Significance of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis

Background/Aim. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a relatively new diagnostic method offering better resolution of cardiac anatomy than the conventional transthoracal two-dimensional echocardiography (TTE). Clinical indications for TEE have been expanding, thus the technique as a diagnostic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Prcović Biljana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade 2010-01-01
Series:Vojnosanitetski Pregled
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2010/0042-84501001007P.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850186172217688064
author Prcović Biljana
author_facet Prcović Biljana
author_sort Prcović Biljana
collection DOAJ
description Background/Aim. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a relatively new diagnostic method offering better resolution of cardiac anatomy than the conventional transthoracal two-dimensional echocardiography (TTE). Clinical indications for TEE have been expanding, thus the technique as a diagnostic procedure is used in numerous cardiac diseases such as endocarditis, congenital heart defect, aortic dissection, prosthetic valves dysfunction, as well as in calculation of aortic valve surface in aortic stenosis. The aim of the study was to prove TEE as a more precise method in determination of the level of seriousness of aortic valve stenosis. Methods. All the patients went through TTE and TEE. Evaluating of the aortic valve surface was performed by the use of Gorlin's formula in TTE while it was planimetric in TEE examination. Results. Comparative analysis of all parameters obtained by TTE and TEE showed a difference between them. All the parameters values except that for surface area of the aortic valve orifice confluence were higher in TEE than in TTE examination, but no difference was statistically significant (p > 0.05; t-test for a dependant specimens). By the use of the TTE method, the size of aortic orifice stenosis was 1.22 ± 0.54 cm2, and by the TEE method it was 1.08 ± 0.54 cm2. Conclusion. Multiplain TEE is reliable in quantification of an aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis. It offers useful clinical information, particularly in patients with non-adequate evaluation with TTE, as well as in seriously ill patients or those with a confirmed valvular defect.
format Article
id doaj-art-424bc0210a8545a8af48eee54836c275
institution OA Journals
issn 0042-8450
language English
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade
record_format Article
series Vojnosanitetski Pregled
spelling doaj-art-424bc0210a8545a8af48eee54836c2752025-08-20T02:16:28ZengMinistry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, BelgradeVojnosanitetski Pregled0042-84502010-01-0167171210.2298/VSP1001007PSignificance of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of aortic valve stenosisPrcović BiljanaBackground/Aim. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a relatively new diagnostic method offering better resolution of cardiac anatomy than the conventional transthoracal two-dimensional echocardiography (TTE). Clinical indications for TEE have been expanding, thus the technique as a diagnostic procedure is used in numerous cardiac diseases such as endocarditis, congenital heart defect, aortic dissection, prosthetic valves dysfunction, as well as in calculation of aortic valve surface in aortic stenosis. The aim of the study was to prove TEE as a more precise method in determination of the level of seriousness of aortic valve stenosis. Methods. All the patients went through TTE and TEE. Evaluating of the aortic valve surface was performed by the use of Gorlin's formula in TTE while it was planimetric in TEE examination. Results. Comparative analysis of all parameters obtained by TTE and TEE showed a difference between them. All the parameters values except that for surface area of the aortic valve orifice confluence were higher in TEE than in TTE examination, but no difference was statistically significant (p > 0.05; t-test for a dependant specimens). By the use of the TTE method, the size of aortic orifice stenosis was 1.22 ± 0.54 cm2, and by the TEE method it was 1.08 ± 0.54 cm2. Conclusion. Multiplain TEE is reliable in quantification of an aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis. It offers useful clinical information, particularly in patients with non-adequate evaluation with TTE, as well as in seriously ill patients or those with a confirmed valvular defect.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2010/0042-84501001007P.pdfechocardiography, transesophagealechocardiographyaortic valve stenosisdiagnosis
spellingShingle Prcović Biljana
Significance of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis
Vojnosanitetski Pregled
echocardiography, transesophageal
echocardiography
aortic valve stenosis
diagnosis
title Significance of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis
title_full Significance of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis
title_fullStr Significance of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Significance of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis
title_short Significance of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis
title_sort significance of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis
topic echocardiography, transesophageal
echocardiography
aortic valve stenosis
diagnosis
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2010/0042-84501001007P.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT prcovicbiljana significanceoftransesophagealechocardiographyintheevaluationofaorticvalvestenosis