Cadaveric Biomechanical Comparison of Prepectoral and Submuscular Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Summary:. Decreased postoperative pain and functional impact have been associated with prepectoral breast implant placement versus submuscular placement; yet no mechanical analyses have quantified this difference. Using 1 postmortem human subject, a 3-dimensional biomechanical tracking system was us...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristen L. Stephens, MD, Jared M. Liston, MD, Parker R. Berthelson, MS, Jason L. Kerrigan, PhD, Matthew B. Panzer, PhD, Chris A. Campbell, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2025-04-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006742
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850174549998436352
author Kristen L. Stephens, MD
Jared M. Liston, MD
Parker R. Berthelson, MS
Jason L. Kerrigan, PhD
Matthew B. Panzer, PhD
Chris A. Campbell, MD
author_facet Kristen L. Stephens, MD
Jared M. Liston, MD
Parker R. Berthelson, MS
Jason L. Kerrigan, PhD
Matthew B. Panzer, PhD
Chris A. Campbell, MD
author_sort Kristen L. Stephens, MD
collection DOAJ
description Summary:. Decreased postoperative pain and functional impact have been associated with prepectoral breast implant placement versus submuscular placement; yet no mechanical analyses have quantified this difference. Using 1 postmortem human subject, a 3-dimensional biomechanical tracking system was used to determine the impact of pocket placement on shoulder girdle dynamics for submuscular acellular dermal matrix (ADM)–assisted and prepectoral implants. Smooth silicone breast implants were placed bilaterally—one in the prepectoral plane with anterior ADM coverage and the other in the submuscular ADM-assisted plane. Using tracking nodes at the sternum, clavicles, scapulae, and humeri, each shoulder was tested through serial standardized trials of extension, flexion, lateral extension/flexion, oblique extension/flexion, and abduction using manual manipulations of the shoulder and a counter-weight apparatus before and after implant placement. Bone kinematics (bony displacement and rotation) and kinetics (joint force and moment) were recorded. To achieve equal shoulder extension and flexion maneuvers, submuscular placement was associated with increased scapular, humeral, and clavicular displacement as well as increased scapular and humeral rotation compared with preoperative measurements, whereas prepectoral placement showed no difference. Increased scapular and clavicular rotation with extension and decreased rotation with abduction were noted with both pockets. This cadaveric biomechanical model shows that submuscular implant placement is associated with compensatory increases in bony displacements and rotation required to complete standardized movements consistent with activities of daily living. Further replication of this protocol with varying cadaveric body types and implant sizes would generate predicted postoperative shoulder movement models for implant-based breast reconstruction in different pocket locations.
format Article
id doaj-art-43ef9058253d442caba4a1a6267dde8a
institution OA Journals
issn 2169-7574
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
spelling doaj-art-43ef9058253d442caba4a1a6267dde8a2025-08-20T02:19:38ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742025-04-01134e674210.1097/GOX.0000000000006742202504000-00068Cadaveric Biomechanical Comparison of Prepectoral and Submuscular Implant-based Breast ReconstructionKristen L. Stephens, MD0Jared M. Liston, MD1Parker R. Berthelson, MS2Jason L. Kerrigan, PhD3Matthew B. Panzer, PhD4Chris A. Campbell, MD5From the * Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VAFrom the * Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA† Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.† Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.† Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.From the * Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VASummary:. Decreased postoperative pain and functional impact have been associated with prepectoral breast implant placement versus submuscular placement; yet no mechanical analyses have quantified this difference. Using 1 postmortem human subject, a 3-dimensional biomechanical tracking system was used to determine the impact of pocket placement on shoulder girdle dynamics for submuscular acellular dermal matrix (ADM)–assisted and prepectoral implants. Smooth silicone breast implants were placed bilaterally—one in the prepectoral plane with anterior ADM coverage and the other in the submuscular ADM-assisted plane. Using tracking nodes at the sternum, clavicles, scapulae, and humeri, each shoulder was tested through serial standardized trials of extension, flexion, lateral extension/flexion, oblique extension/flexion, and abduction using manual manipulations of the shoulder and a counter-weight apparatus before and after implant placement. Bone kinematics (bony displacement and rotation) and kinetics (joint force and moment) were recorded. To achieve equal shoulder extension and flexion maneuvers, submuscular placement was associated with increased scapular, humeral, and clavicular displacement as well as increased scapular and humeral rotation compared with preoperative measurements, whereas prepectoral placement showed no difference. Increased scapular and clavicular rotation with extension and decreased rotation with abduction were noted with both pockets. This cadaveric biomechanical model shows that submuscular implant placement is associated with compensatory increases in bony displacements and rotation required to complete standardized movements consistent with activities of daily living. Further replication of this protocol with varying cadaveric body types and implant sizes would generate predicted postoperative shoulder movement models for implant-based breast reconstruction in different pocket locations.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006742
spellingShingle Kristen L. Stephens, MD
Jared M. Liston, MD
Parker R. Berthelson, MS
Jason L. Kerrigan, PhD
Matthew B. Panzer, PhD
Chris A. Campbell, MD
Cadaveric Biomechanical Comparison of Prepectoral and Submuscular Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
title Cadaveric Biomechanical Comparison of Prepectoral and Submuscular Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
title_full Cadaveric Biomechanical Comparison of Prepectoral and Submuscular Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Cadaveric Biomechanical Comparison of Prepectoral and Submuscular Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Cadaveric Biomechanical Comparison of Prepectoral and Submuscular Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
title_short Cadaveric Biomechanical Comparison of Prepectoral and Submuscular Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
title_sort cadaveric biomechanical comparison of prepectoral and submuscular implant based breast reconstruction
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006742
work_keys_str_mv AT kristenlstephensmd cadavericbiomechanicalcomparisonofprepectoralandsubmuscularimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT jaredmlistonmd cadavericbiomechanicalcomparisonofprepectoralandsubmuscularimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT parkerrberthelsonms cadavericbiomechanicalcomparisonofprepectoralandsubmuscularimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT jasonlkerriganphd cadavericbiomechanicalcomparisonofprepectoralandsubmuscularimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT matthewbpanzerphd cadavericbiomechanicalcomparisonofprepectoralandsubmuscularimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT chrisacampbellmd cadavericbiomechanicalcomparisonofprepectoralandsubmuscularimplantbasedbreastreconstruction