Comparison of Hospital Stay After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With or Without Enhanced Recovery Protocol

Objective: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a protocol of evidence based practices applied in major surgery. Open aortic aneurysm repair is major surgery in terms of complications and mortality. This study aimed to compare early outcomes of ERAS with a traditional post-operative protocol in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ilaria Peluttiero, Dimitrios Apostolou, Gianfranco Varetto, Lorenzo Gibello, Erica Mariani, Edoardo Frola, Fabio Barili, Matteo Ripepi, Massimo Maione, Fabio Verzini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-01-01
Series:EJVES Vascular Forum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24001497
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850257590029647872
author Ilaria Peluttiero
Dimitrios Apostolou
Gianfranco Varetto
Lorenzo Gibello
Erica Mariani
Edoardo Frola
Fabio Barili
Matteo Ripepi
Massimo Maione
Fabio Verzini
author_facet Ilaria Peluttiero
Dimitrios Apostolou
Gianfranco Varetto
Lorenzo Gibello
Erica Mariani
Edoardo Frola
Fabio Barili
Matteo Ripepi
Massimo Maione
Fabio Verzini
author_sort Ilaria Peluttiero
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a protocol of evidence based practices applied in major surgery. Open aortic aneurysm repair is major surgery in terms of complications and mortality. This study aimed to compare early outcomes of ERAS with a traditional post-operative protocol in patients undergoing elective open aortic surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2018 – 2022 in two tertiary vascular surgery centres. The ERAS program was routinely implemented in one centre, while the other one used a standard peri-operative protocol. The primary outcome was post-operative length of stay (pLOS). Secondary outcomes were 30 day mortality rate, complications, re-interventions, and re-hospitalisations. Propensity score weighting was used to balance the two groups by comorbidities. Inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) was used to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated patients. Results: A total of 198 patients were enrolled: 128 in the ERAS group (EG) and 70 in the standard group (SG). Mean age was 70.8 ± 6.7 years in EG and 71.1 ± 6.7 in SG (p = 0.39). No significant differences were observed in pre-operative cardiovascular risk factors. The median pLOS was 5 days (IQR 3, 6) in the EG group and 8 days (IQR 6, 11) in the SG group (p < 0.001). No differences in terms of mortality, re-operations, and re-hospitalisations were observed. The IPTW analyses showed a 40% reduction in pLOS and a significant reduction in major complications in EG (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.66; p < 0.001). A 45% increase in pLOS in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was found in both groups. Conclusion: Enhanced recovery after surgery is safe and feasible for elective open aortic surgery and is associated with earlier hospital discharge without differences in terms of mortality and lower complication rates compared with a standard protocol. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major risk factor for an increase in pLOS. The ERAS protocol is promising in terms of resource utilisation.
format Article
id doaj-art-4690a431383e4e458aadb7b85f739ec4
institution OA Journals
issn 2666-688X
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series EJVES Vascular Forum
spelling doaj-art-4690a431383e4e458aadb7b85f739ec42025-08-20T01:56:24ZengElsevierEJVES Vascular Forum2666-688X2024-01-01629710310.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.10.004Comparison of Hospital Stay After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With or Without Enhanced Recovery ProtocolIlaria Peluttiero0Dimitrios Apostolou1Gianfranco Varetto2Lorenzo Gibello3Erica Mariani4Edoardo Frola5Fabio Barili6Matteo Ripepi7Massimo Maione8Fabio Verzini9Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy; Corresponding author. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, ItalyVascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Turin University, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e Della Scienza, Molinette Hospital, Turin, ItalyVascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Turin University, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e Della Scienza, Molinette Hospital, Turin, ItalyVascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, ItalyVascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant’Ambrogio, Milan, ItalyVascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Turin University, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e Della Scienza, Molinette Hospital, Turin, ItalyVascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, ItalyVascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Turin University, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e Della Scienza, Molinette Hospital, Turin, ItalyObjective: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a protocol of evidence based practices applied in major surgery. Open aortic aneurysm repair is major surgery in terms of complications and mortality. This study aimed to compare early outcomes of ERAS with a traditional post-operative protocol in patients undergoing elective open aortic surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2018 – 2022 in two tertiary vascular surgery centres. The ERAS program was routinely implemented in one centre, while the other one used a standard peri-operative protocol. The primary outcome was post-operative length of stay (pLOS). Secondary outcomes were 30 day mortality rate, complications, re-interventions, and re-hospitalisations. Propensity score weighting was used to balance the two groups by comorbidities. Inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) was used to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated patients. Results: A total of 198 patients were enrolled: 128 in the ERAS group (EG) and 70 in the standard group (SG). Mean age was 70.8 ± 6.7 years in EG and 71.1 ± 6.7 in SG (p = 0.39). No significant differences were observed in pre-operative cardiovascular risk factors. The median pLOS was 5 days (IQR 3, 6) in the EG group and 8 days (IQR 6, 11) in the SG group (p < 0.001). No differences in terms of mortality, re-operations, and re-hospitalisations were observed. The IPTW analyses showed a 40% reduction in pLOS and a significant reduction in major complications in EG (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.66; p < 0.001). A 45% increase in pLOS in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was found in both groups. Conclusion: Enhanced recovery after surgery is safe and feasible for elective open aortic surgery and is associated with earlier hospital discharge without differences in terms of mortality and lower complication rates compared with a standard protocol. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major risk factor for an increase in pLOS. The ERAS protocol is promising in terms of resource utilisation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24001497ERASEnhanced recoveryOpen aortic surgeryPost-operative length of stay
spellingShingle Ilaria Peluttiero
Dimitrios Apostolou
Gianfranco Varetto
Lorenzo Gibello
Erica Mariani
Edoardo Frola
Fabio Barili
Matteo Ripepi
Massimo Maione
Fabio Verzini
Comparison of Hospital Stay After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With or Without Enhanced Recovery Protocol
EJVES Vascular Forum
ERAS
Enhanced recovery
Open aortic surgery
Post-operative length of stay
title Comparison of Hospital Stay After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With or Without Enhanced Recovery Protocol
title_full Comparison of Hospital Stay After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With or Without Enhanced Recovery Protocol
title_fullStr Comparison of Hospital Stay After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With or Without Enhanced Recovery Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Hospital Stay After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With or Without Enhanced Recovery Protocol
title_short Comparison of Hospital Stay After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With or Without Enhanced Recovery Protocol
title_sort comparison of hospital stay after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with or without enhanced recovery protocol
topic ERAS
Enhanced recovery
Open aortic surgery
Post-operative length of stay
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24001497
work_keys_str_mv AT ilariapeluttiero comparisonofhospitalstayafteropenabdominalaorticaneurysmrepairwithorwithoutenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT dimitriosapostolou comparisonofhospitalstayafteropenabdominalaorticaneurysmrepairwithorwithoutenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT gianfrancovaretto comparisonofhospitalstayafteropenabdominalaorticaneurysmrepairwithorwithoutenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT lorenzogibello comparisonofhospitalstayafteropenabdominalaorticaneurysmrepairwithorwithoutenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT ericamariani comparisonofhospitalstayafteropenabdominalaorticaneurysmrepairwithorwithoutenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT edoardofrola comparisonofhospitalstayafteropenabdominalaorticaneurysmrepairwithorwithoutenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT fabiobarili comparisonofhospitalstayafteropenabdominalaorticaneurysmrepairwithorwithoutenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT matteoripepi comparisonofhospitalstayafteropenabdominalaorticaneurysmrepairwithorwithoutenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT massimomaione comparisonofhospitalstayafteropenabdominalaorticaneurysmrepairwithorwithoutenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT fabioverzini comparisonofhospitalstayafteropenabdominalaorticaneurysmrepairwithorwithoutenhancedrecoveryprotocol