Constitution, Non-Causal Explanation, and Demarcation

In philosophy of science, constitutive explanations have attracted much attention since Craver’s influential book Explaining the Brain (2007). His Mutual Manipulability (MM) theory of constitution aimed to explicate constitution as a non-causal explanatory relation and to demarcate between constitue...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorenzo Casini, Michael Baumgartner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Michigan Publishing 2025-04-01
Series:Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy
Online Access:https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article/id/6924/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850267041546633216
author Lorenzo Casini
Michael Baumgartner
author_facet Lorenzo Casini
Michael Baumgartner
author_sort Lorenzo Casini
collection DOAJ
description In philosophy of science, constitutive explanations have attracted much attention since Craver’s influential book Explaining the Brain (2007). His Mutual Manipulability (MM) theory of constitution aimed to explicate constitution as a non-causal explanatory relation and to demarcate between constituents and non-constituents. But MM received decisive criticism. In response, Craver et al. (2021) have recently proposed a new theory, called Matched Interlevel Experiments (MIE), which is currently gaining traction in various fields. The authors claim that MIE retains “the spirit of MM without conceptual confusion.” Our paper argues that this claim is not borne out: neither does MIE meet MM’s objectives nor is it free of conceptual confusion. At the same time, we show that it is possible to meet MM’s objectives in a conceptually sound manner—by adopting the so-called No De-Coupling theory of constitution.
format Article
id doaj-art-446df3f41065409caf2769cbd4cc6d61
institution OA Journals
issn 2330-4014
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Michigan Publishing
record_format Article
series Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy
spelling doaj-art-446df3f41065409caf2769cbd4cc6d612025-08-20T01:53:57ZengMichigan PublishingErgo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy2330-40142025-04-0112010.3998/ergo.6924Constitution, Non-Causal Explanation, and DemarcationLorenzo CasiniMichael Baumgartner0University of BergenIn philosophy of science, constitutive explanations have attracted much attention since Craver’s influential book Explaining the Brain (2007). His Mutual Manipulability (MM) theory of constitution aimed to explicate constitution as a non-causal explanatory relation and to demarcate between constituents and non-constituents. But MM received decisive criticism. In response, Craver et al. (2021) have recently proposed a new theory, called Matched Interlevel Experiments (MIE), which is currently gaining traction in various fields. The authors claim that MIE retains “the spirit of MM without conceptual confusion.” Our paper argues that this claim is not borne out: neither does MIE meet MM’s objectives nor is it free of conceptual confusion. At the same time, we show that it is possible to meet MM’s objectives in a conceptually sound manner—by adopting the so-called No De-Coupling theory of constitution.https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article/id/6924/
spellingShingle Lorenzo Casini
Michael Baumgartner
Constitution, Non-Causal Explanation, and Demarcation
Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy
title Constitution, Non-Causal Explanation, and Demarcation
title_full Constitution, Non-Causal Explanation, and Demarcation
title_fullStr Constitution, Non-Causal Explanation, and Demarcation
title_full_unstemmed Constitution, Non-Causal Explanation, and Demarcation
title_short Constitution, Non-Causal Explanation, and Demarcation
title_sort constitution non causal explanation and demarcation
url https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article/id/6924/
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzocasini constitutionnoncausalexplanationanddemarcation
AT michaelbaumgartner constitutionnoncausalexplanationanddemarcation