The impact of midsole hardness on joint angles and plantar loading during running at multiple running velocities

IntroductionSuitable midsoles of running shoes provide better protection for the feet. However, previous studies on the effect of midsole hardness on running biomechanics have ignored the important factor of running velocity and have not reached consistent results. This study set a running velocity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luming Yang, Xinye Liu, Yuan Liu, Jing Liu, Shiyang Yan, Guoxia Fei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1641883/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849397110456188928
author Luming Yang
Luming Yang
Xinye Liu
Xinye Liu
Yuan Liu
Yuan Liu
Jing Liu
Shiyang Yan
Guoxia Fei
author_facet Luming Yang
Luming Yang
Xinye Liu
Xinye Liu
Yuan Liu
Yuan Liu
Jing Liu
Shiyang Yan
Guoxia Fei
author_sort Luming Yang
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionSuitable midsoles of running shoes provide better protection for the feet. However, previous studies on the effect of midsole hardness on running biomechanics have ignored the important factor of running velocity and have not reached consistent results. This study set a running velocity with six gradients and aimed to investigate whether the midsole hardness would have a different impact on lower limb joint angles and plantar loading in different velocity ranges.MethodsEight male runners ran on a treadmill under 12 conditions (six velocities: self-selected velocity (SSV), 120% SSV, 140% SSV, 160% SSV, 180% SSV, and 200% SSV; two midsole hardness levels: soft and hard). The Noraxon Ultium® insole and Motion IMUs were used to collect data on joint angles and plantar loading. Two-way repeated measures (6 velocities × 2 hardnesses) and paired t-tests were used.ResultsThe study showed that at SSV and 120% SSV, the maximum ankle inversion angle in soft midsoles is significantly smaller than in hard midsoles. At 180 and 200% SSV, the maximum hip abduction angle in the swing phase and the maximum force in the metatarsal region in soft midsoles are significantly greater than in hard midsoles, which might lead to a loss of stability and an increased risk of injury in the forefoot. Midsole hardness could have a nonlinear effect on joints and plantar loading as running velocity changed.ConclusionThe study provided useful information for reducing the potential incidence of running-related injuries based on midsole hardness and running velocity conditions. When considering the impact of midsole hardness on running injury, researchers should pay particular attention to ankle joint motion during 100–120% SSV and hip, ankle joint motion, and metatarsal and arch loading during 180–200% SSV.
format Article
id doaj-art-45749439b4f840dc9f695699ede1fdcd
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-2565
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj-art-45749439b4f840dc9f695699ede1fdcd2025-08-20T03:39:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652025-08-011310.3389/fpubh.2025.16418831641883The impact of midsole hardness on joint angles and plantar loading during running at multiple running velocitiesLuming Yang0Luming Yang1Xinye Liu2Xinye Liu3Yuan Liu4Yuan Liu5Jing Liu6Shiyang Yan7Guoxia Fei8National Engineering Laboratory for Clean Technology of Leather Manufacture, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaLaboratory of Intelligent Clothing & Sport Biomechanics, College of Biomass Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaNational Engineering Laboratory for Clean Technology of Leather Manufacture, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaLaboratory of Intelligent Clothing & Sport Biomechanics, College of Biomass Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaNational Engineering Laboratory for Clean Technology of Leather Manufacture, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaLaboratory of Intelligent Clothing & Sport Biomechanics, College of Biomass Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaSchool of Fashion and Textiles, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, ChinaLaboratory of Intelligent Clothing & Sport Biomechanics, College of Biomass Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, Polymer Institute, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaIntroductionSuitable midsoles of running shoes provide better protection for the feet. However, previous studies on the effect of midsole hardness on running biomechanics have ignored the important factor of running velocity and have not reached consistent results. This study set a running velocity with six gradients and aimed to investigate whether the midsole hardness would have a different impact on lower limb joint angles and plantar loading in different velocity ranges.MethodsEight male runners ran on a treadmill under 12 conditions (six velocities: self-selected velocity (SSV), 120% SSV, 140% SSV, 160% SSV, 180% SSV, and 200% SSV; two midsole hardness levels: soft and hard). The Noraxon Ultium® insole and Motion IMUs were used to collect data on joint angles and plantar loading. Two-way repeated measures (6 velocities × 2 hardnesses) and paired t-tests were used.ResultsThe study showed that at SSV and 120% SSV, the maximum ankle inversion angle in soft midsoles is significantly smaller than in hard midsoles. At 180 and 200% SSV, the maximum hip abduction angle in the swing phase and the maximum force in the metatarsal region in soft midsoles are significantly greater than in hard midsoles, which might lead to a loss of stability and an increased risk of injury in the forefoot. Midsole hardness could have a nonlinear effect on joints and plantar loading as running velocity changed.ConclusionThe study provided useful information for reducing the potential incidence of running-related injuries based on midsole hardness and running velocity conditions. When considering the impact of midsole hardness on running injury, researchers should pay particular attention to ankle joint motion during 100–120% SSV and hip, ankle joint motion, and metatarsal and arch loading during 180–200% SSV.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1641883/fullgait analysisspeedsshoesjoint angleplantar loading patternfootwear biomechanics
spellingShingle Luming Yang
Luming Yang
Xinye Liu
Xinye Liu
Yuan Liu
Yuan Liu
Jing Liu
Shiyang Yan
Guoxia Fei
The impact of midsole hardness on joint angles and plantar loading during running at multiple running velocities
Frontiers in Public Health
gait analysis
speeds
shoes
joint angle
plantar loading pattern
footwear biomechanics
title The impact of midsole hardness on joint angles and plantar loading during running at multiple running velocities
title_full The impact of midsole hardness on joint angles and plantar loading during running at multiple running velocities
title_fullStr The impact of midsole hardness on joint angles and plantar loading during running at multiple running velocities
title_full_unstemmed The impact of midsole hardness on joint angles and plantar loading during running at multiple running velocities
title_short The impact of midsole hardness on joint angles and plantar loading during running at multiple running velocities
title_sort impact of midsole hardness on joint angles and plantar loading during running at multiple running velocities
topic gait analysis
speeds
shoes
joint angle
plantar loading pattern
footwear biomechanics
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1641883/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lumingyang theimpactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT lumingyang theimpactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT xinyeliu theimpactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT xinyeliu theimpactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT yuanliu theimpactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT yuanliu theimpactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT jingliu theimpactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT shiyangyan theimpactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT guoxiafei theimpactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT lumingyang impactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT lumingyang impactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT xinyeliu impactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT xinyeliu impactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT yuanliu impactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT yuanliu impactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT jingliu impactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT shiyangyan impactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities
AT guoxiafei impactofmidsolehardnessonjointanglesandplantarloadingduringrunningatmultiplerunningvelocities