Methods for Mesh Implantation Efficacy Assessment in Rectocele
Aim. A methodological review on mesh implantation efficacy assessment in surgery for rectocele.Key points. Specialised quiz surveys are among the most appropriate methods to assess surgical intervention efficacy. The questionnaires that enable pre- and postsurgery rectocele grading include PFDI-20 (...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Gastro LLC
2021-10-01
|
| Series: | Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/599 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823860124171632640 |
|---|---|
| author | A. S. Lukianov A. Yu. Titov O. M. Biryukov A. A. Mudrov I. V. Kostarev |
| author_facet | A. S. Lukianov A. Yu. Titov O. M. Biryukov A. A. Mudrov I. V. Kostarev |
| author_sort | A. S. Lukianov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim. A methodological review on mesh implantation efficacy assessment in surgery for rectocele.Key points. Specialised quiz surveys are among the most appropriate methods to assess surgical intervention efficacy. The questionnaires that enable pre- and postsurgery rectocele grading include PFDI-20 (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory), the colonic evacuation disorder scale and Cleveland Constipation Scoring System. These surveys determine the surgical intervention efficacy dynamically in conjunction with instrumental surgery assessment techniques.Conclusion. Clinical practice at the Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology combines the originally developed colonic evacuation disorder scale (2003) and PFDI-20. The combined scales allow for a comprehensive symptom assessment in patients with rectocele and other descending perineum syndrome manifestations prior to surgery, as well as symptom dynamics evaluation postoperatively, which, in link with defecography, enables a complete appraisal of the surgical effect. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4448d0adcc884b7eb956172c69687e0c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1382-4376 2658-6673 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
| publisher | Gastro LLC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии |
| spelling | doaj-art-4448d0adcc884b7eb956172c69687e0c2025-02-10T16:14:36ZrusGastro LLCРоссийский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии1382-43762658-66732021-10-01313172510.22416/1382-4376-2021-31-3-17-25431Methods for Mesh Implantation Efficacy Assessment in RectoceleA. S. Lukianov0A. Yu. Titov1O. M. Biryukov2A. A. Mudrov3I. V. Kostarev4Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for ColoproctologyRyzhikh National Medical Research Centre for ColoproctologyRyzhikh National Medical Research Centre for ColoproctologyRyzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of RussiaRyzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of RussiaAim. A methodological review on mesh implantation efficacy assessment in surgery for rectocele.Key points. Specialised quiz surveys are among the most appropriate methods to assess surgical intervention efficacy. The questionnaires that enable pre- and postsurgery rectocele grading include PFDI-20 (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory), the colonic evacuation disorder scale and Cleveland Constipation Scoring System. These surveys determine the surgical intervention efficacy dynamically in conjunction with instrumental surgery assessment techniques.Conclusion. Clinical practice at the Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology combines the originally developed colonic evacuation disorder scale (2003) and PFDI-20. The combined scales allow for a comprehensive symptom assessment in patients with rectocele and other descending perineum syndrome manifestations prior to surgery, as well as symptom dynamics evaluation postoperatively, which, in link with defecography, enables a complete appraisal of the surgical effect.https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/599rectocelemesh implantpelvic prolapsedefecographyquestionnaire conflict of interest: the authors declare no conflict of interest |
| spellingShingle | A. S. Lukianov A. Yu. Titov O. M. Biryukov A. A. Mudrov I. V. Kostarev Methods for Mesh Implantation Efficacy Assessment in Rectocele Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии rectocele mesh implant pelvic prolapse defecography questionnaire conflict of interest: the authors declare no conflict of interest |
| title | Methods for Mesh Implantation Efficacy Assessment in Rectocele |
| title_full | Methods for Mesh Implantation Efficacy Assessment in Rectocele |
| title_fullStr | Methods for Mesh Implantation Efficacy Assessment in Rectocele |
| title_full_unstemmed | Methods for Mesh Implantation Efficacy Assessment in Rectocele |
| title_short | Methods for Mesh Implantation Efficacy Assessment in Rectocele |
| title_sort | methods for mesh implantation efficacy assessment in rectocele |
| topic | rectocele mesh implant pelvic prolapse defecography questionnaire conflict of interest: the authors declare no conflict of interest |
| url | https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/599 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aslukianov methodsformeshimplantationefficacyassessmentinrectocele AT ayutitov methodsformeshimplantationefficacyassessmentinrectocele AT ombiryukov methodsformeshimplantationefficacyassessmentinrectocele AT aamudrov methodsformeshimplantationefficacyassessmentinrectocele AT ivkostarev methodsformeshimplantationefficacyassessmentinrectocele |