How to Run Linear Mixed Effects Analysis for Pairwise Comparisons? A Tutorial and a Proposal for the Calculation of Standardized Effect Sizes
This tutorial provides guidelines for conducting linear mixed effects (LME) analyses for simple designs, aimed at researchers familiar with t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression. First, we compare LME analyses with traditional methods when participants are the only source of ra...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Cognition |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://account.journalofcognition.org/index.php/up-j-jc/article/view/409 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823859313915985920 |
|---|---|
| author | Marc Brysbaert Dries Debeer |
| author_facet | Marc Brysbaert Dries Debeer |
| author_sort | Marc Brysbaert |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This tutorial provides guidelines for conducting linear mixed effects (LME) analyses for simple designs, aimed at researchers familiar with t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression. First, we compare LME analyses with traditional methods when participants are the only source of random variation. We show that LME analysis is more interesting as soon as you have more than one observation per participant per condition. The second section discusses studies where both participants and stimuli are used as sources of random variation, ensuring robust generalization beyond the specific stimuli tested. In our search for standardized effect sizes, we saw that partial eta squared is even less informative for LME than for ANOVA. We present eta squared within as an alternative, to be used in combination with the traditional measure eta squared (also in ANOVA). To facilitate implementation, we analyze toy datasets with R and jamovi. This tutorial gives researchers a good foundation for LME analyses of simple 2 × 2 designs and paves the way for tackling more complicated designs. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-43fdb8c0cfc2492895b2f72d8660d93d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2514-4820 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Ubiquity Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Cognition |
| spelling | doaj-art-43fdb8c0cfc2492895b2f72d8660d93d2025-02-11T05:36:32ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202025-01-01815510.5334/joc.409408How to Run Linear Mixed Effects Analysis for Pairwise Comparisons? A Tutorial and a Proposal for the Calculation of Standardized Effect SizesMarc Brysbaert0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3645-3189Dries Debeer1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-357XFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent UniversityFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent UniversityThis tutorial provides guidelines for conducting linear mixed effects (LME) analyses for simple designs, aimed at researchers familiar with t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression. First, we compare LME analyses with traditional methods when participants are the only source of random variation. We show that LME analysis is more interesting as soon as you have more than one observation per participant per condition. The second section discusses studies where both participants and stimuli are used as sources of random variation, ensuring robust generalization beyond the specific stimuli tested. In our search for standardized effect sizes, we saw that partial eta squared is even less informative for LME than for ANOVA. We present eta squared within as an alternative, to be used in combination with the traditional measure eta squared (also in ANOVA). To facilitate implementation, we analyze toy datasets with R and jamovi. This tutorial gives researchers a good foundation for LME analyses of simple 2 × 2 designs and paves the way for tackling more complicated designs.https://account.journalofcognition.org/index.php/up-j-jc/article/view/409statistical analysismathematical modellingface perception |
| spellingShingle | Marc Brysbaert Dries Debeer How to Run Linear Mixed Effects Analysis for Pairwise Comparisons? A Tutorial and a Proposal for the Calculation of Standardized Effect Sizes Journal of Cognition statistical analysis mathematical modelling face perception |
| title | How to Run Linear Mixed Effects Analysis for Pairwise Comparisons? A Tutorial and a Proposal for the Calculation of Standardized Effect Sizes |
| title_full | How to Run Linear Mixed Effects Analysis for Pairwise Comparisons? A Tutorial and a Proposal for the Calculation of Standardized Effect Sizes |
| title_fullStr | How to Run Linear Mixed Effects Analysis for Pairwise Comparisons? A Tutorial and a Proposal for the Calculation of Standardized Effect Sizes |
| title_full_unstemmed | How to Run Linear Mixed Effects Analysis for Pairwise Comparisons? A Tutorial and a Proposal for the Calculation of Standardized Effect Sizes |
| title_short | How to Run Linear Mixed Effects Analysis for Pairwise Comparisons? A Tutorial and a Proposal for the Calculation of Standardized Effect Sizes |
| title_sort | how to run linear mixed effects analysis for pairwise comparisons a tutorial and a proposal for the calculation of standardized effect sizes |
| topic | statistical analysis mathematical modelling face perception |
| url | https://account.journalofcognition.org/index.php/up-j-jc/article/view/409 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marcbrysbaert howtorunlinearmixedeffectsanalysisforpairwisecomparisonsatutorialandaproposalforthecalculationofstandardizedeffectsizes AT driesdebeer howtorunlinearmixedeffectsanalysisforpairwisecomparisonsatutorialandaproposalforthecalculationofstandardizedeffectsizes |