Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity
Target size and test distance effects on stereoacuity were investigated in 24 subjects using a three-dimensional monitor. Examination 1: Target Size Effects. The test distance was 2.5 m for 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacui...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7950690 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832566198626156544 |
---|---|
author | Yo Iwata Fusako Fujimura Tomoya Handa Nobuyuki Shoji Hitoshi Ishikawa |
author_facet | Yo Iwata Fusako Fujimura Tomoya Handa Nobuyuki Shoji Hitoshi Ishikawa |
author_sort | Yo Iwata |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Target size and test distance effects on stereoacuity were investigated in 24 subjects using a three-dimensional monitor. Examination 1: Target Size Effects. The test distance was 2.5 m for 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values for 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes were 59.58±14.86, 47.66±13.71, 41.25±15.95, and 39.41±15.52 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity was significantly worse with a 0.1° target than with 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes (P=0.03, P<0.0001, and P<0.0001, resp.). Examination 2: Test Distance Effects. Test distances of 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 m were investigated for a 0.5° target size; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values at 2.5 m, 5.0 m, and 7.5 m test distances were 44.91±16.16, 34.83±10.84, and 24.75±7.27 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity at a 7.5 m distance was significantly better than at distances of 2.5 m and 5.0 m (P<0.0001 and P=0.02, resp.). Stereoacuity at a 5.0 m distance was significantly better than at 2.5 m (P=0.04). Stereoacuity should be estimated by both parallax and other elements, including test distance and target size. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-4316d7e2e77c49b4a9b1b9d64e9dc584 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-004X 2090-0058 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Ophthalmology |
spelling | doaj-art-4316d7e2e77c49b4a9b1b9d64e9dc5842025-02-03T01:04:49ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582016-01-01201610.1155/2016/79506907950690Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on StereoacuityYo Iwata0Fusako Fujimura1Tomoya Handa2Nobuyuki Shoji3Hitoshi Ishikawa4Doctor’s Program of Medical Science, Kitasato University Graduate School, Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, JapanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthoptics and Visual Science Course, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, JapanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthoptics and Visual Science Course, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, JapanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthoptics and Visual Science Course, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, JapanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthoptics and Visual Science Course, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, JapanTarget size and test distance effects on stereoacuity were investigated in 24 subjects using a three-dimensional monitor. Examination 1: Target Size Effects. The test distance was 2.5 m for 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values for 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes were 59.58±14.86, 47.66±13.71, 41.25±15.95, and 39.41±15.52 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity was significantly worse with a 0.1° target than with 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes (P=0.03, P<0.0001, and P<0.0001, resp.). Examination 2: Test Distance Effects. Test distances of 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 m were investigated for a 0.5° target size; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values at 2.5 m, 5.0 m, and 7.5 m test distances were 44.91±16.16, 34.83±10.84, and 24.75±7.27 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity at a 7.5 m distance was significantly better than at distances of 2.5 m and 5.0 m (P<0.0001 and P=0.02, resp.). Stereoacuity at a 5.0 m distance was significantly better than at 2.5 m (P=0.04). Stereoacuity should be estimated by both parallax and other elements, including test distance and target size.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7950690 |
spellingShingle | Yo Iwata Fusako Fujimura Tomoya Handa Nobuyuki Shoji Hitoshi Ishikawa Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity Journal of Ophthalmology |
title | Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity |
title_full | Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity |
title_fullStr | Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity |
title_short | Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity |
title_sort | effects of target size and test distance on stereoacuity |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7950690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoiwata effectsoftargetsizeandtestdistanceonstereoacuity AT fusakofujimura effectsoftargetsizeandtestdistanceonstereoacuity AT tomoyahanda effectsoftargetsizeandtestdistanceonstereoacuity AT nobuyukishoji effectsoftargetsizeandtestdistanceonstereoacuity AT hitoshiishikawa effectsoftargetsizeandtestdistanceonstereoacuity |