« (Ainsi parlent les araignées) » : Les prosopopées sans anthropocentrisme de l’histoire naturelle romantique

This paper focuses on the use of prosopopeia in naturalistic writing by questioning, from the perspective of contemporary animalistic philosophy, the values that can be associated with this form of anthropomorphism. Starting from the example of Michelet, it reveals a paradox that is constitutive of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Élisabeth Plas
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Pléiade (EA 7338) 2020-12-01
Series:Itinéraires
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/itineraires/8718
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850150360035885056
author Élisabeth Plas
author_facet Élisabeth Plas
author_sort Élisabeth Plas
collection DOAJ
description This paper focuses on the use of prosopopeia in naturalistic writing by questioning, from the perspective of contemporary animalistic philosophy, the values that can be associated with this form of anthropomorphism. Starting from the example of Michelet, it reveals a paradox that is constitutive of Romantic natural history, whose concern for the animal finds expression in ancient discursive forms that seem to deny the singularity and the very animality of animals. By comparing rhetoric with Michelet’s thought, this paper shows that at a time in literary and scientific history, anthropomorphism has paradoxically been the stylistic expression of a continuist and even animist philosophy.
format Article
id doaj-art-44543136cd4e40768a707ebc1bca2348
institution OA Journals
issn 2427-920X
language fra
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Pléiade (EA 7338)
record_format Article
series Itinéraires
spelling doaj-art-44543136cd4e40768a707ebc1bca23482025-08-20T02:26:35ZfraPléiade (EA 7338)Itinéraires2427-920X2020-12-012020210.4000/itineraires.8718« (Ainsi parlent les araignées) » : Les prosopopées sans anthropocentrisme de l’histoire naturelle romantiqueÉlisabeth PlasThis paper focuses on the use of prosopopeia in naturalistic writing by questioning, from the perspective of contemporary animalistic philosophy, the values that can be associated with this form of anthropomorphism. Starting from the example of Michelet, it reveals a paradox that is constitutive of Romantic natural history, whose concern for the animal finds expression in ancient discursive forms that seem to deny the singularity and the very animality of animals. By comparing rhetoric with Michelet’s thought, this paper shows that at a time in literary and scientific history, anthropomorphism has paradoxically been the stylistic expression of a continuist and even animist philosophy.https://journals.openedition.org/itineraires/8718romanticismanthropomorphismnatural historyprosopopeiaMichelet (Jules)
spellingShingle Élisabeth Plas
« (Ainsi parlent les araignées) » : Les prosopopées sans anthropocentrisme de l’histoire naturelle romantique
Itinéraires
romanticism
anthropomorphism
natural history
prosopopeia
Michelet (Jules)
title « (Ainsi parlent les araignées) » : Les prosopopées sans anthropocentrisme de l’histoire naturelle romantique
title_full « (Ainsi parlent les araignées) » : Les prosopopées sans anthropocentrisme de l’histoire naturelle romantique
title_fullStr « (Ainsi parlent les araignées) » : Les prosopopées sans anthropocentrisme de l’histoire naturelle romantique
title_full_unstemmed « (Ainsi parlent les araignées) » : Les prosopopées sans anthropocentrisme de l’histoire naturelle romantique
title_short « (Ainsi parlent les araignées) » : Les prosopopées sans anthropocentrisme de l’histoire naturelle romantique
title_sort ainsi parlent les araignees les prosopopees sans anthropocentrisme de l histoire naturelle romantique
topic romanticism
anthropomorphism
natural history
prosopopeia
Michelet (Jules)
url https://journals.openedition.org/itineraires/8718
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabethplas ainsiparlentlesaraigneeslesprosopopeessansanthropocentrismedelhistoirenaturelleromantique