Association of Pharmacogenotyping and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain Management

Background: Chronic pain is a complex condition affecting patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing offers an approach to personalize pain management by optimizing medication regimens. However, the impact of this approach on measurable patient reported outcomes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Bollinger, Kurt E. Hersberger, Julia Gianora, Isabelle O. Urdieux, Henriette E. Meyer zu Schwabedissen, Nikki Rommers, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Céline K. Stäuble, Samuel S. Allemann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-07-01
Series:Health Services Insights
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251356560
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849703760041869312
author Anna Bollinger
Kurt E. Hersberger
Julia Gianora
Isabelle O. Urdieux
Henriette E. Meyer zu Schwabedissen
Nikki Rommers
Matthias Schwenkglenks
Céline K. Stäuble
Samuel S. Allemann
author_facet Anna Bollinger
Kurt E. Hersberger
Julia Gianora
Isabelle O. Urdieux
Henriette E. Meyer zu Schwabedissen
Nikki Rommers
Matthias Schwenkglenks
Céline K. Stäuble
Samuel S. Allemann
author_sort Anna Bollinger
collection DOAJ
description Background: Chronic pain is a complex condition affecting patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing offers an approach to personalize pain management by optimizing medication regimens. However, the impact of this approach on measurable patient reported outcomes (PROs) remains unexplored. Objectives: This study evaluated the association of PGx testing on PROs in chronic pain patients and investigated differences between those who received PGx-guided therapy and those who did not, focusing on changes in HRQoL and pain intensity from pre-to-post PGx. Design: An exploratory pre-post analysis was conducted as part of an observational case series assessing the influence of PGx testing and subsequent PGx-guided therapy on PROs in chronic pain patients with drug-related problems under their analgesic regimen. Methods: PROs were assessed in 29 patients pre-PGx (baseline) and post-PGx (follow-up, 4-6 weeks later). HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-5L. The EQ index was calculated using the German value set. Pain intensity was determined with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Minimal important difference (MID) threshold was applied for both outcomes. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, chi-square tests, and effect size calculations. Results: The mean EQ index score improved from pre-to-post PGx (0.379 ± 0.420-0.697 ± 0.307, P  < .001, d  = −0.84). Stratification revealed that the PGx-guided therapy group showed significantly greater improvements in HRQoL and NRS compared to the non-PGx guided therapy group ( P  < .01). Among 19 patients who met the MID for the EQ index, 18 had undergone PGx-guided therapy. For NRS, MID was reached in 3 pain intensity categories in the PGx-guided therapy group. Conclusions: HRQoL and pain intensity significantly improved after PGx testing, with potentially clinically relevant results in the PGx-guided therapy group. Due to the observational nature of the study, further controlled studies are required to assess the clinical impact and economic feasibility of PGx-guided therapy.
format Article
id doaj-art-46d01735acac4700aee1ce69d3d349cd
institution DOAJ
issn 1178-6329
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Health Services Insights
spelling doaj-art-46d01735acac4700aee1ce69d3d349cd2025-08-20T03:17:08ZengSAGE PublishingHealth Services Insights1178-63292025-07-011810.1177/11786329251356560Association of Pharmacogenotyping and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain ManagementAnna Bollinger0Kurt E. Hersberger1Julia Gianora2Isabelle O. Urdieux3Henriette E. Meyer zu Schwabedissen4Nikki Rommers5Matthias Schwenkglenks6Céline K. Stäuble7Samuel S. Allemann8Biopharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandPharmaceutical Care Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandBiopharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandBiopharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandBiopharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandHealth Economics Facility, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandInstitute of Hospital Pharmacy, Stadtspital Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandPharmaceutical Care Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandBackground: Chronic pain is a complex condition affecting patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing offers an approach to personalize pain management by optimizing medication regimens. However, the impact of this approach on measurable patient reported outcomes (PROs) remains unexplored. Objectives: This study evaluated the association of PGx testing on PROs in chronic pain patients and investigated differences between those who received PGx-guided therapy and those who did not, focusing on changes in HRQoL and pain intensity from pre-to-post PGx. Design: An exploratory pre-post analysis was conducted as part of an observational case series assessing the influence of PGx testing and subsequent PGx-guided therapy on PROs in chronic pain patients with drug-related problems under their analgesic regimen. Methods: PROs were assessed in 29 patients pre-PGx (baseline) and post-PGx (follow-up, 4-6 weeks later). HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-5L. The EQ index was calculated using the German value set. Pain intensity was determined with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Minimal important difference (MID) threshold was applied for both outcomes. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, chi-square tests, and effect size calculations. Results: The mean EQ index score improved from pre-to-post PGx (0.379 ± 0.420-0.697 ± 0.307, P  < .001, d  = −0.84). Stratification revealed that the PGx-guided therapy group showed significantly greater improvements in HRQoL and NRS compared to the non-PGx guided therapy group ( P  < .01). Among 19 patients who met the MID for the EQ index, 18 had undergone PGx-guided therapy. For NRS, MID was reached in 3 pain intensity categories in the PGx-guided therapy group. Conclusions: HRQoL and pain intensity significantly improved after PGx testing, with potentially clinically relevant results in the PGx-guided therapy group. Due to the observational nature of the study, further controlled studies are required to assess the clinical impact and economic feasibility of PGx-guided therapy.https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251356560
spellingShingle Anna Bollinger
Kurt E. Hersberger
Julia Gianora
Isabelle O. Urdieux
Henriette E. Meyer zu Schwabedissen
Nikki Rommers
Matthias Schwenkglenks
Céline K. Stäuble
Samuel S. Allemann
Association of Pharmacogenotyping and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain Management
Health Services Insights
title Association of Pharmacogenotyping and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain Management
title_full Association of Pharmacogenotyping and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain Management
title_fullStr Association of Pharmacogenotyping and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain Management
title_full_unstemmed Association of Pharmacogenotyping and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain Management
title_short Association of Pharmacogenotyping and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain Management
title_sort association of pharmacogenotyping and patient reported outcomes in chronic pain management
url https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251356560
work_keys_str_mv AT annabollinger associationofpharmacogenotypingandpatientreportedoutcomesinchronicpainmanagement
AT kurtehersberger associationofpharmacogenotypingandpatientreportedoutcomesinchronicpainmanagement
AT juliagianora associationofpharmacogenotypingandpatientreportedoutcomesinchronicpainmanagement
AT isabelleourdieux associationofpharmacogenotypingandpatientreportedoutcomesinchronicpainmanagement
AT henrietteemeyerzuschwabedissen associationofpharmacogenotypingandpatientreportedoutcomesinchronicpainmanagement
AT nikkirommers associationofpharmacogenotypingandpatientreportedoutcomesinchronicpainmanagement
AT matthiasschwenkglenks associationofpharmacogenotypingandpatientreportedoutcomesinchronicpainmanagement
AT celinekstauble associationofpharmacogenotypingandpatientreportedoutcomesinchronicpainmanagement
AT samuelsallemann associationofpharmacogenotypingandpatientreportedoutcomesinchronicpainmanagement