Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity

Target size and test distance effects on stereoacuity were investigated in 24 subjects using a three-dimensional monitor. Examination 1: Target Size Effects. The test distance was 2.5 m for 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacui...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yo Iwata, Fusako Fujimura, Tomoya Handa, Nobuyuki Shoji, Hitoshi Ishikawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7950690
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566198626156544
author Yo Iwata
Fusako Fujimura
Tomoya Handa
Nobuyuki Shoji
Hitoshi Ishikawa
author_facet Yo Iwata
Fusako Fujimura
Tomoya Handa
Nobuyuki Shoji
Hitoshi Ishikawa
author_sort Yo Iwata
collection DOAJ
description Target size and test distance effects on stereoacuity were investigated in 24 subjects using a three-dimensional monitor. Examination 1: Target Size Effects. The test distance was 2.5 m for 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values for 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes were 59.58±14.86, 47.66±13.71, 41.25±15.95, and 39.41±15.52 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity was significantly worse with a 0.1° target than with 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes (P=0.03, P<0.0001, and P<0.0001, resp.). Examination 2: Test Distance Effects. Test distances of 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 m were investigated for a 0.5° target size; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values at 2.5 m, 5.0 m, and 7.5 m test distances were 44.91±16.16, 34.83±10.84, and 24.75±7.27 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity at a 7.5 m distance was significantly better than at distances of 2.5 m and 5.0 m (P<0.0001 and P=0.02, resp.). Stereoacuity at a 5.0 m distance was significantly better than at 2.5 m (P=0.04). Stereoacuity should be estimated by both parallax and other elements, including test distance and target size.
format Article
id doaj-art-4316d7e2e77c49b4a9b1b9d64e9dc584
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-4316d7e2e77c49b4a9b1b9d64e9dc5842025-02-03T01:04:49ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582016-01-01201610.1155/2016/79506907950690Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on StereoacuityYo Iwata0Fusako Fujimura1Tomoya Handa2Nobuyuki Shoji3Hitoshi Ishikawa4Doctor’s Program of Medical Science, Kitasato University Graduate School, Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, JapanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthoptics and Visual Science Course, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, JapanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthoptics and Visual Science Course, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, JapanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthoptics and Visual Science Course, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, JapanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthoptics and Visual Science Course, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, JapanTarget size and test distance effects on stereoacuity were investigated in 24 subjects using a three-dimensional monitor. Examination 1: Target Size Effects. The test distance was 2.5 m for 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values for 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes were 59.58±14.86, 47.66±13.71, 41.25±15.95, and 39.41±15.52 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity was significantly worse with a 0.1° target than with 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.9° target sizes (P=0.03, P<0.0001, and P<0.0001, resp.). Examination 2: Test Distance Effects. Test distances of 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 m were investigated for a 0.5° target size; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values at 2.5 m, 5.0 m, and 7.5 m test distances were 44.91±16.16, 34.83±10.84, and 24.75±7.27 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity at a 7.5 m distance was significantly better than at distances of 2.5 m and 5.0 m (P<0.0001 and P=0.02, resp.). Stereoacuity at a 5.0 m distance was significantly better than at 2.5 m (P=0.04). Stereoacuity should be estimated by both parallax and other elements, including test distance and target size.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7950690
spellingShingle Yo Iwata
Fusako Fujimura
Tomoya Handa
Nobuyuki Shoji
Hitoshi Ishikawa
Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity
title_full Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity
title_fullStr Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity
title_short Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity
title_sort effects of target size and test distance on stereoacuity
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7950690
work_keys_str_mv AT yoiwata effectsoftargetsizeandtestdistanceonstereoacuity
AT fusakofujimura effectsoftargetsizeandtestdistanceonstereoacuity
AT tomoyahanda effectsoftargetsizeandtestdistanceonstereoacuity
AT nobuyukishoji effectsoftargetsizeandtestdistanceonstereoacuity
AT hitoshiishikawa effectsoftargetsizeandtestdistanceonstereoacuity