Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation
Collaborative flight formations represent a promising operational model, but the integration of multi-source information in manned interfaces often results in cognitive overload and reduced situation awareness. This study evaluates the effectiveness of intelligent auxiliary information presentation...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Aerospace |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/1/57 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832589464231215104 |
---|---|
author | Xiyue Wang Liping Pang Dan Miao Hongying Yan Xiaodong Cao Xiaoxiang Wu |
author_facet | Xiyue Wang Liping Pang Dan Miao Hongying Yan Xiaodong Cao Xiaoxiang Wu |
author_sort | Xiyue Wang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Collaborative flight formations represent a promising operational model, but the integration of multi-source information in manned interfaces often results in cognitive overload and reduced situation awareness. This study evaluates the effectiveness of intelligent auxiliary information presentation modes in enhancing personnel capabilities. Using a simulation-based collaborative flight formation system, four presentation modes with varying levels of information and dynamics were experimentally tested and evaluated across subjective dimensions (cognitive workload, situation awareness, and interface design) and objective dimensions (design task flow information load and operational task flow information load). The results indicate that Level 3 and Level 4 modes significantly reduced mental workload and improved practical operational ability compared to the original mode. Level 3 achieved the highest interface evaluation scores, while Level 4 demonstrated the lowest design task flow information load. Both modes significantly enhanced situation awareness. Altogether, Level 3 and Level 4 resulted in the most significant improvements in personnel capabilities. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing interface design and improving situation awareness in collaborative flight formation tasks. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-43264311016947e58427bc8df39ad462 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2226-4310 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Aerospace |
spelling | doaj-art-43264311016947e58427bc8df39ad4622025-01-24T13:15:40ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102025-01-011215710.3390/aerospace12010057Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight FormationXiyue Wang0Liping Pang1Dan Miao2Hongying Yan3Xiaodong Cao4Xiaoxiang Wu5School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaDepartment of Information Science, Beijing City University, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaCollaborative flight formations represent a promising operational model, but the integration of multi-source information in manned interfaces often results in cognitive overload and reduced situation awareness. This study evaluates the effectiveness of intelligent auxiliary information presentation modes in enhancing personnel capabilities. Using a simulation-based collaborative flight formation system, four presentation modes with varying levels of information and dynamics were experimentally tested and evaluated across subjective dimensions (cognitive workload, situation awareness, and interface design) and objective dimensions (design task flow information load and operational task flow information load). The results indicate that Level 3 and Level 4 modes significantly reduced mental workload and improved practical operational ability compared to the original mode. Level 3 achieved the highest interface evaluation scores, while Level 4 demonstrated the lowest design task flow information load. Both modes significantly enhanced situation awareness. Altogether, Level 3 and Level 4 resulted in the most significant improvements in personnel capabilities. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing interface design and improving situation awareness in collaborative flight formation tasks.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/1/57collaborative flight formation systemintelligent auxiliary information presentationsubjective evaluationinformation loadpersonnel capabilities |
spellingShingle | Xiyue Wang Liping Pang Dan Miao Hongying Yan Xiaodong Cao Xiaoxiang Wu Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation Aerospace collaborative flight formation system intelligent auxiliary information presentation subjective evaluation information load personnel capabilities |
title | Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation |
title_full | Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation |
title_short | Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation |
title_sort | evaluation of intelligent auxiliary information presentation mode for collaborative flight formation |
topic | collaborative flight formation system intelligent auxiliary information presentation subjective evaluation information load personnel capabilities |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/1/57 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiyuewang evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation AT lipingpang evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation AT danmiao evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation AT hongyingyan evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation AT xiaodongcao evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation AT xiaoxiangwu evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation |