Do delayed responses introduce bias in ecological momentary assessment? Evidence from comparisons between self-reported and objective physical activity

IntroductionDelayed responses are a common yet often overlooked aspect of participant compliance in ecological momentary assessment (EMA) research. This study investigated whether response delays introduce selection bias in the moments captured by EMA.MethodsParticipants (n = 339) self-reported thei...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefan Schneider, Meynard J. Toledo, Doerte U. Junghaenel, Joshua M. Smyth, Pey-Jiuan Lee, Sarah Goldstein, Olivia Pomeroy, Arthur A. Stone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1503411/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841561029896568832
author Stefan Schneider
Stefan Schneider
Stefan Schneider
Meynard J. Toledo
Doerte U. Junghaenel
Doerte U. Junghaenel
Doerte U. Junghaenel
Joshua M. Smyth
Pey-Jiuan Lee
Sarah Goldstein
Olivia Pomeroy
Arthur A. Stone
Arthur A. Stone
author_facet Stefan Schneider
Stefan Schneider
Stefan Schneider
Meynard J. Toledo
Doerte U. Junghaenel
Doerte U. Junghaenel
Doerte U. Junghaenel
Joshua M. Smyth
Pey-Jiuan Lee
Sarah Goldstein
Olivia Pomeroy
Arthur A. Stone
Arthur A. Stone
author_sort Stefan Schneider
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionDelayed responses are a common yet often overlooked aspect of participant compliance in ecological momentary assessment (EMA) research. This study investigated whether response delays introduce selection bias in the moments captured by EMA.MethodsParticipants (n = 339) self-reported their physical activity behaviors using EMA five times a day over 7 days while wearing a continuous physical activity monitor. The continuous activity monitor data provided an objective reference value to evaluate potential biases in delayed EMA self-reports.ResultsResults showed that participants were significantly more likely to delay EMA responses when they were prompted during higher levels of physical activity, and they subsequently reduced their activity levels, postponing their response until they were in a significantly less active state. There was no significant evidence that response delays systematically biased the levels of EMA reported activities, although delayed responses were associated with significantly more random errors in EMA reports (with small effect sizes).DiscussionThe results suggest that respondents self-select the moments for answering EMA surveys based on their current activity levels, but brief response delays do not translate into marked reductions in the quality of EMA data.
format Article
id doaj-art-458de0c5a99842dfbe32bd3bbc4df094
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-1078
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj-art-458de0c5a99842dfbe32bd3bbc4df0942025-01-03T06:47:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782025-01-011510.3389/fpsyg.2024.15034111503411Do delayed responses introduce bias in ecological momentary assessment? Evidence from comparisons between self-reported and objective physical activityStefan Schneider0Stefan Schneider1Stefan Schneider2Meynard J. Toledo3Doerte U. Junghaenel4Doerte U. Junghaenel5Doerte U. Junghaenel6Joshua M. Smyth7Pey-Jiuan Lee8Sarah Goldstein9Olivia Pomeroy10Arthur A. Stone11Arthur A. Stone12Dornsife Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDornsife Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDornsife Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United StatesDornsife Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDornsife Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDornsife Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDornsife Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesIntroductionDelayed responses are a common yet often overlooked aspect of participant compliance in ecological momentary assessment (EMA) research. This study investigated whether response delays introduce selection bias in the moments captured by EMA.MethodsParticipants (n = 339) self-reported their physical activity behaviors using EMA five times a day over 7 days while wearing a continuous physical activity monitor. The continuous activity monitor data provided an objective reference value to evaluate potential biases in delayed EMA self-reports.ResultsResults showed that participants were significantly more likely to delay EMA responses when they were prompted during higher levels of physical activity, and they subsequently reduced their activity levels, postponing their response until they were in a significantly less active state. There was no significant evidence that response delays systematically biased the levels of EMA reported activities, although delayed responses were associated with significantly more random errors in EMA reports (with small effect sizes).DiscussionThe results suggest that respondents self-select the moments for answering EMA surveys based on their current activity levels, but brief response delays do not translate into marked reductions in the quality of EMA data.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1503411/fullecological momentary assessment (EMA)ambulatory assessment (AA)physical activityresponse delaycomplianceexperience sampling method (ESM)
spellingShingle Stefan Schneider
Stefan Schneider
Stefan Schneider
Meynard J. Toledo
Doerte U. Junghaenel
Doerte U. Junghaenel
Doerte U. Junghaenel
Joshua M. Smyth
Pey-Jiuan Lee
Sarah Goldstein
Olivia Pomeroy
Arthur A. Stone
Arthur A. Stone
Do delayed responses introduce bias in ecological momentary assessment? Evidence from comparisons between self-reported and objective physical activity
Frontiers in Psychology
ecological momentary assessment (EMA)
ambulatory assessment (AA)
physical activity
response delay
compliance
experience sampling method (ESM)
title Do delayed responses introduce bias in ecological momentary assessment? Evidence from comparisons between self-reported and objective physical activity
title_full Do delayed responses introduce bias in ecological momentary assessment? Evidence from comparisons between self-reported and objective physical activity
title_fullStr Do delayed responses introduce bias in ecological momentary assessment? Evidence from comparisons between self-reported and objective physical activity
title_full_unstemmed Do delayed responses introduce bias in ecological momentary assessment? Evidence from comparisons between self-reported and objective physical activity
title_short Do delayed responses introduce bias in ecological momentary assessment? Evidence from comparisons between self-reported and objective physical activity
title_sort do delayed responses introduce bias in ecological momentary assessment evidence from comparisons between self reported and objective physical activity
topic ecological momentary assessment (EMA)
ambulatory assessment (AA)
physical activity
response delay
compliance
experience sampling method (ESM)
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1503411/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanschneider dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT stefanschneider dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT stefanschneider dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT meynardjtoledo dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT doerteujunghaenel dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT doerteujunghaenel dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT doerteujunghaenel dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT joshuamsmyth dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT peyjiuanlee dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT sarahgoldstein dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT oliviapomeroy dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT arthurastone dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity
AT arthurastone dodelayedresponsesintroducebiasinecologicalmomentaryassessmentevidencefromcomparisonsbetweenselfreportedandobjectivephysicalactivity