A cross‐sectional study evaluating the frequency of HIV drug resistance mutations among individuals diagnosed with HIV‐1 in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate‐based pre‐exposure prophylaxis rollout programmes in Kenya, Zimbabwe, Eswatini and South Africa

Abstract Introduction The ongoing rollout of oral tenofovir‐based pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to reduce HIV‐1 incidence, but HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) in individuals who acquire HIV‐1 on PrEP could threaten the treatment effectiveness of overlapping antiretrovirals (tenofovir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Urvi M. Parikh, Lauren D. Kudrick, Lisa Levy, Everline Bosek, Bhavna H. Chohan, Irene Mukui, Sarah Masyuko, Nonhlanhla Ndlovu, Imelda Mahaka, Owen Mugurungi, Gertrude Ncube, Anita Hettema, Sindy N. Matse, Saiqa Mullick, Carole L. Wallis, Amy L. Heaps, Kerri J. Penrose, Kevin D. McCormick, Lubbe Wiesner, Peter L. Anderson, Jill M. Peterson, Connie Celum, Barbra A. Richardson, Delivette Castor, Shannon Allen, Kristine Torjesen, John W. Mellors, Global Evaluation of Microbicide Sensitivity (GEMS) Project
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-08-01
Series:Journal of the International AIDS Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.70011
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849223295720751104
author Urvi M. Parikh
Lauren D. Kudrick
Lisa Levy
Everline Bosek
Bhavna H. Chohan
Irene Mukui
Sarah Masyuko
Nonhlanhla Ndlovu
Imelda Mahaka
Owen Mugurungi
Gertrude Ncube
Anita Hettema
Sindy N. Matse
Saiqa Mullick
Carole L. Wallis
Amy L. Heaps
Kerri J. Penrose
Kevin D. McCormick
Lubbe Wiesner
Peter L. Anderson
Jill M. Peterson
Connie Celum
Barbra A. Richardson
Delivette Castor
Shannon Allen
Kristine Torjesen
John W. Mellors
Global Evaluation of Microbicide Sensitivity (GEMS) Project
author_facet Urvi M. Parikh
Lauren D. Kudrick
Lisa Levy
Everline Bosek
Bhavna H. Chohan
Irene Mukui
Sarah Masyuko
Nonhlanhla Ndlovu
Imelda Mahaka
Owen Mugurungi
Gertrude Ncube
Anita Hettema
Sindy N. Matse
Saiqa Mullick
Carole L. Wallis
Amy L. Heaps
Kerri J. Penrose
Kevin D. McCormick
Lubbe Wiesner
Peter L. Anderson
Jill M. Peterson
Connie Celum
Barbra A. Richardson
Delivette Castor
Shannon Allen
Kristine Torjesen
John W. Mellors
Global Evaluation of Microbicide Sensitivity (GEMS) Project
author_sort Urvi M. Parikh
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction The ongoing rollout of oral tenofovir‐based pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to reduce HIV‐1 incidence, but HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) in individuals who acquire HIV‐1 on PrEP could threaten the treatment effectiveness of overlapping antiretrovirals (tenofovir/emtricitabine), contribute to development of resistance, and undermine HIV control efforts. Accordingly, the Global Evaluation of Microbicide Sensitivity (GEMS) project was established to monitor HIVDR in PrEP rollout programmes in Southern and Eastern Africa. Methods GEMS monitored resistance in >100,000 estimated persons who accessed PrEP through national programmes or implementation projects in Southern/Eastern Africa. Participants self‐reported demographics and PrEP adherence. HIV‐1 RNA and tenofovir‐diphosphate levels were measured in blood samples collected at the time of study enrolment from consenting participants diagnosed with HIV who had received PrEP. HIVDR mutations were detected by population genotyping. Results Of 283 reported seroconversions on PrEP from December 2017 through September 2023, 255 (90%) individuals enrolled in GEMS, of which 81 (32%) were from Kenya, 77 (30%) from South Africa, 69 (27%) from Zimbabwe and 28 (11%) from Eswatini. Half (130; 51%) were 15–24 years of age at seroconversion, and three‐quarters (193; 76%) were female. Thirty‐four seroconversions occurred within 30 days of PrEP initiation. Tenofovir‐diphosphate levels were consistent with moderate to high levels (≥350 femtomoles per punch) in 53% (120 of 226) individuals with drug‐level data. Of 154 samples successfully genotyped, 34 (22%; 95% CI [16%, 30%]) had PrEP‐associated mutations; these included 27 samples with M184I/V, one sample with K65KR, and six samples with both K65R and M184I/V. Conclusions The frequency of HIVDR mutations associated with tenofovir or emtricitabine among individuals diagnosed with HIV who had received PrEP (22%) exceeded background levels of transmitted nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance in Southern and Eastern Africa (≤5%) but people with PrEP‐associated mutations are likely to achieve virologic suppression with current first‐line antiretroviral therapy (ART). Improved screening for acute infection before initiating PrEP, surveillance of HIVDR with the introduction of new PrEP programmes and the monitoring of longer‐term ART outcomes in individuals who acquire HIV‐1 on PrEP will be essential to preserve antiretroviral options for both treatment and prevention.
format Article
id doaj-art-445db4e827a042d799d3e912aae3a6d5
institution Kabale University
issn 1758-2652
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the International AIDS Society
spelling doaj-art-445db4e827a042d799d3e912aae3a6d52025-08-25T18:26:38ZengWileyJournal of the International AIDS Society1758-26522025-08-01288n/an/a10.1002/jia2.70011A cross‐sectional study evaluating the frequency of HIV drug resistance mutations among individuals diagnosed with HIV‐1 in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate‐based pre‐exposure prophylaxis rollout programmes in Kenya, Zimbabwe, Eswatini and South AfricaUrvi M. Parikh0Lauren D. Kudrick1Lisa Levy2Everline Bosek3Bhavna H. Chohan4Irene Mukui5Sarah Masyuko6Nonhlanhla Ndlovu7Imelda Mahaka8Owen Mugurungi9Gertrude Ncube10Anita Hettema11Sindy N. Matse12Saiqa Mullick13Carole L. Wallis14Amy L. Heaps15Kerri J. Penrose16Kevin D. McCormick17Lubbe Wiesner18Peter L. Anderson19Jill M. Peterson20Connie Celum21Barbra A. Richardson22Delivette Castor23Shannon Allen24Kristine Torjesen25John W. Mellors26Global Evaluation of Microbicide Sensitivity (GEMS) ProjectUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USAUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USAFHI 360 Durham North Carolina USAUniversity of Washington‐Kenya Nairobi KenyaKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Nairobi KenyaNational AIDS and STI Programme Ministry of Health Nairobi KenyaNational AIDS and STI Programme Ministry of Health Nairobi KenyaPangaea Zimbabwe Harare ZimbabwePangaea Zimbabwe Harare ZimbabweMinistry of Health and Child Care Harare ZimbabweMinistry of Health and Child Care Harare ZimbabweClinton Health Access Initiative Mbabane EswatiniMinistry of Health Mbabane EswatiniWits RHI The University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South AfricaBARC‐SA and Lancet Laboratories Johannesburg South AfricaUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USAUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USAUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USADivision of Clinical Pharmacology Department of Medicine University of Cape Town Cape Town South AfricaUniversity of Colorado‐Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USAFHI 360 Durham North Carolina USADepartments of Global Health Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Washington Seattle Washington USADepartments of Global Health Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Washington Seattle Washington USAColumbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USAUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID) Washington DC USAFHI 360 Durham North Carolina USAUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USAAbstract Introduction The ongoing rollout of oral tenofovir‐based pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to reduce HIV‐1 incidence, but HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) in individuals who acquire HIV‐1 on PrEP could threaten the treatment effectiveness of overlapping antiretrovirals (tenofovir/emtricitabine), contribute to development of resistance, and undermine HIV control efforts. Accordingly, the Global Evaluation of Microbicide Sensitivity (GEMS) project was established to monitor HIVDR in PrEP rollout programmes in Southern and Eastern Africa. Methods GEMS monitored resistance in >100,000 estimated persons who accessed PrEP through national programmes or implementation projects in Southern/Eastern Africa. Participants self‐reported demographics and PrEP adherence. HIV‐1 RNA and tenofovir‐diphosphate levels were measured in blood samples collected at the time of study enrolment from consenting participants diagnosed with HIV who had received PrEP. HIVDR mutations were detected by population genotyping. Results Of 283 reported seroconversions on PrEP from December 2017 through September 2023, 255 (90%) individuals enrolled in GEMS, of which 81 (32%) were from Kenya, 77 (30%) from South Africa, 69 (27%) from Zimbabwe and 28 (11%) from Eswatini. Half (130; 51%) were 15–24 years of age at seroconversion, and three‐quarters (193; 76%) were female. Thirty‐four seroconversions occurred within 30 days of PrEP initiation. Tenofovir‐diphosphate levels were consistent with moderate to high levels (≥350 femtomoles per punch) in 53% (120 of 226) individuals with drug‐level data. Of 154 samples successfully genotyped, 34 (22%; 95% CI [16%, 30%]) had PrEP‐associated mutations; these included 27 samples with M184I/V, one sample with K65KR, and six samples with both K65R and M184I/V. Conclusions The frequency of HIVDR mutations associated with tenofovir or emtricitabine among individuals diagnosed with HIV who had received PrEP (22%) exceeded background levels of transmitted nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance in Southern and Eastern Africa (≤5%) but people with PrEP‐associated mutations are likely to achieve virologic suppression with current first‐line antiretroviral therapy (ART). Improved screening for acute infection before initiating PrEP, surveillance of HIVDR with the introduction of new PrEP programmes and the monitoring of longer‐term ART outcomes in individuals who acquire HIV‐1 on PrEP will be essential to preserve antiretroviral options for both treatment and prevention.https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.70011HIVHIV preventionpre‐exposure prophylaxisdrug resistancetenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabinesub‐Saharan Africa
spellingShingle Urvi M. Parikh
Lauren D. Kudrick
Lisa Levy
Everline Bosek
Bhavna H. Chohan
Irene Mukui
Sarah Masyuko
Nonhlanhla Ndlovu
Imelda Mahaka
Owen Mugurungi
Gertrude Ncube
Anita Hettema
Sindy N. Matse
Saiqa Mullick
Carole L. Wallis
Amy L. Heaps
Kerri J. Penrose
Kevin D. McCormick
Lubbe Wiesner
Peter L. Anderson
Jill M. Peterson
Connie Celum
Barbra A. Richardson
Delivette Castor
Shannon Allen
Kristine Torjesen
John W. Mellors
Global Evaluation of Microbicide Sensitivity (GEMS) Project
A cross‐sectional study evaluating the frequency of HIV drug resistance mutations among individuals diagnosed with HIV‐1 in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate‐based pre‐exposure prophylaxis rollout programmes in Kenya, Zimbabwe, Eswatini and South Africa
Journal of the International AIDS Society
HIV
HIV prevention
pre‐exposure prophylaxis
drug resistance
tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine
sub‐Saharan Africa
title A cross‐sectional study evaluating the frequency of HIV drug resistance mutations among individuals diagnosed with HIV‐1 in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate‐based pre‐exposure prophylaxis rollout programmes in Kenya, Zimbabwe, Eswatini and South Africa
title_full A cross‐sectional study evaluating the frequency of HIV drug resistance mutations among individuals diagnosed with HIV‐1 in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate‐based pre‐exposure prophylaxis rollout programmes in Kenya, Zimbabwe, Eswatini and South Africa
title_fullStr A cross‐sectional study evaluating the frequency of HIV drug resistance mutations among individuals diagnosed with HIV‐1 in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate‐based pre‐exposure prophylaxis rollout programmes in Kenya, Zimbabwe, Eswatini and South Africa
title_full_unstemmed A cross‐sectional study evaluating the frequency of HIV drug resistance mutations among individuals diagnosed with HIV‐1 in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate‐based pre‐exposure prophylaxis rollout programmes in Kenya, Zimbabwe, Eswatini and South Africa
title_short A cross‐sectional study evaluating the frequency of HIV drug resistance mutations among individuals diagnosed with HIV‐1 in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate‐based pre‐exposure prophylaxis rollout programmes in Kenya, Zimbabwe, Eswatini and South Africa
title_sort cross sectional study evaluating the frequency of hiv drug resistance mutations among individuals diagnosed with hiv 1 in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate based pre exposure prophylaxis rollout programmes in kenya zimbabwe eswatini and south africa
topic HIV
HIV prevention
pre‐exposure prophylaxis
drug resistance
tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine
sub‐Saharan Africa
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.70011
work_keys_str_mv AT urvimparikh acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT laurendkudrick acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT lisalevy acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT everlinebosek acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT bhavnahchohan acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT irenemukui acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT sarahmasyuko acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT nonhlanhlandlovu acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT imeldamahaka acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT owenmugurungi acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT gertrudencube acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT anitahettema acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT sindynmatse acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT saiqamullick acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT carolelwallis acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT amylheaps acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT kerrijpenrose acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT kevindmccormick acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT lubbewiesner acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT peterlanderson acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT jillmpeterson acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT conniecelum acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT barbraarichardson acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT delivettecastor acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT shannonallen acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT kristinetorjesen acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT johnwmellors acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT globalevaluationofmicrobicidesensitivitygemsproject acrosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT urvimparikh crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT laurendkudrick crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT lisalevy crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT everlinebosek crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT bhavnahchohan crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT irenemukui crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT sarahmasyuko crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT nonhlanhlandlovu crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT imeldamahaka crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT owenmugurungi crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT gertrudencube crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT anitahettema crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT sindynmatse crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT saiqamullick crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT carolelwallis crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT amylheaps crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT kerrijpenrose crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT kevindmccormick crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT lubbewiesner crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT peterlanderson crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT jillmpeterson crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT conniecelum crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT barbraarichardson crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT delivettecastor crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT shannonallen crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT kristinetorjesen crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT johnwmellors crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica
AT globalevaluationofmicrobicidesensitivitygemsproject crosssectionalstudyevaluatingthefrequencyofhivdrugresistancemutationsamongindividualsdiagnosedwithhiv1intenofovirdisoproxilfumaratebasedpreexposureprophylaxisrolloutprogrammesinkenyazimbabweeswatiniandsouthafrica