Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.
<h4>Introduction</h4>Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students' knowledg...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273693&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849423440801431552 |
|---|---|
| author | Jinhui Ni Pei Wu Xinlin Huang Fangfang Zhang Ze You Qiaoling Chang Li Liao |
| author_facet | Jinhui Ni Pei Wu Xinlin Huang Fangfang Zhang Ze You Qiaoling Chang Li Liao |
| author_sort | Jinhui Ni |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Introduction</h4>Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students' knowledge, skill scores, learning satisfaction, and patients' satisfaction.<h4>Methods</h4>We will conduct searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), China Biological literature database (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ) up to April 2022. Relevant randomized controlled trials meeting the eligibility criteria will be included. And the study selection and data extraction will be independently screened for eligibility by two authors. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted using Rev Man, Stata, and R software. Statistical analyses including homogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis, transitivity tests, consistency tests, and publication bias will be completed.<h4>Ethics and dissemination</h4>No formal research ethics approval is required. The results will be disseminated to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.<h4>Protocol registration number</h4>INPLASY2021120040. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-43f88e8e3b574d968de427202020d9f1 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-43f88e8e3b574d968de427202020d9f12025-08-20T03:30:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01178e027369310.1371/journal.pone.0273693Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.Jinhui NiPei WuXinlin HuangFangfang ZhangZe YouQiaoling ChangLi Liao<h4>Introduction</h4>Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students' knowledge, skill scores, learning satisfaction, and patients' satisfaction.<h4>Methods</h4>We will conduct searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), China Biological literature database (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ) up to April 2022. Relevant randomized controlled trials meeting the eligibility criteria will be included. And the study selection and data extraction will be independently screened for eligibility by two authors. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted using Rev Man, Stata, and R software. Statistical analyses including homogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis, transitivity tests, consistency tests, and publication bias will be completed.<h4>Ethics and dissemination</h4>No formal research ethics approval is required. The results will be disseminated to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.<h4>Protocol registration number</h4>INPLASY2021120040.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273693&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Jinhui Ni Pei Wu Xinlin Huang Fangfang Zhang Ze You Qiaoling Chang Li Liao Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE |
| title | Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
| title_full | Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
| title_fullStr | Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
| title_short | Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
| title_sort | effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching a protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273693&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jinhuini effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT peiwu effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xinlinhuang effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT fangfangzhang effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zeyou effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT qiaolingchang effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT liliao effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |