Comparative Analysis of A3C and PPO Algorithms in Reinforcement Learning: A Survey on General Environments
This research article presents a comparison between two mainstream Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithms, Asynchronous Advantage Actor-Critic (A3C) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), in the context of two diverse environments: CartPole and Lunar Lander. DRL algorithms are widely known fo...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | IEEE Access |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10703056/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This research article presents a comparison between two mainstream Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithms, Asynchronous Advantage Actor-Critic (A3C) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), in the context of two diverse environments: CartPole and Lunar Lander. DRL algorithms are widely known for their effectiveness in training agents to navigate complex environments and achieve optimal policies. Nevertheless, a methodical assessment of their effectiveness in various settings is crucial for comprehending their advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we conduct experiments on the CartPole and Lunar Lander environments using both A3C and PPO algorithms. We compare their performance in terms of convergence speed and stability. Our results indicate that A3C typically achieves quicker training times, but exhibits greater instability in reward values. Conversely, PPO demonstrates a more stable training process at the expense of longer execution times. An evaluation of the environment is needed in terms of algorithm selection, based on specific application needs, balancing between training time and stability. A3C is ideal for applications requiring rapid training, while PPO is better suited for those prioritizing training stability. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-3536 |