Magic involvement: The codification of possession in Middle Dutch healing recipes and charms

It has long been debated whether recipes and charms represent separate textual genres. They have much in common in terms of structure, linguistic features and communicative purpose. The present paper approaches the issue from a linguistic perspective: it focusses on possessive constructions, and pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Letizia Vezzosi
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Ledizioni 2024-09-01
Series:Filologia Germanica
Online Access:https://www.ledijournals.com/ojs/index.php/filologiagermanica/article/view/2579
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849431351022845952
author Letizia Vezzosi
author_facet Letizia Vezzosi
author_sort Letizia Vezzosi
collection DOAJ
description It has long been debated whether recipes and charms represent separate textual genres. They have much in common in terms of structure, linguistic features and communicative purpose. The present paper approaches the issue from a linguistic perspective: it focusses on possessive constructions, and particularly on the question how body part nouns are syntactically incorporated in clauses. Empirically, this study is based on a corpus of Middle Dutch medical treatises and healing charm from the fifteenth century. It shows that charms and recipes presuppose a different communicative pact between the writer – i.e. the practitioner or the agician – and the patient. The resulting differences sufficiently substantial to warrant the conclusion that recipes and charms should be considered as different text types.
format Article
id doaj-art-4505e897449641f6b9ee698712df6d02
institution Kabale University
issn 2036-8992
language deu
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Ledizioni
record_format Article
series Filologia Germanica
spelling doaj-art-4505e897449641f6b9ee698712df6d022025-08-20T03:27:40ZdeuLedizioniFilologia Germanica2036-89922024-09-01910.14672/fg.v9i.2579Magic involvement: The codification of possession in Middle Dutch healing recipes and charmsLetizia Vezzosi0Dipartimento di Lingue, Letterature e Studi Interculturali, Università di Firenze, Italia It has long been debated whether recipes and charms represent separate textual genres. They have much in common in terms of structure, linguistic features and communicative purpose. The present paper approaches the issue from a linguistic perspective: it focusses on possessive constructions, and particularly on the question how body part nouns are syntactically incorporated in clauses. Empirically, this study is based on a corpus of Middle Dutch medical treatises and healing charm from the fifteenth century. It shows that charms and recipes presuppose a different communicative pact between the writer – i.e. the practitioner or the agician – and the patient. The resulting differences sufficiently substantial to warrant the conclusion that recipes and charms should be considered as different text types. https://www.ledijournals.com/ojs/index.php/filologiagermanica/article/view/2579
spellingShingle Letizia Vezzosi
Magic involvement: The codification of possession in Middle Dutch healing recipes and charms
Filologia Germanica
title Magic involvement: The codification of possession in Middle Dutch healing recipes and charms
title_full Magic involvement: The codification of possession in Middle Dutch healing recipes and charms
title_fullStr Magic involvement: The codification of possession in Middle Dutch healing recipes and charms
title_full_unstemmed Magic involvement: The codification of possession in Middle Dutch healing recipes and charms
title_short Magic involvement: The codification of possession in Middle Dutch healing recipes and charms
title_sort magic involvement the codification of possession in middle dutch healing recipes and charms
url https://www.ledijournals.com/ojs/index.php/filologiagermanica/article/view/2579
work_keys_str_mv AT letiziavezzosi magicinvolvementthecodificationofpossessioninmiddledutchhealingrecipesandcharms