Constructivist Approach Analysis on the Boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic

The 2022 Winter Olympics Beijing have drawn a lot of attention since a number of important nations have put a diplomatic boycott on the event. The United States, Britain, and Canada were among the nations that enacted a diplomatic embargo. Using a constructivism theory approach, this research will...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kurnia Rafif Shanika, Muhammad Indrawan Jatmika
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur 2022-12-01
Series:WIMAYA
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wimaya.upnjatim.ac.id/index.php/wimaya/article/view/74
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849421403484323840
author Kurnia Rafif Shanika
Muhammad Indrawan Jatmika
author_facet Kurnia Rafif Shanika
Muhammad Indrawan Jatmika
author_sort Kurnia Rafif Shanika
collection DOAJ
description The 2022 Winter Olympics Beijing have drawn a lot of attention since a number of important nations have put a diplomatic boycott on the event. The United States, Britain, and Canada were among the nations that enacted a diplomatic embargo. Using a constructivism theory approach, this research will attempt to give an analytical study of the occurrence of this boycott. Instead of adopting traditional approaches like liberalism and realism, the author believes that this approach offers a fresh viewpoint on this phenomenon. From a constructivist perspective, the nation that imposed a diplomatic boycott on the Beijing 2022 Olympics was regarded as having constructive elements that encourage such behavior. Every nation has its own factors that will shift the way that nations make decisions. The main argument of this paper is that there are three main factors that construct the boycott behavior of these countries. The first is the construction of friend vs foe between the boycotting countries and China as the host country. Boycott countries that share ideological similarities construct a point of view that China is an enemy to them because of their differences. The second argument is the existence of China's construction as a country that perpetrates human rights violations. This prompted the boycotting countries to protest with the boycott. The third argument is the existence of bilateral problems between countries. Some countries, such as Canada, have bilateral problems with China, which then encourage the construction of boycott behavior that occurs.
format Article
id doaj-art-461c0786f0fb43558f438f1d445b0939
institution Kabale University
issn 2722-3760
language English
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
record_format Article
series WIMAYA
spelling doaj-art-461c0786f0fb43558f438f1d445b09392025-08-20T03:31:28ZengUniversitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa TimurWIMAYA2722-37602022-12-0130210.33005/wimaya.v3i02.7431Constructivist Approach Analysis on the Boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter OlympicKurnia Rafif Shanika0Muhammad Indrawan Jatmika1University of Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa TimurUniversity of Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur The 2022 Winter Olympics Beijing have drawn a lot of attention since a number of important nations have put a diplomatic boycott on the event. The United States, Britain, and Canada were among the nations that enacted a diplomatic embargo. Using a constructivism theory approach, this research will attempt to give an analytical study of the occurrence of this boycott. Instead of adopting traditional approaches like liberalism and realism, the author believes that this approach offers a fresh viewpoint on this phenomenon. From a constructivist perspective, the nation that imposed a diplomatic boycott on the Beijing 2022 Olympics was regarded as having constructive elements that encourage such behavior. Every nation has its own factors that will shift the way that nations make decisions. The main argument of this paper is that there are three main factors that construct the boycott behavior of these countries. The first is the construction of friend vs foe between the boycotting countries and China as the host country. Boycott countries that share ideological similarities construct a point of view that China is an enemy to them because of their differences. The second argument is the existence of China's construction as a country that perpetrates human rights violations. This prompted the boycotting countries to protest with the boycott. The third argument is the existence of bilateral problems between countries. Some countries, such as Canada, have bilateral problems with China, which then encourage the construction of boycott behavior that occurs. https://wimaya.upnjatim.ac.id/index.php/wimaya/article/view/742022 Winter OlympicsBoycottConstructivismChinathe United StatesCanada
spellingShingle Kurnia Rafif Shanika
Muhammad Indrawan Jatmika
Constructivist Approach Analysis on the Boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic
WIMAYA
2022 Winter Olympics
Boycott
Constructivism
China
the United States
Canada
title Constructivist Approach Analysis on the Boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic
title_full Constructivist Approach Analysis on the Boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic
title_fullStr Constructivist Approach Analysis on the Boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic
title_full_unstemmed Constructivist Approach Analysis on the Boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic
title_short Constructivist Approach Analysis on the Boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic
title_sort constructivist approach analysis on the boycott of the 2022 beijing winter olympic
topic 2022 Winter Olympics
Boycott
Constructivism
China
the United States
Canada
url https://wimaya.upnjatim.ac.id/index.php/wimaya/article/view/74
work_keys_str_mv AT kurniarafifshanika constructivistapproachanalysisontheboycottofthe2022beijingwinterolympic
AT muhammadindrawanjatmika constructivistapproachanalysisontheboycottofthe2022beijingwinterolympic