Evaluating Urban Park Utility in Seoul: A Distance-to-Area Discounting Model
This study proposes a novel method to assess urban park accessibility by incorporating perceived utility based on both park area and distance. Departing from conventional models that treat accessibility as a function of geometric proximity alone, we define park utility as a distance-discounted benef...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Land |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1449 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study proposes a novel method to assess urban park accessibility by incorporating perceived utility based on both park area and distance. Departing from conventional models that treat accessibility as a function of geometric proximity alone, we define park utility as a distance-discounted benefit of park area, thereby allowing for a more behaviorally grounded measure. A customized discounting function is introduced, where larger park sizes proportionally reduce perceived travel cost, and walking speed adjustments are applied based on demographic user profiles (children, adults, and older adults). The methodology was implemented using a Python-based v.3.12.9 geospatial workflow with network-based distance calculations between 18,614 census block groups and all urban parks in Seoul. Population-weighted utility scores were computed by integrating park size, distance, and age-specific mobility adjustments. The results reveal significant intra-urban disparities, with a citywide deficit of 4,066,046 m in population-weighted distance, particularly in areas with large populations but insufficient proximity to high-utility parks. Simulation analyses of 30 candidate sites demonstrate that strategic park placement can yield substantial utility improvements (maximum gain: 493,436 m), while indiscriminate expansion may not. These findings offer spatial decision support for optimizing limited public resources in urban green infrastructure planning and underscore the need to consider both park scale and user-specific walking behavior in evaluating accessibility. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2073-445X |