Personal Name as a Marker of a New Semiotic System: Inter-Slavic Parallels (from the National Revival of the 19th c. to Modern Neo-Paganism)

This article examines naming practices in three different types of situations: during the Czech and Slovak National Revival of the first half of the 19th century, in Russia and the USSR in the 1920s, and in contemporary neo-pagan communities of various Slavic countries. Despite the differences in hi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dmitry Kirillovich Polyakov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta 2024-12-01
Series:Вопросы ономастики
Subjects:
Online Access:https://onomastics.ru/en/content/2024-volume-21-issue-3-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850050700875137024
author Dmitry Kirillovich Polyakov
author_facet Dmitry Kirillovich Polyakov
author_sort Dmitry Kirillovich Polyakov
collection DOAJ
description This article examines naming practices in three different types of situations: during the Czech and Slovak National Revival of the first half of the 19th century, in Russia and the USSR in the 1920s, and in contemporary neo-pagan communities of various Slavic countries. Despite the differences in historical and cultural context, these situations are typologically comparable. Each of them involves the construction of a new sign system, in which new anthroponyms play a key role, along with other linguistic and extra-linguistic phenomena. In all three situations there was an anthroponymic boom, a mass creation of new personal names (neo-anthroponyms) that would be used by the bearer of the new code. The source of motivation for name-making in the National Revival and neo-paganism is the traditional, even archaic set of Slavic patterns, since “Slavicness” is seen as the highest value (cf. the Czech 1830s “patriotic names” Pravoslav, Rodomil, Dobromila, etc., or the neo-pagan names Pravdomir, Budislav, Vitoslav, etc.). Anthroponymic practices of the early Soviet Union, on the contrary, focused primarily on other patterns, such as abbreviation (Kim, Marklen, Vilena, etc.), whaile some new personal names were also created following the traditional “Slavic” patterns (Krasnoslav, Novomir). The use of this word-formational pattern in different cultural situations indicates its continuity and great pragmatic potential.
format Article
id doaj-art-46850b91c1914e91abdad26a9b8c5aad
institution DOAJ
issn 1994-2400
1994-2451
language Russian
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta
record_format Article
series Вопросы ономастики
spelling doaj-art-46850b91c1914e91abdad26a9b8c5aad2025-08-20T02:53:22ZrusIzdatelstvo Uralskogo UniversitetaВопросы ономастики1994-24001994-24512024-12-0121313915510.15826/vopr_onom.2024.21.3.035Personal Name as a Marker of a New Semiotic System: Inter-Slavic Parallels (from the National Revival of the 19th c. to Modern Neo-Paganism)Dmitry Kirillovich Polyakov0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-2841Institute for Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, RussiaThis article examines naming practices in three different types of situations: during the Czech and Slovak National Revival of the first half of the 19th century, in Russia and the USSR in the 1920s, and in contemporary neo-pagan communities of various Slavic countries. Despite the differences in historical and cultural context, these situations are typologically comparable. Each of them involves the construction of a new sign system, in which new anthroponyms play a key role, along with other linguistic and extra-linguistic phenomena. In all three situations there was an anthroponymic boom, a mass creation of new personal names (neo-anthroponyms) that would be used by the bearer of the new code. The source of motivation for name-making in the National Revival and neo-paganism is the traditional, even archaic set of Slavic patterns, since “Slavicness” is seen as the highest value (cf. the Czech 1830s “patriotic names” Pravoslav, Rodomil, Dobromila, etc., or the neo-pagan names Pravdomir, Budislav, Vitoslav, etc.). Anthroponymic practices of the early Soviet Union, on the contrary, focused primarily on other patterns, such as abbreviation (Kim, Marklen, Vilena, etc.), whaile some new personal names were also created following the traditional “Slavic” patterns (Krasnoslav, Novomir). The use of this word-formational pattern in different cultural situations indicates its continuity and great pragmatic potential.https://onomastics.ru/en/content/2024-volume-21-issue-3-6anthroponymyname changenamingnational revivalneo-pagan namespatriotic namesrevolutionary namesromantic nationalismslavic names
spellingShingle Dmitry Kirillovich Polyakov
Personal Name as a Marker of a New Semiotic System: Inter-Slavic Parallels (from the National Revival of the 19th c. to Modern Neo-Paganism)
Вопросы ономастики
anthroponymy
name change
naming
national revival
neo-pagan names
patriotic names
revolutionary names
romantic nationalism
slavic names
title Personal Name as a Marker of a New Semiotic System: Inter-Slavic Parallels (from the National Revival of the 19th c. to Modern Neo-Paganism)
title_full Personal Name as a Marker of a New Semiotic System: Inter-Slavic Parallels (from the National Revival of the 19th c. to Modern Neo-Paganism)
title_fullStr Personal Name as a Marker of a New Semiotic System: Inter-Slavic Parallels (from the National Revival of the 19th c. to Modern Neo-Paganism)
title_full_unstemmed Personal Name as a Marker of a New Semiotic System: Inter-Slavic Parallels (from the National Revival of the 19th c. to Modern Neo-Paganism)
title_short Personal Name as a Marker of a New Semiotic System: Inter-Slavic Parallels (from the National Revival of the 19th c. to Modern Neo-Paganism)
title_sort personal name as a marker of a new semiotic system inter slavic parallels from the national revival of the 19th c to modern neo paganism
topic anthroponymy
name change
naming
national revival
neo-pagan names
patriotic names
revolutionary names
romantic nationalism
slavic names
url https://onomastics.ru/en/content/2024-volume-21-issue-3-6
work_keys_str_mv AT dmitrykirillovichpolyakov personalnameasamarkerofanewsemioticsysteminterslavicparallelsfromthenationalrevivalofthe19thctomodernneopaganism