Three Aspects of the Phenomenon of Science: In Search for Unity among Sociologists

Introduction. In today’s globalising world, science acquires a crucial importance: integrating humanity within the framework of solving global problems, it becomes one of the leading factors in social development, facilitating work and diversifying leisure time, as well as serving as an instrument o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. G. Popova, E. V. Biricheva, T. A. Beavitt
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University 2018-12-01
Series:Образование и наука
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/1034
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849405175120265216
author N. G. Popova
E. V. Biricheva
T. A. Beavitt
author_facet N. G. Popova
E. V. Biricheva
T. A. Beavitt
author_sort N. G. Popova
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. In today’s globalising world, science acquires a crucial importance: integrating humanity within the framework of solving global problems, it becomes one of the leading factors in social development, facilitating work and diversifying leisure time, as well as serving as an instrument of transformations in the political sphere. Undoubtedly, the social aspects of contemporary science are capturing the attention of a huge number of researchers. However, it is not clear that all areas of the sociology of science treat the object of their study in the same way.Aim. A lack of reflection on the unity or otherwise in the understanding of the essence of science in the various fields of sociological research makes it difficult to compare different theories of the institutional, cultural, social and communicative contexts of scientific development. An urgent methodological task therefore consists in developing an understanding of the various definitions of the concept of “science” used in the framework of contemporary sociological analysis of this phenomenon.Results and scientific novelty. In this paper, two dominant sociological views on science – as an experimental-mathematical approach to cognising the world and as a system of representations in general – are compared. We conclude that while researchers studying institutional aspects of science tend to interpret it in terms of the “heritage” of post-Enlightenment European rationalism, constructionist and communicatively-oriented researchers tend to approach science as the system of knowledge and cognition that is formed in any human society, having its own specific sociocultural features in each respective case. While each of these two approaches undoubtedly has its own methodological potential, in order to provide such a diverse field of studies with a common ground, it would be necessary to balance them with a third aspect. We argue that this balancing role, since both common for all mankind and unique for every culture, could be played by Heidegger’s conceptualisation of science as “the theory of the real”.Practical significance. In order to avoid a pluralism of incompatible theories, it is important to continually pose the question “what is the object of study when conducting a sociological study of various scientific phenomena?” – as well as to understand the “limits of applicability” of the particular interpretation of science on which basis sociological analysis proceeds.
format Article
id doaj-art-44d84bbd3c0d4c2ea52d7c6d8b31d730
institution Kabale University
issn 1994-5639
2310-5828
language Russian
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
record_format Article
series Образование и наука
spelling doaj-art-44d84bbd3c0d4c2ea52d7c6d8b31d7302025-08-20T03:36:45ZrusRussian State Vocational Pedagogical UniversityОбразование и наука1994-56392310-58282018-12-01209355510.17853/1994-5639-2018-9-35-55749Three Aspects of the Phenomenon of Science: In Search for Unity among SociologistsN. G. Popova0E. V. Biricheva1T. A. Beavitt2Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesInstitute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesInstitute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; The ‘Global Village Bard’ Organisation, Russia – UKIntroduction. In today’s globalising world, science acquires a crucial importance: integrating humanity within the framework of solving global problems, it becomes one of the leading factors in social development, facilitating work and diversifying leisure time, as well as serving as an instrument of transformations in the political sphere. Undoubtedly, the social aspects of contemporary science are capturing the attention of a huge number of researchers. However, it is not clear that all areas of the sociology of science treat the object of their study in the same way.Aim. A lack of reflection on the unity or otherwise in the understanding of the essence of science in the various fields of sociological research makes it difficult to compare different theories of the institutional, cultural, social and communicative contexts of scientific development. An urgent methodological task therefore consists in developing an understanding of the various definitions of the concept of “science” used in the framework of contemporary sociological analysis of this phenomenon.Results and scientific novelty. In this paper, two dominant sociological views on science – as an experimental-mathematical approach to cognising the world and as a system of representations in general – are compared. We conclude that while researchers studying institutional aspects of science tend to interpret it in terms of the “heritage” of post-Enlightenment European rationalism, constructionist and communicatively-oriented researchers tend to approach science as the system of knowledge and cognition that is formed in any human society, having its own specific sociocultural features in each respective case. While each of these two approaches undoubtedly has its own methodological potential, in order to provide such a diverse field of studies with a common ground, it would be necessary to balance them with a third aspect. We argue that this balancing role, since both common for all mankind and unique for every culture, could be played by Heidegger’s conceptualisation of science as “the theory of the real”.Practical significance. In order to avoid a pluralism of incompatible theories, it is important to continually pose the question “what is the object of study when conducting a sociological study of various scientific phenomena?” – as well as to understand the “limits of applicability” of the particular interpretation of science on which basis sociological analysis proceeds.https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/1034sociology of sciencesocial institutions of sciencegeneration of scientific knowledgeconcept of sciencephilosophy of scienceexperimental and mathematical knowledgeknowledge systemtheory of the real
spellingShingle N. G. Popova
E. V. Biricheva
T. A. Beavitt
Three Aspects of the Phenomenon of Science: In Search for Unity among Sociologists
Образование и наука
sociology of science
social institutions of science
generation of scientific knowledge
concept of science
philosophy of science
experimental and mathematical knowledge
knowledge system
theory of the real
title Three Aspects of the Phenomenon of Science: In Search for Unity among Sociologists
title_full Three Aspects of the Phenomenon of Science: In Search for Unity among Sociologists
title_fullStr Three Aspects of the Phenomenon of Science: In Search for Unity among Sociologists
title_full_unstemmed Three Aspects of the Phenomenon of Science: In Search for Unity among Sociologists
title_short Three Aspects of the Phenomenon of Science: In Search for Unity among Sociologists
title_sort three aspects of the phenomenon of science in search for unity among sociologists
topic sociology of science
social institutions of science
generation of scientific knowledge
concept of science
philosophy of science
experimental and mathematical knowledge
knowledge system
theory of the real
url https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/1034
work_keys_str_mv AT ngpopova threeaspectsofthephenomenonofscienceinsearchforunityamongsociologists
AT evbiricheva threeaspectsofthephenomenonofscienceinsearchforunityamongsociologists
AT tabeavitt threeaspectsofthephenomenonofscienceinsearchforunityamongsociologists