Evaluation of the Effects of Different Types of Resin Cement Systems on the Push-Out Bond Strength of the Fiber Post to Intracanal Dentin in Anterior Primary Teeth

Background. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of using three different resin cements on push-out bond strength (PBS) of fiber posts to root canal dentin of primary teeth. Methods. Fifty primary canines were randomly divided into five experimental groups according to the type of the luting age...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Nozari, Boshra Rasoolzade, Zahra Jowkar, Seyed Ahmadreza Hamidi, Mohammad Jowkar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8645083
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850110843136507904
author Ali Nozari
Boshra Rasoolzade
Zahra Jowkar
Seyed Ahmadreza Hamidi
Mohammad Jowkar
author_facet Ali Nozari
Boshra Rasoolzade
Zahra Jowkar
Seyed Ahmadreza Hamidi
Mohammad Jowkar
author_sort Ali Nozari
collection DOAJ
description Background. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of using three different resin cements on push-out bond strength (PBS) of fiber posts to root canal dentin of primary teeth. Methods. Fifty primary canines were randomly divided into five experimental groups according to the type of the luting agent used for fiber post cementation after endodontic treatment and post space preparation as the following: Group 1: glass ionomer cement (GIC), Group 2: flowable resin composite, Group 3: etch and rinse (E&R) resin cement, Group 4: self-etch (SE) resin cement, Group 5: self-adhesive (SA) resin cement. The PBS values of the cemented fiber posts to root canals were measured. The data were statistically analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Results. The highest mean PBS value was observed in Group 4 (SE resin cement), followed by Group 3 (E&R resin cement), and the lowest PBS value belonged to Group 1 (GIC), followed by Group 5 (p-values < 0.05). The mean PBS of Group 3 (E&R resin cement) was significantly higher than those of Groups 1 (GIC), 2 (flowable resin composite), and 5 (SA resin cement) (p-values < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the mean PBS of GIC and SA resin cement (p-value >0/05). Conclusion. Using SE resin cement for fiber post cementation in primary anterior teeth showed the best results, followed by E&R resin cement. The lowest PBS was observed for GIC, followed by SA resin cement.
format Article
id doaj-art-44eee3ce915d4550a3ee3b92a228773b
institution OA Journals
issn 1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-44eee3ce915d4550a3ee3b92a228773b2025-08-20T02:37:46ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87362023-01-01202310.1155/2023/8645083Evaluation of the Effects of Different Types of Resin Cement Systems on the Push-Out Bond Strength of the Fiber Post to Intracanal Dentin in Anterior Primary TeethAli Nozari0Boshra Rasoolzade1Zahra Jowkar2Seyed Ahmadreza Hamidi3Mohammad Jowkar4Department of Pediatric DentistryDepartment of Pediatric DentistryOral and Dental Disease Research CenterDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryDepartment of ProsthodonticsBackground. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of using three different resin cements on push-out bond strength (PBS) of fiber posts to root canal dentin of primary teeth. Methods. Fifty primary canines were randomly divided into five experimental groups according to the type of the luting agent used for fiber post cementation after endodontic treatment and post space preparation as the following: Group 1: glass ionomer cement (GIC), Group 2: flowable resin composite, Group 3: etch and rinse (E&R) resin cement, Group 4: self-etch (SE) resin cement, Group 5: self-adhesive (SA) resin cement. The PBS values of the cemented fiber posts to root canals were measured. The data were statistically analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Results. The highest mean PBS value was observed in Group 4 (SE resin cement), followed by Group 3 (E&R resin cement), and the lowest PBS value belonged to Group 1 (GIC), followed by Group 5 (p-values < 0.05). The mean PBS of Group 3 (E&R resin cement) was significantly higher than those of Groups 1 (GIC), 2 (flowable resin composite), and 5 (SA resin cement) (p-values < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the mean PBS of GIC and SA resin cement (p-value >0/05). Conclusion. Using SE resin cement for fiber post cementation in primary anterior teeth showed the best results, followed by E&R resin cement. The lowest PBS was observed for GIC, followed by SA resin cement.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8645083
spellingShingle Ali Nozari
Boshra Rasoolzade
Zahra Jowkar
Seyed Ahmadreza Hamidi
Mohammad Jowkar
Evaluation of the Effects of Different Types of Resin Cement Systems on the Push-Out Bond Strength of the Fiber Post to Intracanal Dentin in Anterior Primary Teeth
International Journal of Dentistry
title Evaluation of the Effects of Different Types of Resin Cement Systems on the Push-Out Bond Strength of the Fiber Post to Intracanal Dentin in Anterior Primary Teeth
title_full Evaluation of the Effects of Different Types of Resin Cement Systems on the Push-Out Bond Strength of the Fiber Post to Intracanal Dentin in Anterior Primary Teeth
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Effects of Different Types of Resin Cement Systems on the Push-Out Bond Strength of the Fiber Post to Intracanal Dentin in Anterior Primary Teeth
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Effects of Different Types of Resin Cement Systems on the Push-Out Bond Strength of the Fiber Post to Intracanal Dentin in Anterior Primary Teeth
title_short Evaluation of the Effects of Different Types of Resin Cement Systems on the Push-Out Bond Strength of the Fiber Post to Intracanal Dentin in Anterior Primary Teeth
title_sort evaluation of the effects of different types of resin cement systems on the push out bond strength of the fiber post to intracanal dentin in anterior primary teeth
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8645083
work_keys_str_mv AT alinozari evaluationoftheeffectsofdifferenttypesofresincementsystemsonthepushoutbondstrengthofthefiberposttointracanaldentininanteriorprimaryteeth
AT boshrarasoolzade evaluationoftheeffectsofdifferenttypesofresincementsystemsonthepushoutbondstrengthofthefiberposttointracanaldentininanteriorprimaryteeth
AT zahrajowkar evaluationoftheeffectsofdifferenttypesofresincementsystemsonthepushoutbondstrengthofthefiberposttointracanaldentininanteriorprimaryteeth
AT seyedahmadrezahamidi evaluationoftheeffectsofdifferenttypesofresincementsystemsonthepushoutbondstrengthofthefiberposttointracanaldentininanteriorprimaryteeth
AT mohammadjowkar evaluationoftheeffectsofdifferenttypesofresincementsystemsonthepushoutbondstrengthofthefiberposttointracanaldentininanteriorprimaryteeth