Comparison of qPCR protocols for quantification of “Candidatus Saccharibacteria”, belonging to the Candidate Phyla Radiation, suggests that 23S rRNA is a better target than 16S rRNA

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stella Papaleo, Riccardo Nodari, Lodovico Sterzi, Enza D’Auria, Camilla Cattaneo, Giorgia Bettoni, Clara Bonaiti, Ella Pagliarini, Gianvincenzo Zuccotti, Simona Panelli, Francesco Comandatore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670941/?tool=EBI
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850103417921339392
author Stella Papaleo
Riccardo Nodari
Lodovico Sterzi
Enza D’Auria
Camilla Cattaneo
Giorgia Bettoni
Clara Bonaiti
Ella Pagliarini
Gianvincenzo Zuccotti
Simona Panelli
Francesco Comandatore
author_facet Stella Papaleo
Riccardo Nodari
Lodovico Sterzi
Enza D’Auria
Camilla Cattaneo
Giorgia Bettoni
Clara Bonaiti
Ella Pagliarini
Gianvincenzo Zuccotti
Simona Panelli
Francesco Comandatore
author_sort Stella Papaleo
collection DOAJ
format Article
id doaj-art-437f24edf0d14e24a6b2b1b3bd1002a9
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-437f24edf0d14e24a6b2b1b3bd1002a92025-08-20T02:39:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912Comparison of qPCR protocols for quantification of “Candidatus Saccharibacteria”, belonging to the Candidate Phyla Radiation, suggests that 23S rRNA is a better target than 16S rRNAStella PapaleoRiccardo NodariLodovico SterziEnza D’AuriaCamilla CattaneoGiorgia BettoniClara BonaitiElla PagliariniGianvincenzo ZuccottiSimona PanelliFrancesco Comandatorehttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670941/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Stella Papaleo
Riccardo Nodari
Lodovico Sterzi
Enza D’Auria
Camilla Cattaneo
Giorgia Bettoni
Clara Bonaiti
Ella Pagliarini
Gianvincenzo Zuccotti
Simona Panelli
Francesco Comandatore
Comparison of qPCR protocols for quantification of “Candidatus Saccharibacteria”, belonging to the Candidate Phyla Radiation, suggests that 23S rRNA is a better target than 16S rRNA
PLoS ONE
title Comparison of qPCR protocols for quantification of “Candidatus Saccharibacteria”, belonging to the Candidate Phyla Radiation, suggests that 23S rRNA is a better target than 16S rRNA
title_full Comparison of qPCR protocols for quantification of “Candidatus Saccharibacteria”, belonging to the Candidate Phyla Radiation, suggests that 23S rRNA is a better target than 16S rRNA
title_fullStr Comparison of qPCR protocols for quantification of “Candidatus Saccharibacteria”, belonging to the Candidate Phyla Radiation, suggests that 23S rRNA is a better target than 16S rRNA
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of qPCR protocols for quantification of “Candidatus Saccharibacteria”, belonging to the Candidate Phyla Radiation, suggests that 23S rRNA is a better target than 16S rRNA
title_short Comparison of qPCR protocols for quantification of “Candidatus Saccharibacteria”, belonging to the Candidate Phyla Radiation, suggests that 23S rRNA is a better target than 16S rRNA
title_sort comparison of qpcr protocols for quantification of candidatus saccharibacteria belonging to the candidate phyla radiation suggests that 23s rrna is a better target than 16s rrna
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670941/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT stellapapaleo comparisonofqpcrprotocolsforquantificationofcandidatussaccharibacteriabelongingtothecandidatephylaradiationsuggeststhat23srrnaisabettertargetthan16srrna
AT riccardonodari comparisonofqpcrprotocolsforquantificationofcandidatussaccharibacteriabelongingtothecandidatephylaradiationsuggeststhat23srrnaisabettertargetthan16srrna
AT lodovicosterzi comparisonofqpcrprotocolsforquantificationofcandidatussaccharibacteriabelongingtothecandidatephylaradiationsuggeststhat23srrnaisabettertargetthan16srrna
AT enzadauria comparisonofqpcrprotocolsforquantificationofcandidatussaccharibacteriabelongingtothecandidatephylaradiationsuggeststhat23srrnaisabettertargetthan16srrna
AT camillacattaneo comparisonofqpcrprotocolsforquantificationofcandidatussaccharibacteriabelongingtothecandidatephylaradiationsuggeststhat23srrnaisabettertargetthan16srrna
AT giorgiabettoni comparisonofqpcrprotocolsforquantificationofcandidatussaccharibacteriabelongingtothecandidatephylaradiationsuggeststhat23srrnaisabettertargetthan16srrna
AT clarabonaiti comparisonofqpcrprotocolsforquantificationofcandidatussaccharibacteriabelongingtothecandidatephylaradiationsuggeststhat23srrnaisabettertargetthan16srrna
AT ellapagliarini comparisonofqpcrprotocolsforquantificationofcandidatussaccharibacteriabelongingtothecandidatephylaradiationsuggeststhat23srrnaisabettertargetthan16srrna
AT gianvincenzozuccotti comparisonofqpcrprotocolsforquantificationofcandidatussaccharibacteriabelongingtothecandidatephylaradiationsuggeststhat23srrnaisabettertargetthan16srrna
AT simonapanelli comparisonofqpcrprotocolsforquantificationofcandidatussaccharibacteriabelongingtothecandidatephylaradiationsuggeststhat23srrnaisabettertargetthan16srrna
AT francescocomandatore comparisonofqpcrprotocolsforquantificationofcandidatussaccharibacteriabelongingtothecandidatephylaradiationsuggeststhat23srrnaisabettertargetthan16srrna