LERCANIDIPINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION

Aim: To search the literature assessing lercanidipine effectiveness, tolerability, and benefits in arterial hypertension (AH) treatment. Data sources: The literature search was performed using MEDLINE (1966 – September 2006), EMBASE Drugs and Pharmacology (1980 – September 2006), and Current Content...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Beckey, A. Lundy, N. Lutfi
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC 2009-08-01
Series:Российский кардиологический журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1375
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849688578247884800
author C. Beckey
A. Lundy
N. Lutfi
author_facet C. Beckey
A. Lundy
N. Lutfi
author_sort C. Beckey
collection DOAJ
description Aim: To search the literature assessing lercanidipine effectiveness, tolerability, and benefits in arterial hypertension (AH) treatment. Data sources: The literature search was performed using MEDLINE (1966 – September 2006), EMBASE Drugs and Pharmacology (1980 – September 2006), and Current Contents/Clinical medicine (Week 24, 2005 – Week 30, 2006). Medication instructions were also studied for lercanidipine, nifedipine, and amlodipine, to compare adverse event information. Study and data selection: The English-language papers presenting clinical trials, abstracts, and literature reviews were included. Data synthesis: Lercanidipine is a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist (CA), used for AH treatment. Although the medication is not available in USA, it is widely used in other countries. In two randomised controlled studies, including 400 patients with mild to moderate AH, lercanidipine effectiveness was similar to that in two other dihydropyridine CA – felodipine and slow-release nifedipine, as demonstrated by a significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) levels after four weeks. In a longer study (12 months), lercanidipine (10 mg/d) normalised BP in 49% of the patients as soon as after 4 weeks of the therapy. A post-marketing study, including 9500 patients, confirmed the previous results: in 64%, DBP level reached 90 mm Hg or lower, and in 32%, BP was controlled (<140/90 mm Hg). In elderly patients, lercanidipine, similar to lacidipine and nifedipine, demonstrated a decrease in DBP comparable to that for nifedipine (-18,3 and -17,7 mm Hg, respectively). In contrast to the other dihydropyridine CA, lercanidipine is characterized by lower rates of adverse effects (lower leg edema, in particular). One study showed that fewer participants stopped their treatment due to adverse effects in the lercanidipine (0,9%) and nifedipine (3,8%) groups than in the felodipine group (4,5%). Lercanidipine also demonstrated antihypertensive activity similar to that in other antihypertensive medications, such as atenolol, captopril, and losartan. Conclusions: Lercanidipine could be used as a first-choice medication for AH treatment, since the available literature data confirm its comparative effectiveness and better tolerability, comparing to other antihypertensive agents. Further randomised double-blind clinical trials should be performed to clarify the place of lercanidipine among other medications for AH treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-43a592b0cd3c4cd093871d609df9d36e
institution DOAJ
issn 1560-4071
2618-7620
language Russian
publishDate 2009-08-01
publisher «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC
record_format Article
series Российский кардиологический журнал
spelling doaj-art-43a592b0cd3c4cd093871d609df9d36e2025-08-20T03:21:55Zrus«FIRMA «SILICEA» LLCРоссийский кардиологический журнал1560-40712618-76202009-08-010485931164LERCANIDIPINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSIONC. Beckey0A. Lundy1N. Lutfi2College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, USACollege of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, USACollege of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, USAAim: To search the literature assessing lercanidipine effectiveness, tolerability, and benefits in arterial hypertension (AH) treatment. Data sources: The literature search was performed using MEDLINE (1966 – September 2006), EMBASE Drugs and Pharmacology (1980 – September 2006), and Current Contents/Clinical medicine (Week 24, 2005 – Week 30, 2006). Medication instructions were also studied for lercanidipine, nifedipine, and amlodipine, to compare adverse event information. Study and data selection: The English-language papers presenting clinical trials, abstracts, and literature reviews were included. Data synthesis: Lercanidipine is a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist (CA), used for AH treatment. Although the medication is not available in USA, it is widely used in other countries. In two randomised controlled studies, including 400 patients with mild to moderate AH, lercanidipine effectiveness was similar to that in two other dihydropyridine CA – felodipine and slow-release nifedipine, as demonstrated by a significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) levels after four weeks. In a longer study (12 months), lercanidipine (10 mg/d) normalised BP in 49% of the patients as soon as after 4 weeks of the therapy. A post-marketing study, including 9500 patients, confirmed the previous results: in 64%, DBP level reached 90 mm Hg or lower, and in 32%, BP was controlled (<140/90 mm Hg). In elderly patients, lercanidipine, similar to lacidipine and nifedipine, demonstrated a decrease in DBP comparable to that for nifedipine (-18,3 and -17,7 mm Hg, respectively). In contrast to the other dihydropyridine CA, lercanidipine is characterized by lower rates of adverse effects (lower leg edema, in particular). One study showed that fewer participants stopped their treatment due to adverse effects in the lercanidipine (0,9%) and nifedipine (3,8%) groups than in the felodipine group (4,5%). Lercanidipine also demonstrated antihypertensive activity similar to that in other antihypertensive medications, such as atenolol, captopril, and losartan. Conclusions: Lercanidipine could be used as a first-choice medication for AH treatment, since the available literature data confirm its comparative effectiveness and better tolerability, comparing to other antihypertensive agents. Further randomised double-blind clinical trials should be performed to clarify the place of lercanidipine among other medications for AH treatment.https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1375calcium antagonistdihydropyridinearterial hypertensionlercanidipine
spellingShingle C. Beckey
A. Lundy
N. Lutfi
LERCANIDIPINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
Российский кардиологический журнал
calcium antagonist
dihydropyridine
arterial hypertension
lercanidipine
title LERCANIDIPINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
title_full LERCANIDIPINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
title_fullStr LERCANIDIPINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
title_full_unstemmed LERCANIDIPINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
title_short LERCANIDIPINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
title_sort lercanidipine in the treatment of arterial hypertension
topic calcium antagonist
dihydropyridine
arterial hypertension
lercanidipine
url https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1375
work_keys_str_mv AT cbeckey lercanidipineinthetreatmentofarterialhypertension
AT alundy lercanidipineinthetreatmentofarterialhypertension
AT nlutfi lercanidipineinthetreatmentofarterialhypertension