Comparative analysis of the ten Tusscher and Tomek human ventricular cell models at cellular, tissue, and organ levels: Implications for post‐infarct ventricular tachycardia simulation

Abstract Computational modeling is a tool for exploring both normal electrical propagation in healthy hearts and cardiac arrhythmias in patients. While numerous human ventricular cell models exist, the ten Tusscher (TT2) model is one of the most used for simulating ventricular arrhythmia. Recently,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruiqing Dong, Zhenyin Fu, Chuxin Zhang, Yumeng Liu, Yiming Wang, Nan Zhang, Zefeng Wang, Jun Hou, Ling Xia, Yongquan Wu, Shijie Zhou, Dongdong Deng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:Physiological Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70435
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Computational modeling is a tool for exploring both normal electrical propagation in healthy hearts and cardiac arrhythmias in patients. While numerous human ventricular cell models exist, the ten Tusscher (TT2) model is one of the most used for simulating ventricular arrhythmia. Recently, the Tomek model has been proposed, offering improved accuracy by better reproducing key depolarization, repolarization, and calcium dynamics in healthy ventricular cardiomyocytes. However, a quantitatively comprehensive comparison of these models at the single‐cell, tissue, and organ levels has not been conducted. This study systematically compared the TT2 and Tomek models by evaluating electrophysiological parameters and reentrant properties in 0‐dimensional(0D), 1‐dimensional(1D), 2‐dimensional (2D), and 3‐dimensional (3D) simulations. Additionally, the effects of ion currents modifications to simulate ischemic scar‐related tissue were analyzed. These results reveal that although the TT2 and Tomek models demonstrate distinct 0D, 1D, and 2D characteristics, their 3D reentrant properties—specifically in terms of reentry locations and critical conduction channels—are highly comparable. Therefore, both models are suitable for simulating post‐infarct ventricular tachycardia (VT), as their shared 3D features effectively capture the essential mechanisms underlying this arrhythmia.
ISSN:2051-817X