Zoonoses and One Health: A Review of the Literature

Background. One health is a concept that was officially adopted by international organizations and scholarly bodies in 1984. It is the notion of combining human, animal, and environmental components to address global health challenges that have an ecological interconnectedness. Methods. A cross-sect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Satesh Bidaisee, Calum N. L. Macpherson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Parasitology Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/874345
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849406898484281344
author Satesh Bidaisee
Calum N. L. Macpherson
author_facet Satesh Bidaisee
Calum N. L. Macpherson
author_sort Satesh Bidaisee
collection DOAJ
description Background. One health is a concept that was officially adopted by international organizations and scholarly bodies in 1984. It is the notion of combining human, animal, and environmental components to address global health challenges that have an ecological interconnectedness. Methods. A cross-sectional study of the available literature cited was conducted from January 1984 when the one health concept was adopted till December 2012 to examine the role of the one health approach towards zoonoses. Inclusion criteria included publications, professional presentations, funding allocations, official documentation books, and book chapters, and exclusion criteria included those citations written outside the period of review. Results. A total of 737 resources met the inclusion criteria and were considered in this review. Resources showed a continuous upward trend for the years from 2006 to 2012. The predominant resources were journal publications with environmental health as the significant scope focus for one health. There was also an emphasis on the distribution of the work from developed countries. All categories of years, resources, scopes, and country locale differed from the means (P=0.000). Year of initiative, scope, and country locale showed a dependent relationship (P=0.022, P=0.003, and P=0.021, resp.). Conclusion. Our findings demonstrate the rapid growth in embracing the concept of one health, particularly in developed countries over the past six years. The advantages and benefits of this approach in tackling zoonoses are manifold, yet they are still not seemingly being embraced in developing countries where zoonoses have the greatest impact.
format Article
id doaj-art-4629a5347f364aaf9ef6463697134f2a
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0023
2090-0031
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Parasitology Research
spelling doaj-art-4629a5347f364aaf9ef6463697134f2a2025-08-20T03:36:14ZengWileyJournal of Parasitology Research2090-00232090-00312014-01-01201410.1155/2014/874345874345Zoonoses and One Health: A Review of the LiteratureSatesh Bidaisee0Calum N. L. Macpherson1Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, St. George’s University, School of Medicine, St. George’s, GrenadaWindward Islands Research and Education Foundation, St. George’s, GrenadaBackground. One health is a concept that was officially adopted by international organizations and scholarly bodies in 1984. It is the notion of combining human, animal, and environmental components to address global health challenges that have an ecological interconnectedness. Methods. A cross-sectional study of the available literature cited was conducted from January 1984 when the one health concept was adopted till December 2012 to examine the role of the one health approach towards zoonoses. Inclusion criteria included publications, professional presentations, funding allocations, official documentation books, and book chapters, and exclusion criteria included those citations written outside the period of review. Results. A total of 737 resources met the inclusion criteria and were considered in this review. Resources showed a continuous upward trend for the years from 2006 to 2012. The predominant resources were journal publications with environmental health as the significant scope focus for one health. There was also an emphasis on the distribution of the work from developed countries. All categories of years, resources, scopes, and country locale differed from the means (P=0.000). Year of initiative, scope, and country locale showed a dependent relationship (P=0.022, P=0.003, and P=0.021, resp.). Conclusion. Our findings demonstrate the rapid growth in embracing the concept of one health, particularly in developed countries over the past six years. The advantages and benefits of this approach in tackling zoonoses are manifold, yet they are still not seemingly being embraced in developing countries where zoonoses have the greatest impact.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/874345
spellingShingle Satesh Bidaisee
Calum N. L. Macpherson
Zoonoses and One Health: A Review of the Literature
Journal of Parasitology Research
title Zoonoses and One Health: A Review of the Literature
title_full Zoonoses and One Health: A Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Zoonoses and One Health: A Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Zoonoses and One Health: A Review of the Literature
title_short Zoonoses and One Health: A Review of the Literature
title_sort zoonoses and one health a review of the literature
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/874345
work_keys_str_mv AT sateshbidaisee zoonosesandonehealthareviewoftheliterature
AT calumnlmacpherson zoonosesandonehealthareviewoftheliterature