Prospective evaluation of extended reality for neonatal intubation education

Abstract Purpose 360° immersive videos may be useful in procedure-based healthcare settings. We hypothesized that extended reality (XR) neonatal intubation education is a feasible alternative to live demonstration in skill and knowledge transfer. Methods This was a prospective single center evaluati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Donnchadh O’Sullivan, Tomas Leng, Christopher Bosley, Amelia Barwise, Raymond Stetson, Yue Dong, Stephanie Mavis, Venkatesh Bellamkonda, Christopher Colby, Brian Pickering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2024-10-01
Series:Discover Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00296-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850201794793177088
author Donnchadh O’Sullivan
Tomas Leng
Christopher Bosley
Amelia Barwise
Raymond Stetson
Yue Dong
Stephanie Mavis
Venkatesh Bellamkonda
Christopher Colby
Brian Pickering
author_facet Donnchadh O’Sullivan
Tomas Leng
Christopher Bosley
Amelia Barwise
Raymond Stetson
Yue Dong
Stephanie Mavis
Venkatesh Bellamkonda
Christopher Colby
Brian Pickering
author_sort Donnchadh O’Sullivan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose 360° immersive videos may be useful in procedure-based healthcare settings. We hypothesized that extended reality (XR) neonatal intubation education is a feasible alternative to live demonstration in skill and knowledge transfer. Methods This was a prospective single center evaluation of an educational XR intubation video using Premature Anne™ (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) comparing to a live demonstration. Participants were randomly allocated to either live demonstration or XR group. Each group received 20 min of teaching from the pediatric respiratory care education specialist, either in person or in video format. Intubation success, knowledge and skill acquisition were measured using a questionnaire and checklist. Results We had a total of 23 participants, XR (n = 11) and live demonstration (n = 12). The groups were heterogeneous in experience level.The XR group was successful at intubating 73% of the time (n = 8), which was not significantly different to the live demonstration group 58% (n = 7) (p = 0.667). For patients who achieved intubation, there was no difference between groups in the mean time to successful intubation; 98 s (SD 73) for the XR group and 65 s (SD 22) for the live demonstration group (p = 0.685).When comparing scores between groups there were no statistically significant differences regarding knowledge scores (p = 0.514), skill scores (p = 0.826) and total scores (p = 0.926). Conclusion These preliminary findings indicated no significant differences between the XR and live demonstration groups in terms of intubation success, knowledge acquisition, skill performance, total scores or time to successful intubation.
format Article
id doaj-art-42cdb72bc4b14df69d5932629a9b7cf5
institution OA Journals
issn 2731-5525
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Discover Education
spelling doaj-art-42cdb72bc4b14df69d5932629a9b7cf52025-08-20T02:11:55ZengSpringerDiscover Education2731-55252024-10-01311810.1007/s44217-024-00296-3Prospective evaluation of extended reality for neonatal intubation educationDonnchadh O’Sullivan0Tomas Leng1Christopher Bosley2Amelia Barwise3Raymond Stetson4Yue Dong5Stephanie Mavis6Venkatesh Bellamkonda7Christopher Colby8Brian Pickering9Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo ClinicDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo ClinicDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine - Respiratory Care, Mayo ClinicDivision of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo ClinicMultidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care (METRIC), Mayo ClinicDivision of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo ClinicDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo ClinicMultidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care (METRIC), Mayo ClinicAbstract Purpose 360° immersive videos may be useful in procedure-based healthcare settings. We hypothesized that extended reality (XR) neonatal intubation education is a feasible alternative to live demonstration in skill and knowledge transfer. Methods This was a prospective single center evaluation of an educational XR intubation video using Premature Anne™ (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) comparing to a live demonstration. Participants were randomly allocated to either live demonstration or XR group. Each group received 20 min of teaching from the pediatric respiratory care education specialist, either in person or in video format. Intubation success, knowledge and skill acquisition were measured using a questionnaire and checklist. Results We had a total of 23 participants, XR (n = 11) and live demonstration (n = 12). The groups were heterogeneous in experience level.The XR group was successful at intubating 73% of the time (n = 8), which was not significantly different to the live demonstration group 58% (n = 7) (p = 0.667). For patients who achieved intubation, there was no difference between groups in the mean time to successful intubation; 98 s (SD 73) for the XR group and 65 s (SD 22) for the live demonstration group (p = 0.685).When comparing scores between groups there were no statistically significant differences regarding knowledge scores (p = 0.514), skill scores (p = 0.826) and total scores (p = 0.926). Conclusion These preliminary findings indicated no significant differences between the XR and live demonstration groups in terms of intubation success, knowledge acquisition, skill performance, total scores or time to successful intubation.https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00296-3Extended realityNeonatal intubationFeasibility studyMedical education
spellingShingle Donnchadh O’Sullivan
Tomas Leng
Christopher Bosley
Amelia Barwise
Raymond Stetson
Yue Dong
Stephanie Mavis
Venkatesh Bellamkonda
Christopher Colby
Brian Pickering
Prospective evaluation of extended reality for neonatal intubation education
Discover Education
Extended reality
Neonatal intubation
Feasibility study
Medical education
title Prospective evaluation of extended reality for neonatal intubation education
title_full Prospective evaluation of extended reality for neonatal intubation education
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation of extended reality for neonatal intubation education
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation of extended reality for neonatal intubation education
title_short Prospective evaluation of extended reality for neonatal intubation education
title_sort prospective evaluation of extended reality for neonatal intubation education
topic Extended reality
Neonatal intubation
Feasibility study
Medical education
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00296-3
work_keys_str_mv AT donnchadhosullivan prospectiveevaluationofextendedrealityforneonatalintubationeducation
AT tomasleng prospectiveevaluationofextendedrealityforneonatalintubationeducation
AT christopherbosley prospectiveevaluationofextendedrealityforneonatalintubationeducation
AT ameliabarwise prospectiveevaluationofextendedrealityforneonatalintubationeducation
AT raymondstetson prospectiveevaluationofextendedrealityforneonatalintubationeducation
AT yuedong prospectiveevaluationofextendedrealityforneonatalintubationeducation
AT stephaniemavis prospectiveevaluationofextendedrealityforneonatalintubationeducation
AT venkateshbellamkonda prospectiveevaluationofextendedrealityforneonatalintubationeducation
AT christophercolby prospectiveevaluationofextendedrealityforneonatalintubationeducation
AT brianpickering prospectiveevaluationofextendedrealityforneonatalintubationeducation