The responsiveness of surgical research to Māori in Aotearoa, New Zealand—a scoping reviewResearch in context

Summary: Background: Māori, the Indigenous people of Aotearoa, New Zealand (NZ), experience significant inequities in access to surgery and postoperative outcomes. This scoping review aimed to present a synopsis of the extent and nature of research concerning Māori in surgery in NZ and evaluated th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jamie-Lee Rahiri, Noah Appleby, Makayla Kahi, Annaliese Wheeler, Jason Tuhoe, Shanthi Ameratunga, Rachelle Love, Wiremu MacFater, Matire Harwood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:The Lancet Regional Health. Western Pacific
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606525000240
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823859389439672320
author Jamie-Lee Rahiri
Noah Appleby
Makayla Kahi
Annaliese Wheeler
Jason Tuhoe
Shanthi Ameratunga
Rachelle Love
Wiremu MacFater
Matire Harwood
author_facet Jamie-Lee Rahiri
Noah Appleby
Makayla Kahi
Annaliese Wheeler
Jason Tuhoe
Shanthi Ameratunga
Rachelle Love
Wiremu MacFater
Matire Harwood
author_sort Jamie-Lee Rahiri
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Background: Māori, the Indigenous people of Aotearoa, New Zealand (NZ), experience significant inequities in access to surgery and postoperative outcomes. This scoping review aimed to present a synopsis of the extent and nature of research concerning Māori in surgery in NZ and evaluated the responsiveness of this evidence base to Māori using two Indigenous frameworks. Methods: Utilising a Kaupapa Māori methodological stance, a scoping review of all studies related to Māori and surgical care in NZ (2000–2024) was performed. The studies underwent thorough evaluation using the CONSIDER and MĀORI frameworks to assess responsiveness to Indigenous Māori. Findings: A total of 254 studies were included, most being quantitative (N = 230, 91%) and most categorised under General Surgery (N = 139, 55%). Māori responsiveness assessments of each study highlighted significant shortcomings, with 96% of studies (N = 243/254) rated as low quality as per the adapted CONSIDER framework and 68% (N = 172/254) rated as low quality in accordance with the MĀORI framework. More than half of all studies (55%) did not report Māori leadership, governance, and co-authorship. Studies that utilised Kaupapa Māori research were more likely to be considered high-quality. Interpretation: This study shows that the current surgical evidence base is not responsive to Māori. It calls for a review of research practices and encourages monitoring of the surgical evidence base for all Indigenous peoples. Funding: This study was supported by a Health Research Council of New Zealand Health Delivery Research Activation Grant (21/860) and Māori Health Knowledge Translation Grant (25/234). The funders had no role in the study design, conception, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or report writing. They also had no role in submitting our study for publication.
format Article
id doaj-art-442661caf23749e5ad4c4c6207340299
institution Kabale University
issn 2666-6065
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series The Lancet Regional Health. Western Pacific
spelling doaj-art-442661caf23749e5ad4c4c62073402992025-02-11T04:35:31ZengElsevierThe Lancet Regional Health. Western Pacific2666-60652025-02-0155101487The responsiveness of surgical research to Māori in Aotearoa, New Zealand—a scoping reviewResearch in contextJamie-Lee Rahiri0Noah Appleby1Makayla Kahi2Annaliese Wheeler3Jason Tuhoe4Shanthi Ameratunga5Rachelle Love6Wiremu MacFater7Matire Harwood8Te Piringa Kōtuku, Tuhauora Medical Associates, 75 Shortland Rd, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand; Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand; Corresponding author. Te Piringa Kōtuku, Tuhauora Medical Associates, 75 Shortland Road, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.Medical Students, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1010, New ZealandMedical Students, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1010, New ZealandDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1010, New ZealandDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1010, New ZealandSection of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New ZealandDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Christchurch Hospital, Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch Central City, Christchurch, 4710, New ZealandBoard Member, Te Ohu Rata o Aotearoa – Māori Medical Practitioners Association, New ZealandDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1010, New ZealandSummary: Background: Māori, the Indigenous people of Aotearoa, New Zealand (NZ), experience significant inequities in access to surgery and postoperative outcomes. This scoping review aimed to present a synopsis of the extent and nature of research concerning Māori in surgery in NZ and evaluated the responsiveness of this evidence base to Māori using two Indigenous frameworks. Methods: Utilising a Kaupapa Māori methodological stance, a scoping review of all studies related to Māori and surgical care in NZ (2000–2024) was performed. The studies underwent thorough evaluation using the CONSIDER and MĀORI frameworks to assess responsiveness to Indigenous Māori. Findings: A total of 254 studies were included, most being quantitative (N = 230, 91%) and most categorised under General Surgery (N = 139, 55%). Māori responsiveness assessments of each study highlighted significant shortcomings, with 96% of studies (N = 243/254) rated as low quality as per the adapted CONSIDER framework and 68% (N = 172/254) rated as low quality in accordance with the MĀORI framework. More than half of all studies (55%) did not report Māori leadership, governance, and co-authorship. Studies that utilised Kaupapa Māori research were more likely to be considered high-quality. Interpretation: This study shows that the current surgical evidence base is not responsive to Māori. It calls for a review of research practices and encourages monitoring of the surgical evidence base for all Indigenous peoples. Funding: This study was supported by a Health Research Council of New Zealand Health Delivery Research Activation Grant (21/860) and Māori Health Knowledge Translation Grant (25/234). The funders had no role in the study design, conception, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or report writing. They also had no role in submitting our study for publication.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606525000240Māori healthSurgeryEquityAotearoa New Zealand
spellingShingle Jamie-Lee Rahiri
Noah Appleby
Makayla Kahi
Annaliese Wheeler
Jason Tuhoe
Shanthi Ameratunga
Rachelle Love
Wiremu MacFater
Matire Harwood
The responsiveness of surgical research to Māori in Aotearoa, New Zealand—a scoping reviewResearch in context
The Lancet Regional Health. Western Pacific
Māori health
Surgery
Equity
Aotearoa New Zealand
title The responsiveness of surgical research to Māori in Aotearoa, New Zealand—a scoping reviewResearch in context
title_full The responsiveness of surgical research to Māori in Aotearoa, New Zealand—a scoping reviewResearch in context
title_fullStr The responsiveness of surgical research to Māori in Aotearoa, New Zealand—a scoping reviewResearch in context
title_full_unstemmed The responsiveness of surgical research to Māori in Aotearoa, New Zealand—a scoping reviewResearch in context
title_short The responsiveness of surgical research to Māori in Aotearoa, New Zealand—a scoping reviewResearch in context
title_sort responsiveness of surgical research to maori in aotearoa new zealand a scoping reviewresearch in context
topic Māori health
Surgery
Equity
Aotearoa New Zealand
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606525000240
work_keys_str_mv AT jamieleerahiri theresponsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT noahappleby theresponsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT makaylakahi theresponsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT annaliesewheeler theresponsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT jasontuhoe theresponsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT shanthiameratunga theresponsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT rachellelove theresponsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT wiremumacfater theresponsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT matireharwood theresponsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT jamieleerahiri responsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT noahappleby responsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT makaylakahi responsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT annaliesewheeler responsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT jasontuhoe responsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT shanthiameratunga responsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT rachellelove responsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT wiremumacfater responsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext
AT matireharwood responsivenessofsurgicalresearchtomaoriinaotearoanewzealandascopingreviewresearchincontext