Patient involvement in quality improvement: a survey comparing naturalistic and reflective approaches
Background This study investigates reflective and naturalistic approaches to patient involvement in quality improvement. The reflective approach, using, for example, interviews, provides insights into patient needs and demands to support an established improvement agenda. The naturalistic approach,...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Ida Gremyr, Mattias Elg |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open Quality |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/2/e001981.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Identification and Categorization of the Distinct Purposes Underpinning the Use of Digital Health Care Self-Monitoring: Qualitative Study of Stakeholders in the Health Care Ecosystem
by: Mattias Elg, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
iNaturalist and Structured Mammal Surveys Reflect Similar Species Richness but Capture Different Species Pools Across the United States
by: Daniel J. Herrera, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
The influence of digitalisation on the role of quality professionals and their practices
by: Jason Martin, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Translating policy guidelines: a multiple case study of disease prevention in Sweden
by: Mattias Elg, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
A Comparison of Butterfly Diversity Results between iNaturalist and Expert Surveys in Eastern Oklahoma
by: Alexander J. Harman, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01)