A Review of “Access to Care” Issues in Aortic Stenosis Patients: A Negative Report Card

The identification and management of patients with aortic stenosis exist along a continuum that includes healthy living, latent progression, diagnosis, treatment, and posttreatment recovery. Barriers to the provision of appropriate care for these patients can occur at any stage along this continuum....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam M. Reisman, MD, Sammy Elmariah, MD, MPH
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Structural Heart
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870624001064
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861173602222080
author Adam M. Reisman, MD
Sammy Elmariah, MD, MPH
author_facet Adam M. Reisman, MD
Sammy Elmariah, MD, MPH
author_sort Adam M. Reisman, MD
collection DOAJ
description The identification and management of patients with aortic stenosis exist along a continuum that includes healthy living, latent progression, diagnosis, treatment, and posttreatment recovery. Barriers to the provision of appropriate care for these patients can occur at any stage along this continuum. Despite the presence of diagnostic echocardiograms, many patients with aortic stenosis are never clinically recognized, and the rate of mismanagement worsens among underrepresented minority groups and women. Regarding the treatment of clinically recognized aortic stenosis, only about half of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis actually undergo aortic valve replacement within 2 ​years of diagnosis. Treatment rates are even lower among patients with symptomatic low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Although several strategies have been raised by experts within the field to help and improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients with aortic valve disease, timely referral to a heart valve team specialist whenever aortic valve replacement is being considered likely remains the most pertinent intervention. Connecting these patients with fully informed aortic valve disease experts helps facilitate shared decision-making discussions, thus ensuring that patients have the opportunity to learn about and potentially receive the lifesaving interventions available to them.
format Article
id doaj-art-4635e6fa0c4c48f696d669422772e327
institution Kabale University
issn 2474-8706
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Structural Heart
spelling doaj-art-4635e6fa0c4c48f696d669422772e3272025-02-10T04:34:40ZengElsevierStructural Heart2474-87062025-01-0191100351A Review of “Access to Care” Issues in Aortic Stenosis Patients: A Negative Report CardAdam M. Reisman, MD0Sammy Elmariah, MD, MPH1Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Address correspondence to: Adam M. Reisman, MD, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029.Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CaliforniaThe identification and management of patients with aortic stenosis exist along a continuum that includes healthy living, latent progression, diagnosis, treatment, and posttreatment recovery. Barriers to the provision of appropriate care for these patients can occur at any stage along this continuum. Despite the presence of diagnostic echocardiograms, many patients with aortic stenosis are never clinically recognized, and the rate of mismanagement worsens among underrepresented minority groups and women. Regarding the treatment of clinically recognized aortic stenosis, only about half of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis actually undergo aortic valve replacement within 2 ​years of diagnosis. Treatment rates are even lower among patients with symptomatic low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Although several strategies have been raised by experts within the field to help and improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients with aortic valve disease, timely referral to a heart valve team specialist whenever aortic valve replacement is being considered likely remains the most pertinent intervention. Connecting these patients with fully informed aortic valve disease experts helps facilitate shared decision-making discussions, thus ensuring that patients have the opportunity to learn about and potentially receive the lifesaving interventions available to them.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870624001064Access to careAortic stenosisAortic valve diseaseAortic valve replacementHealth disparitiesTAVR
spellingShingle Adam M. Reisman, MD
Sammy Elmariah, MD, MPH
A Review of “Access to Care” Issues in Aortic Stenosis Patients: A Negative Report Card
Structural Heart
Access to care
Aortic stenosis
Aortic valve disease
Aortic valve replacement
Health disparities
TAVR
title A Review of “Access to Care” Issues in Aortic Stenosis Patients: A Negative Report Card
title_full A Review of “Access to Care” Issues in Aortic Stenosis Patients: A Negative Report Card
title_fullStr A Review of “Access to Care” Issues in Aortic Stenosis Patients: A Negative Report Card
title_full_unstemmed A Review of “Access to Care” Issues in Aortic Stenosis Patients: A Negative Report Card
title_short A Review of “Access to Care” Issues in Aortic Stenosis Patients: A Negative Report Card
title_sort review of access to care issues in aortic stenosis patients a negative report card
topic Access to care
Aortic stenosis
Aortic valve disease
Aortic valve replacement
Health disparities
TAVR
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870624001064
work_keys_str_mv AT adammreismanmd areviewofaccesstocareissuesinaorticstenosispatientsanegativereportcard
AT sammyelmariahmdmph areviewofaccesstocareissuesinaorticstenosispatientsanegativereportcard
AT adammreismanmd reviewofaccesstocareissuesinaorticstenosispatientsanegativereportcard
AT sammyelmariahmdmph reviewofaccesstocareissuesinaorticstenosispatientsanegativereportcard