Comparison of Four Different Pain Relief Methods during Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled Study
BACKGROUND: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the most commonly used method for evaluating the anatomy and patency of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and is an important tool in the evaluation of infertility. The most frequent side effect is the pain associated with the procedure.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | Pain Research and Management |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/306248 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832564950152773632 |
|---|---|
| author | Bekir Serdar Unlu Mehmet Yilmazer Gulengul Koken Dagistan Tolga Arioz Ebru Unlu Elif Dogan Baki Cemile Kurttay Osman Karacin |
| author_facet | Bekir Serdar Unlu Mehmet Yilmazer Gulengul Koken Dagistan Tolga Arioz Ebru Unlu Elif Dogan Baki Cemile Kurttay Osman Karacin |
| author_sort | Bekir Serdar Unlu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BACKGROUND: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the most commonly used method for evaluating the anatomy and patency of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and is an important tool in the evaluation of infertility. The most frequent side effect is the pain associated with the procedure. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-45a6fa23e0734d7a849a30ccf9e0bd93 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1203-6765 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Pain Research and Management |
| spelling | doaj-art-45a6fa23e0734d7a849a30ccf9e0bd932025-02-03T01:09:43ZengWileyPain Research and Management1203-67652015-01-0120210711110.1155/2015/306248Comparison of Four Different Pain Relief Methods during Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled StudyBekir Serdar Unlu0Mehmet Yilmazer1Gulengul Koken2Dagistan Tolga Arioz3Ebru Unlu4Elif Dogan Baki5Cemile Kurttay6Osman Karacin7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, TurkeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, TurkeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, TurkeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, TurkeyDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, TurkeyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, TurkeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, TurkeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, TurkeyBACKGROUND: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the most commonly used method for evaluating the anatomy and patency of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and is an important tool in the evaluation of infertility. The most frequent side effect is the pain associated with the procedure.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/306248 |
| spellingShingle | Bekir Serdar Unlu Mehmet Yilmazer Gulengul Koken Dagistan Tolga Arioz Ebru Unlu Elif Dogan Baki Cemile Kurttay Osman Karacin Comparison of Four Different Pain Relief Methods during Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled Study Pain Research and Management |
| title | Comparison of Four Different Pain Relief Methods during Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled Study |
| title_full | Comparison of Four Different Pain Relief Methods during Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled Study |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Four Different Pain Relief Methods during Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Four Different Pain Relief Methods during Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled Study |
| title_short | Comparison of Four Different Pain Relief Methods during Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled Study |
| title_sort | comparison of four different pain relief methods during hysterosalpingography a randomized controlled study |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/306248 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bekirserdarunlu comparisonoffourdifferentpainreliefmethodsduringhysterosalpingographyarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT mehmetyilmazer comparisonoffourdifferentpainreliefmethodsduringhysterosalpingographyarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT gulengulkoken comparisonoffourdifferentpainreliefmethodsduringhysterosalpingographyarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT dagistantolgaarioz comparisonoffourdifferentpainreliefmethodsduringhysterosalpingographyarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT ebruunlu comparisonoffourdifferentpainreliefmethodsduringhysterosalpingographyarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT elifdoganbaki comparisonoffourdifferentpainreliefmethodsduringhysterosalpingographyarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT cemilekurttay comparisonoffourdifferentpainreliefmethodsduringhysterosalpingographyarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT osmankaracin comparisonoffourdifferentpainreliefmethodsduringhysterosalpingographyarandomizedcontrolledstudy |