The <i>That</i>-Trace Effect—A Surface or a Deep Island Phenomenon? Evidence from Resumption and Prolepsis in Igbo

In many languages, a subject/non-subject Ā-extraction asymmetry can be observed: While non-subject extraction is unproblematic, long extraction of the subject requires repair strategies. This phenomenon is known as the <i>that</i>-trace effect. Two broad types of approaches to this effec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mary Amaechi, Doreen Georgi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-10-01
Series:Languages
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/10/324
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850206207400214528
author Mary Amaechi
Doreen Georgi
author_facet Mary Amaechi
Doreen Georgi
author_sort Mary Amaechi
collection DOAJ
description In many languages, a subject/non-subject Ā-extraction asymmetry can be observed: While non-subject extraction is unproblematic, long extraction of the subject requires repair strategies. This phenomenon is known as the <i>that</i>-trace effect. Two broad types of approaches to this effect have been proposed in the literature: (a) structural accounts that prohibit subject extraction in the syntax; (b) surface-oriented PF accounts according to which nothing blocks long subject movement in the syntax, but a surface filter prohibits the output string where a trace follows the complementizer. In this paper, we argue for a syntactic cause of the effect in Igbo (Benue-Congo, Nigeria). The empirical evidence centers around the distribution of resumptive pronouns in the language. We show that Igbo has all the ingredients required for a PF approach to the <i>that</i>-trace effect (viz., long Ā-movement and trace spell-out); nevertheless, it does not apply them to enable long subject extraction but rather resorts to prolepsis (among other strategies). Further evidence against a PF account comes from the impossibility of short subject extraction. Finally, we provide evidence from subextraction from subjects for an antilocality component underlying the subject extraction restriction in Igbo.
format Article
id doaj-art-444da50f60d74e88b97e07a559fbd0c6
institution OA Journals
issn 2226-471X
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Languages
spelling doaj-art-444da50f60d74e88b97e07a559fbd0c62025-08-20T02:10:54ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2024-10-0191032410.3390/languages9100324The <i>That</i>-Trace Effect—A Surface or a Deep Island Phenomenon? Evidence from Resumption and Prolepsis in IgboMary Amaechi0Doreen Georgi1Department of Linguistics and Nigerian Languages, University of Ilorin, P.M.B. 1515 Ilorin, NigeriaDepartment of Linguistics, Universität Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, GermanyIn many languages, a subject/non-subject Ā-extraction asymmetry can be observed: While non-subject extraction is unproblematic, long extraction of the subject requires repair strategies. This phenomenon is known as the <i>that</i>-trace effect. Two broad types of approaches to this effect have been proposed in the literature: (a) structural accounts that prohibit subject extraction in the syntax; (b) surface-oriented PF accounts according to which nothing blocks long subject movement in the syntax, but a surface filter prohibits the output string where a trace follows the complementizer. In this paper, we argue for a syntactic cause of the effect in Igbo (Benue-Congo, Nigeria). The empirical evidence centers around the distribution of resumptive pronouns in the language. We show that Igbo has all the ingredients required for a PF approach to the <i>that</i>-trace effect (viz., long Ā-movement and trace spell-out); nevertheless, it does not apply them to enable long subject extraction but rather resorts to prolepsis (among other strategies). Further evidence against a PF account comes from the impossibility of short subject extraction. Finally, we provide evidence from subextraction from subjects for an antilocality component underlying the subject extraction restriction in Igbo.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/10/324<i>that</i>-trace effectresumptionprolepsisanti-localityreflexes of movementIgbo
spellingShingle Mary Amaechi
Doreen Georgi
The <i>That</i>-Trace Effect—A Surface or a Deep Island Phenomenon? Evidence from Resumption and Prolepsis in Igbo
Languages
<i>that</i>-trace effect
resumption
prolepsis
anti-locality
reflexes of movement
Igbo
title The <i>That</i>-Trace Effect—A Surface or a Deep Island Phenomenon? Evidence from Resumption and Prolepsis in Igbo
title_full The <i>That</i>-Trace Effect—A Surface or a Deep Island Phenomenon? Evidence from Resumption and Prolepsis in Igbo
title_fullStr The <i>That</i>-Trace Effect—A Surface or a Deep Island Phenomenon? Evidence from Resumption and Prolepsis in Igbo
title_full_unstemmed The <i>That</i>-Trace Effect—A Surface or a Deep Island Phenomenon? Evidence from Resumption and Prolepsis in Igbo
title_short The <i>That</i>-Trace Effect—A Surface or a Deep Island Phenomenon? Evidence from Resumption and Prolepsis in Igbo
title_sort i that i trace effect a surface or a deep island phenomenon evidence from resumption and prolepsis in igbo
topic <i>that</i>-trace effect
resumption
prolepsis
anti-locality
reflexes of movement
Igbo
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/10/324
work_keys_str_mv AT maryamaechi theithatitraceeffectasurfaceoradeepislandphenomenonevidencefromresumptionandprolepsisinigbo
AT doreengeorgi theithatitraceeffectasurfaceoradeepislandphenomenonevidencefromresumptionandprolepsisinigbo
AT maryamaechi ithatitraceeffectasurfaceoradeepislandphenomenonevidencefromresumptionandprolepsisinigbo
AT doreengeorgi ithatitraceeffectasurfaceoradeepislandphenomenonevidencefromresumptionandprolepsisinigbo