Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation

Collaborative flight formations represent a promising operational model, but the integration of multi-source information in manned interfaces often results in cognitive overload and reduced situation awareness. This study evaluates the effectiveness of intelligent auxiliary information presentation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiyue Wang, Liping Pang, Dan Miao, Hongying Yan, Xiaodong Cao, Xiaoxiang Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Aerospace
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/1/57
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589464231215104
author Xiyue Wang
Liping Pang
Dan Miao
Hongying Yan
Xiaodong Cao
Xiaoxiang Wu
author_facet Xiyue Wang
Liping Pang
Dan Miao
Hongying Yan
Xiaodong Cao
Xiaoxiang Wu
author_sort Xiyue Wang
collection DOAJ
description Collaborative flight formations represent a promising operational model, but the integration of multi-source information in manned interfaces often results in cognitive overload and reduced situation awareness. This study evaluates the effectiveness of intelligent auxiliary information presentation modes in enhancing personnel capabilities. Using a simulation-based collaborative flight formation system, four presentation modes with varying levels of information and dynamics were experimentally tested and evaluated across subjective dimensions (cognitive workload, situation awareness, and interface design) and objective dimensions (design task flow information load and operational task flow information load). The results indicate that Level 3 and Level 4 modes significantly reduced mental workload and improved practical operational ability compared to the original mode. Level 3 achieved the highest interface evaluation scores, while Level 4 demonstrated the lowest design task flow information load. Both modes significantly enhanced situation awareness. Altogether, Level 3 and Level 4 resulted in the most significant improvements in personnel capabilities. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing interface design and improving situation awareness in collaborative flight formation tasks.
format Article
id doaj-art-43264311016947e58427bc8df39ad462
institution Kabale University
issn 2226-4310
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Aerospace
spelling doaj-art-43264311016947e58427bc8df39ad4622025-01-24T13:15:40ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102025-01-011215710.3390/aerospace12010057Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight FormationXiyue Wang0Liping Pang1Dan Miao2Hongying Yan3Xiaodong Cao4Xiaoxiang Wu5School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaDepartment of Information Science, Beijing City University, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaCollaborative flight formations represent a promising operational model, but the integration of multi-source information in manned interfaces often results in cognitive overload and reduced situation awareness. This study evaluates the effectiveness of intelligent auxiliary information presentation modes in enhancing personnel capabilities. Using a simulation-based collaborative flight formation system, four presentation modes with varying levels of information and dynamics were experimentally tested and evaluated across subjective dimensions (cognitive workload, situation awareness, and interface design) and objective dimensions (design task flow information load and operational task flow information load). The results indicate that Level 3 and Level 4 modes significantly reduced mental workload and improved practical operational ability compared to the original mode. Level 3 achieved the highest interface evaluation scores, while Level 4 demonstrated the lowest design task flow information load. Both modes significantly enhanced situation awareness. Altogether, Level 3 and Level 4 resulted in the most significant improvements in personnel capabilities. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing interface design and improving situation awareness in collaborative flight formation tasks.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/1/57collaborative flight formation systemintelligent auxiliary information presentationsubjective evaluationinformation loadpersonnel capabilities
spellingShingle Xiyue Wang
Liping Pang
Dan Miao
Hongying Yan
Xiaodong Cao
Xiaoxiang Wu
Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation
Aerospace
collaborative flight formation system
intelligent auxiliary information presentation
subjective evaluation
information load
personnel capabilities
title Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation
title_full Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation
title_fullStr Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation
title_short Evaluation of Intelligent Auxiliary Information Presentation Mode for Collaborative Flight Formation
title_sort evaluation of intelligent auxiliary information presentation mode for collaborative flight formation
topic collaborative flight formation system
intelligent auxiliary information presentation
subjective evaluation
information load
personnel capabilities
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/1/57
work_keys_str_mv AT xiyuewang evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation
AT lipingpang evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation
AT danmiao evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation
AT hongyingyan evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation
AT xiaodongcao evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation
AT xiaoxiangwu evaluationofintelligentauxiliaryinformationpresentationmodeforcollaborativeflightformation