One Shoe to Fit Them All? Effect of Various Carbon Plate Running Shoes on Running Economy in Male and Female Amateur Triathletes and Runners at Individual Training and Race Paces

Carbon plate running shoes (CPRSs) have gained widespread popularity among elite and amateur runners, representing one of the most substantial changes in running gear over the past decade. Compared to elite runners, however, amateurs run at lower speeds and show more diverse running styles. This is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marlene Riedl, Carlo von Diecken, Olaf Ueberschär
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/24/11535
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846106124950962176
author Marlene Riedl
Carlo von Diecken
Olaf Ueberschär
author_facet Marlene Riedl
Carlo von Diecken
Olaf Ueberschär
author_sort Marlene Riedl
collection DOAJ
description Carbon plate running shoes (CPRSs) have gained widespread popularity among elite and amateur runners, representing one of the most substantial changes in running gear over the past decade. Compared to elite runners, however, amateurs run at lower speeds and show more diverse running styles. This is a meaningful difference as many previous studies on CPRSs focus either on highly trained male runners and higher speeds or only on a single CPRSs manufacturer. The present study aims at bridging this gap by investigating how CPRSs from four different manufacturers affect running economy in amateurs of both sexes at their individual running speeds. For this purpose, 21 trained amateur triathletes (12 men; 9 women) completed an incremental treadmill test until volitional exhaustion, yielding running speeds at ventilatory thresholds 1 (<i>v</i><sub>VT1</sub>) and 2 (<i>v</i><sub>VT2</sub>). In a second session, subjects ran five trials of 3 × 3 min (speeds of 90% <i>v</i><sub>VT1</sub>, ½ (<i>v</i><sub>VT1</sub> + <i>v</i><sub>VT2</sub>), and 100% <i>v</i><sub>VT2</sub>), wearing one out of four different pairs of CPRSs or their own preferred non-CPRS shoes in each trial. Our results show that tested CPRS models resulted in a significant reduction in the mean energy cost of transport, compared to the non-CPRS control condition, with Cohen’s d amounting to −1.52 (<i>p</i> = 0.016), 2.31 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), 2.57 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and 2.80 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively, although effect sizes varied substantially between subjects and running speeds. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that amateur athletes may benefit from various manufacturers’ CPRS models at their typical running speeds to a similar degree as highly trained runners. It is recommended that amateur athletes evaluate a range of CPRSs and select the shoe that elicits the least subjective sensation of fatigue over a testing distance of at least 400–1000 m.
format Article
id doaj-art-46f52bdaa6574d419e30fe47488fd9c6
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-46f52bdaa6574d419e30fe47488fd9c62024-12-27T14:07:35ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172024-12-0114241153510.3390/app142411535One Shoe to Fit Them All? Effect of Various Carbon Plate Running Shoes on Running Economy in Male and Female Amateur Triathletes and Runners at Individual Training and Race PacesMarlene Riedl0Carlo von Diecken1Olaf Ueberschär2Department of Engineering and Industrial Design, Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences, 39114 Magdeburg, GermanyInstitute for Advanced Biomechanics and Motion Studies, Offenburg University, 77652 Offenburg, GermanyDepartment of Engineering and Industrial Design, Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences, 39114 Magdeburg, GermanyCarbon plate running shoes (CPRSs) have gained widespread popularity among elite and amateur runners, representing one of the most substantial changes in running gear over the past decade. Compared to elite runners, however, amateurs run at lower speeds and show more diverse running styles. This is a meaningful difference as many previous studies on CPRSs focus either on highly trained male runners and higher speeds or only on a single CPRSs manufacturer. The present study aims at bridging this gap by investigating how CPRSs from four different manufacturers affect running economy in amateurs of both sexes at their individual running speeds. For this purpose, 21 trained amateur triathletes (12 men; 9 women) completed an incremental treadmill test until volitional exhaustion, yielding running speeds at ventilatory thresholds 1 (<i>v</i><sub>VT1</sub>) and 2 (<i>v</i><sub>VT2</sub>). In a second session, subjects ran five trials of 3 × 3 min (speeds of 90% <i>v</i><sub>VT1</sub>, ½ (<i>v</i><sub>VT1</sub> + <i>v</i><sub>VT2</sub>), and 100% <i>v</i><sub>VT2</sub>), wearing one out of four different pairs of CPRSs or their own preferred non-CPRS shoes in each trial. Our results show that tested CPRS models resulted in a significant reduction in the mean energy cost of transport, compared to the non-CPRS control condition, with Cohen’s d amounting to −1.52 (<i>p</i> = 0.016), 2.31 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), 2.57 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and 2.80 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively, although effect sizes varied substantially between subjects and running speeds. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that amateur athletes may benefit from various manufacturers’ CPRS models at their typical running speeds to a similar degree as highly trained runners. It is recommended that amateur athletes evaluate a range of CPRSs and select the shoe that elicits the least subjective sensation of fatigue over a testing distance of at least 400–1000 m.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/24/11535energy cost of runningcarbon-fiber racing shoesadvanced footwear technologyspirometrybiomechanics
spellingShingle Marlene Riedl
Carlo von Diecken
Olaf Ueberschär
One Shoe to Fit Them All? Effect of Various Carbon Plate Running Shoes on Running Economy in Male and Female Amateur Triathletes and Runners at Individual Training and Race Paces
Applied Sciences
energy cost of running
carbon-fiber racing shoes
advanced footwear technology
spirometry
biomechanics
title One Shoe to Fit Them All? Effect of Various Carbon Plate Running Shoes on Running Economy in Male and Female Amateur Triathletes and Runners at Individual Training and Race Paces
title_full One Shoe to Fit Them All? Effect of Various Carbon Plate Running Shoes on Running Economy in Male and Female Amateur Triathletes and Runners at Individual Training and Race Paces
title_fullStr One Shoe to Fit Them All? Effect of Various Carbon Plate Running Shoes on Running Economy in Male and Female Amateur Triathletes and Runners at Individual Training and Race Paces
title_full_unstemmed One Shoe to Fit Them All? Effect of Various Carbon Plate Running Shoes on Running Economy in Male and Female Amateur Triathletes and Runners at Individual Training and Race Paces
title_short One Shoe to Fit Them All? Effect of Various Carbon Plate Running Shoes on Running Economy in Male and Female Amateur Triathletes and Runners at Individual Training and Race Paces
title_sort one shoe to fit them all effect of various carbon plate running shoes on running economy in male and female amateur triathletes and runners at individual training and race paces
topic energy cost of running
carbon-fiber racing shoes
advanced footwear technology
spirometry
biomechanics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/24/11535
work_keys_str_mv AT marleneriedl oneshoetofitthemalleffectofvariouscarbonplaterunningshoesonrunningeconomyinmaleandfemaleamateurtriathletesandrunnersatindividualtrainingandracepaces
AT carlovondiecken oneshoetofitthemalleffectofvariouscarbonplaterunningshoesonrunningeconomyinmaleandfemaleamateurtriathletesandrunnersatindividualtrainingandracepaces
AT olafueberschar oneshoetofitthemalleffectofvariouscarbonplaterunningshoesonrunningeconomyinmaleandfemaleamateurtriathletesandrunnersatindividualtrainingandracepaces