The methods of prophylaxis of the pancreatic fistula occurrence after pancreato–duodenectomy
Objective. To elaborate the measures system, which permit to reduce the occurrence of pancreatic fistula and other severe complications after performance of pancreato–duodenectomy. Materials and methods. There were analyzed the results of treatment of 327 patients, in whom pancreato–duodenectomy...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Liga-Inform ltd.
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | Клінічна хірургія |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hirurgiya.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1014 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850051194515357696 |
|---|---|
| author | V. M. Kopchak L. O. Pererva R. V. Saliutin V. O. Kropelnytskyi I. V. Khomiak O. V. Duvalko V. P. Schkarban Yu. O. Khilko V. I. Trachuk V. V. Khanenko A. O. Danyliuk |
| author_facet | V. M. Kopchak L. O. Pererva R. V. Saliutin V. O. Kropelnytskyi I. V. Khomiak O. V. Duvalko V. P. Schkarban Yu. O. Khilko V. I. Trachuk V. V. Khanenko A. O. Danyliuk |
| author_sort | V. M. Kopchak |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective. To elaborate the measures system, which permit to reduce the occurrence of pancreatic fistula and other severe complications after performance of pancreato–duodenectomy.
Materials and methods. There were analyzed the results of treatment of 327 patients, in whom pancreato–duodenectomy was performed. In accordance to the scheme proposed, using the elaborated scale of risk for the postoperative pancreatic fistula occurrence with estimation of sarcopenia presence and application of certain prophylactic measures 98 patients were operated in period from November 2018 to December 2020 yr. (the main group). Into the control group 229 patients were included, operated on in the clinic from January 2015 to October 2018 yr. without estimation of risk for the pancreatic fistula occurrence and presence of sarcopenia. The method of pancreato–jejunoanastomosis formation was selected by operating surgeon.
Results. Postoperative complications have occurred in 94 (41.0%) patients of the control group and in 28 (28.6%) patients of the main group (c 2 = 4.56, p=0.03). Clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula of B Degree have occurred in 9 (9.2%) patients of the main group, what was statistically significantly lower, than in the control group, in which postoperative pancreatic fistula of B or C Degree have occurred in 64 (27.9%) patients (c 2 = 11.6, p=0.0007). Lethality was 2.2% in the control group and 1.02% – in the main one.
Conclusion. Introduction of the measures system elaborated have permitted to lower the postoperative pancreatic fistula rate statistically significantly from 27.9 to 9.2%, and of other postoperative complications – from 41.0 to 28.6% and lethality from 2.2 to 1.02%. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4630edaeee3944ac9ad96e4e6d2e7350 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 0023-2130 2522-1396 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | Liga-Inform ltd. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Клінічна хірургія |
| spelling | doaj-art-4630edaeee3944ac9ad96e4e6d2e73502025-08-20T02:53:13ZengLiga-Inform ltd.Клінічна хірургія0023-21302522-13962022-12-01893-4182410.26779/2522-1396.2022.3-4.181014The methods of prophylaxis of the pancreatic fistula occurrence after pancreato–duodenectomyV. M. Kopchak0L. O. Pererva1R. V. Saliutin2V. O. Kropelnytskyi3I. V. Khomiak4O. V. Duvalko5V. P. Schkarban6Yu. O. Khilko7V. I. Trachuk8V. V. Khanenko9A. O. Danyliuk10Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, KyivShalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, KyivShalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, KyivShalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, KyivShalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, KyivShalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, KyivShalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, KyivShalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, KyivShalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, KyivShalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, KyivShalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology, KyivObjective. To elaborate the measures system, which permit to reduce the occurrence of pancreatic fistula and other severe complications after performance of pancreato–duodenectomy. Materials and methods. There were analyzed the results of treatment of 327 patients, in whom pancreato–duodenectomy was performed. In accordance to the scheme proposed, using the elaborated scale of risk for the postoperative pancreatic fistula occurrence with estimation of sarcopenia presence and application of certain prophylactic measures 98 patients were operated in period from November 2018 to December 2020 yr. (the main group). Into the control group 229 patients were included, operated on in the clinic from January 2015 to October 2018 yr. without estimation of risk for the pancreatic fistula occurrence and presence of sarcopenia. The method of pancreato–jejunoanastomosis formation was selected by operating surgeon. Results. Postoperative complications have occurred in 94 (41.0%) patients of the control group and in 28 (28.6%) patients of the main group (c 2 = 4.56, p=0.03). Clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula of B Degree have occurred in 9 (9.2%) patients of the main group, what was statistically significantly lower, than in the control group, in which postoperative pancreatic fistula of B or C Degree have occurred in 64 (27.9%) patients (c 2 = 11.6, p=0.0007). Lethality was 2.2% in the control group and 1.02% – in the main one. Conclusion. Introduction of the measures system elaborated have permitted to lower the postoperative pancreatic fistula rate statistically significantly from 27.9 to 9.2%, and of other postoperative complications – from 41.0 to 28.6% and lethality from 2.2 to 1.02%.https://hirurgiya.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1014sarcopeniapancreato–duodenectomyscale of risk for the postoperative pancreatic fistula occurrence |
| spellingShingle | V. M. Kopchak L. O. Pererva R. V. Saliutin V. O. Kropelnytskyi I. V. Khomiak O. V. Duvalko V. P. Schkarban Yu. O. Khilko V. I. Trachuk V. V. Khanenko A. O. Danyliuk The methods of prophylaxis of the pancreatic fistula occurrence after pancreato–duodenectomy Клінічна хірургія sarcopenia pancreato–duodenectomy scale of risk for the postoperative pancreatic fistula occurrence |
| title | The methods of prophylaxis of the pancreatic fistula occurrence after pancreato–duodenectomy |
| title_full | The methods of prophylaxis of the pancreatic fistula occurrence after pancreato–duodenectomy |
| title_fullStr | The methods of prophylaxis of the pancreatic fistula occurrence after pancreato–duodenectomy |
| title_full_unstemmed | The methods of prophylaxis of the pancreatic fistula occurrence after pancreato–duodenectomy |
| title_short | The methods of prophylaxis of the pancreatic fistula occurrence after pancreato–duodenectomy |
| title_sort | methods of prophylaxis of the pancreatic fistula occurrence after pancreato duodenectomy |
| topic | sarcopenia pancreato–duodenectomy scale of risk for the postoperative pancreatic fistula occurrence |
| url | https://hirurgiya.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1014 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vmkopchak themethodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT lopererva themethodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT rvsaliutin themethodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT vokropelnytskyi themethodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT ivkhomiak themethodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT ovduvalko themethodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT vpschkarban themethodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT yuokhilko themethodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT vitrachuk themethodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT vvkhanenko themethodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT aodanyliuk themethodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT vmkopchak methodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT lopererva methodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT rvsaliutin methodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT vokropelnytskyi methodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT ivkhomiak methodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT ovduvalko methodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT vpschkarban methodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT yuokhilko methodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT vitrachuk methodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT vvkhanenko methodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy AT aodanyliuk methodsofprophylaxisofthepancreaticfistulaoccurrenceafterpancreatoduodenectomy |