogramsatchristchurchhospital