Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review

Objective. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular treatment for nondissected diseases of the ascending aorta. Data Sources. PubMed, Embase, and SciELO. Review Methods. In this study, we conducted a search on the PubMed, Embase, and SciELO databases for all cases of ascendi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weixue Huo, Mengwei He, Xianhao Bao, Ye Lu, Wen Tian, Jiaxuan Feng, Zhaoxiang Zeng, Rui Feng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Emergency Medicine International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5592622
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849304597873557504
author Weixue Huo
Mengwei He
Xianhao Bao
Ye Lu
Wen Tian
Jiaxuan Feng
Zhaoxiang Zeng
Rui Feng
author_facet Weixue Huo
Mengwei He
Xianhao Bao
Ye Lu
Wen Tian
Jiaxuan Feng
Zhaoxiang Zeng
Rui Feng
author_sort Weixue Huo
collection DOAJ
description Objective. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular treatment for nondissected diseases of the ascending aorta. Data Sources. PubMed, Embase, and SciELO. Review Methods. In this study, we conducted a search on the PubMed, Embase, and SciELO databases for all cases of ascending aortic endovascular repair included in the literature published between January 2007 and July 2023, excluding type A aortic dissection. We reviewed 56 case reports and 7 observational studies included in this study, assessing the techniques, equipment, procedural steps, and results. We summarized the age, complications, follow-up time, and access route. Results. This study includes 63 articles reporting 105 patients (mean age: 64.96 ± 17.08 years) who received endovascular repair for nondissected ascending aortic disease. The types of disease include aneurysm (N = 16), pseudoaneurysm (N = 71), penetrating aortic ulcer (N = 10), intramural hematoma (N = 2), thrombosis (N = 2), iatrogenic coarctation (N = 1), and rupture of the aorta (N = 3). The success rate of surgery is 99.05% (104/105). Complications include endoleak (10.48%, 11/105), stroke (5.71%, 6/105), postoperative infection (1.91%, 2/105), acute renal failure (0.95%, 1/105), aortic rupture (0.95%, 1/105), thrombosis (0.95%, 1/105), and splenic infarction (0.95%, 1/105). Five patients required conversion to open surgery, two patients underwent endovascular reintervention, and four of these five patients underwent surgery due to endoleak. Early mortality was 2.86% (3/105). Conclusion. While the viability and results of endovascular repair for the treatment of ascending aortic disease are acknowledged in some circumstances, further research is needed to determine the safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment for ascending aortic disease.
format Article
id doaj-art-41f8b618caa643b0bcf794b345caceed
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2859
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Emergency Medicine International
spelling doaj-art-41f8b618caa643b0bcf794b345caceed2025-08-20T03:55:41ZengWileyEmergency Medicine International2090-28592023-01-01202310.1155/2023/5592622Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic ReviewWeixue Huo0Mengwei He1Xianhao Bao2Ye Lu3Wen Tian4Jiaxuan Feng5Zhaoxiang Zeng6Rui Feng7Department of Vascular SurgeryDepartment of Vascular SurgeryDepartment of Vascular SurgeryDepartment of Vascular SurgeryDepartment of Vascular SurgeryDepartment of Vascular SurgeryDepartment of Vascular SurgeryDepartment of Vascular SurgeryObjective. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular treatment for nondissected diseases of the ascending aorta. Data Sources. PubMed, Embase, and SciELO. Review Methods. In this study, we conducted a search on the PubMed, Embase, and SciELO databases for all cases of ascending aortic endovascular repair included in the literature published between January 2007 and July 2023, excluding type A aortic dissection. We reviewed 56 case reports and 7 observational studies included in this study, assessing the techniques, equipment, procedural steps, and results. We summarized the age, complications, follow-up time, and access route. Results. This study includes 63 articles reporting 105 patients (mean age: 64.96 ± 17.08 years) who received endovascular repair for nondissected ascending aortic disease. The types of disease include aneurysm (N = 16), pseudoaneurysm (N = 71), penetrating aortic ulcer (N = 10), intramural hematoma (N = 2), thrombosis (N = 2), iatrogenic coarctation (N = 1), and rupture of the aorta (N = 3). The success rate of surgery is 99.05% (104/105). Complications include endoleak (10.48%, 11/105), stroke (5.71%, 6/105), postoperative infection (1.91%, 2/105), acute renal failure (0.95%, 1/105), aortic rupture (0.95%, 1/105), thrombosis (0.95%, 1/105), and splenic infarction (0.95%, 1/105). Five patients required conversion to open surgery, two patients underwent endovascular reintervention, and four of these five patients underwent surgery due to endoleak. Early mortality was 2.86% (3/105). Conclusion. While the viability and results of endovascular repair for the treatment of ascending aortic disease are acknowledged in some circumstances, further research is needed to determine the safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment for ascending aortic disease.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5592622
spellingShingle Weixue Huo
Mengwei He
Xianhao Bao
Ye Lu
Wen Tian
Jiaxuan Feng
Zhaoxiang Zeng
Rui Feng
Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review
Emergency Medicine International
title Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review
title_full Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review
title_short Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review
title_sort minimally invasive endovascular repair for nondissected ascending aortic disease a systematic review
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5592622
work_keys_str_mv AT weixuehuo minimallyinvasiveendovascularrepairfornondissectedascendingaorticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT mengweihe minimallyinvasiveendovascularrepairfornondissectedascendingaorticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT xianhaobao minimallyinvasiveendovascularrepairfornondissectedascendingaorticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT yelu minimallyinvasiveendovascularrepairfornondissectedascendingaorticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT wentian minimallyinvasiveendovascularrepairfornondissectedascendingaorticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT jiaxuanfeng minimallyinvasiveendovascularrepairfornondissectedascendingaorticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT zhaoxiangzeng minimallyinvasiveendovascularrepairfornondissectedascendingaorticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT ruifeng minimallyinvasiveendovascularrepairfornondissectedascendingaorticdiseaseasystematicreview