Introduction to algorithmic ethics under a neutrosophic framework: Re-mapping the debate
Algorithms have become an integral part of professional life and social interactions, in health, transport, commerce and industry. Moreover, they are bringing about changes in the natural, social and human sciences, enriching our knowledge and testing the limits of technology. In the age of artifici...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of New Mexico
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Neutrosophic Sets and Systems |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://fs.unm.edu/NSS/AlgorithmicEthics15.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849233897087303680 |
|---|---|
| author | Florentin Smarandache Antonios Paraskevas |
| author_facet | Florentin Smarandache Antonios Paraskevas |
| author_sort | Florentin Smarandache |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Algorithms have become an integral part of professional life and social interactions, in health, transport, commerce and industry. Moreover, they are bringing about changes in the natural, social and human sciences, enriching our knowledge and testing the limits of technology. In the age of artificial intelligence (AI), the ethical behavior of algorithms is facing increasing scrutiny. Traditional models that attempt to evaluate algorithm ethics using binary or probabilistic methods often fall short in addressing the complexity and uncertainties present in real-world situations. This study introduces a novel approach to assessing algorithmic ethics by utilizing neutrosophic indeterminacy. Neutrosophic logic, which considers three parameters - truth (T), falsity (F), and indeterminacy (I) - provides a robust framework for capturing the ambiguity and inconsistencies that arise in ethical decision-making processes. By utilizing this approach, we attempt to develop a method for measuring ethical ambiguity in algorithmic decision-making. By applying the proposed conceptual framework to an illustrative example we highlight the capacity of neutrosophic logic to capture and measure ethical uncertainties in a more comprehensive manner, thus offering a new tool for evaluating the ethical integrity of algorithms in complex environments. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-469f7a87e95749db81e70cf1e2ca6dfe |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2331-6055 2331-608X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | University of New Mexico |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Neutrosophic Sets and Systems |
| spelling | doaj-art-469f7a87e95749db81e70cf1e2ca6dfe2025-08-20T04:03:21ZengUniversity of New MexicoNeutrosophic Sets and Systems2331-60552331-608X2025-01-017530230810.5281/zenodo.13947771Introduction to algorithmic ethics under a neutrosophic framework: Re-mapping the debateFlorentin SmarandacheAntonios ParaskevasAlgorithms have become an integral part of professional life and social interactions, in health, transport, commerce and industry. Moreover, they are bringing about changes in the natural, social and human sciences, enriching our knowledge and testing the limits of technology. In the age of artificial intelligence (AI), the ethical behavior of algorithms is facing increasing scrutiny. Traditional models that attempt to evaluate algorithm ethics using binary or probabilistic methods often fall short in addressing the complexity and uncertainties present in real-world situations. This study introduces a novel approach to assessing algorithmic ethics by utilizing neutrosophic indeterminacy. Neutrosophic logic, which considers three parameters - truth (T), falsity (F), and indeterminacy (I) - provides a robust framework for capturing the ambiguity and inconsistencies that arise in ethical decision-making processes. By utilizing this approach, we attempt to develop a method for measuring ethical ambiguity in algorithmic decision-making. By applying the proposed conceptual framework to an illustrative example we highlight the capacity of neutrosophic logic to capture and measure ethical uncertainties in a more comprehensive manner, thus offering a new tool for evaluating the ethical integrity of algorithms in complex environments.https://fs.unm.edu/NSS/AlgorithmicEthics15.pdfneutrosophic ethical integrity scoreneutrosophic logicalgorithmic ethicsfairnesstransparencyaccountability |
| spellingShingle | Florentin Smarandache Antonios Paraskevas Introduction to algorithmic ethics under a neutrosophic framework: Re-mapping the debate Neutrosophic Sets and Systems neutrosophic ethical integrity score neutrosophic logic algorithmic ethics fairness transparency accountability |
| title | Introduction to algorithmic ethics under a neutrosophic framework: Re-mapping the debate |
| title_full | Introduction to algorithmic ethics under a neutrosophic framework: Re-mapping the debate |
| title_fullStr | Introduction to algorithmic ethics under a neutrosophic framework: Re-mapping the debate |
| title_full_unstemmed | Introduction to algorithmic ethics under a neutrosophic framework: Re-mapping the debate |
| title_short | Introduction to algorithmic ethics under a neutrosophic framework: Re-mapping the debate |
| title_sort | introduction to algorithmic ethics under a neutrosophic framework re mapping the debate |
| topic | neutrosophic ethical integrity score neutrosophic logic algorithmic ethics fairness transparency accountability |
| url | https://fs.unm.edu/NSS/AlgorithmicEthics15.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT florentinsmarandache introductiontoalgorithmicethicsunderaneutrosophicframeworkremappingthedebate AT antoniosparaskevas introductiontoalgorithmicethicsunderaneutrosophicframeworkremappingthedebate |