PSA is not suitable as a reliable marker for seminal fluid in rectal samples collected post-mortem

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests are used in forensic examinations of sexual offences to indicate the presence of seminal fluid. Based on a retrospective analysis of 484 forensic samples collected in sexual assault cases, we observed a significant enrichment of potentially misleading tests for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corine Müller, Elie Pascolo Tièche, Martin Zieger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-07-01
Series:Forensic Science International: Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910725000052
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583082437246976
author Corine Müller
Elie Pascolo Tièche
Martin Zieger
author_facet Corine Müller
Elie Pascolo Tièche
Martin Zieger
author_sort Corine Müller
collection DOAJ
description Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests are used in forensic examinations of sexual offences to indicate the presence of seminal fluid. Based on a retrospective analysis of 484 forensic samples collected in sexual assault cases, we observed a significant enrichment of potentially misleading tests for seminal fluid, for samples collected post-mortem. Reduced reliability of PSA testing for the indication of the presence of ejaculate in samples collected post-mortem has already been reported previously. However, previous studies either included only a small number of rectal samples, particularly from female cadavers, or were based on vaginal swabs. In our study, 34 female and 67 male rectal swab samples collected post-mortem were analysed. The rate of positive SERATEC® PSA Semiquant tests was 33 % for women and 67 % for men. Using male specific qPCR, male DNA was detected in only one of the female samples, indicating a high false-positive rate for both sexes when using SERATEC® PSA Semiquant tests as indicators for the presence of seminal liquid post mortem. Different degrees of decomposition showed no significant correlation with the PSA positivity rate. As expected, a significant correlation between the sex of the deceased individuals and the PSA test result could be demonstrated. The study demonstrates the very limited probative value of PSA as a marker for seminal fluid post mortem.
format Article
id doaj-art-4309d9ee73d24a1cb70b329bfe23020f
institution Kabale University
issn 2665-9107
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Forensic Science International: Reports
spelling doaj-art-4309d9ee73d24a1cb70b329bfe23020f2025-01-29T05:01:43ZengElsevierForensic Science International: Reports2665-91072025-07-0111100409PSA is not suitable as a reliable marker for seminal fluid in rectal samples collected post-mortemCorine Müller0Elie Pascolo Tièche1Martin Zieger2Institute of Forensic Medicine, Forensic Molecular Biology Department, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 26, Bern 3008, SwitzerlandInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Forensic Molecular Biology Department, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 26, Bern 3008, SwitzerlandCorresponding author.; Institute of Forensic Medicine, Forensic Molecular Biology Department, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 26, Bern 3008, SwitzerlandProstate-specific antigen (PSA) tests are used in forensic examinations of sexual offences to indicate the presence of seminal fluid. Based on a retrospective analysis of 484 forensic samples collected in sexual assault cases, we observed a significant enrichment of potentially misleading tests for seminal fluid, for samples collected post-mortem. Reduced reliability of PSA testing for the indication of the presence of ejaculate in samples collected post-mortem has already been reported previously. However, previous studies either included only a small number of rectal samples, particularly from female cadavers, or were based on vaginal swabs. In our study, 34 female and 67 male rectal swab samples collected post-mortem were analysed. The rate of positive SERATEC® PSA Semiquant tests was 33 % for women and 67 % for men. Using male specific qPCR, male DNA was detected in only one of the female samples, indicating a high false-positive rate for both sexes when using SERATEC® PSA Semiquant tests as indicators for the presence of seminal liquid post mortem. Different degrees of decomposition showed no significant correlation with the PSA positivity rate. As expected, a significant correlation between the sex of the deceased individuals and the PSA test result could be demonstrated. The study demonstrates the very limited probative value of PSA as a marker for seminal fluid post mortem.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910725000052PSAProstate-specific antigenSeminal fluidPost-mortemForensicSexual offence
spellingShingle Corine Müller
Elie Pascolo Tièche
Martin Zieger
PSA is not suitable as a reliable marker for seminal fluid in rectal samples collected post-mortem
Forensic Science International: Reports
PSA
Prostate-specific antigen
Seminal fluid
Post-mortem
Forensic
Sexual offence
title PSA is not suitable as a reliable marker for seminal fluid in rectal samples collected post-mortem
title_full PSA is not suitable as a reliable marker for seminal fluid in rectal samples collected post-mortem
title_fullStr PSA is not suitable as a reliable marker for seminal fluid in rectal samples collected post-mortem
title_full_unstemmed PSA is not suitable as a reliable marker for seminal fluid in rectal samples collected post-mortem
title_short PSA is not suitable as a reliable marker for seminal fluid in rectal samples collected post-mortem
title_sort psa is not suitable as a reliable marker for seminal fluid in rectal samples collected post mortem
topic PSA
Prostate-specific antigen
Seminal fluid
Post-mortem
Forensic
Sexual offence
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910725000052
work_keys_str_mv AT corinemuller psaisnotsuitableasareliablemarkerforseminalfluidinrectalsamplescollectedpostmortem
AT eliepascolotieche psaisnotsuitableasareliablemarkerforseminalfluidinrectalsamplescollectedpostmortem
AT martinzieger psaisnotsuitableasareliablemarkerforseminalfluidinrectalsamplescollectedpostmortem